(微 NSFW)根据复测,DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 的道德限制和甲疑似大大提高,之前所有测过的擦边 RP 类 Prompt 基本上全军覆没,目前基本可以认为新 Pro 模型已经不适宜于 RP 用途。 *根据部分社区反馈,夺舍思维链可以缓解,但破甲强度绝对是大幅提升

Channel
娱乐迷因
@yulemiyin42
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002354831527 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yulemiyin42 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yulemiyin42 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 4 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 25.0%
- avg views ÷ 4 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1.0
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (12 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 47m 22s
- Average length
- 23m 41s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
经过多方实测,deepseek V4 pro 0813拉了 现在V4 pro别说碰瓷opus系列了 就连grok 4.6都不如 被阻击了 正式差距吧,欸。#大模型 #deepseek #测试评分0102 #科技资讯早知道 #智能新体验 #硬核科技迷 阅读更多 | 原文链接
北方人真的迷恋这个吗? 这次是真的被困在烟雨江南了 📍取景地:南京老门东 #南京小众打卡 #南京旅游 #江南烟雨美如画 #雨天漫步也是一种享受 #江南烟雨色 #烟雨落江南 #这个夏天一起吹风 原文链接
《江泽民》 第1集 《风雨历练》 来源:中央广播电视总台 @中新视频: 发布视频 播放量:7.72万 弹幕:0 评论:116 点赞:4936 投币:1461 收藏:4090 转发:4665 发布日期:2026-08-11 13:41:46
香蕉人与鸡蛋人 香蕉人通常指某些华人,黄皮(肤色/外形)+ 白心(文化认同、价值观、语言习惯等西化),体现出来的文化身份与生理性征的错位。 反之,白皮黄心则指外表是白人,但文化认同、价值取向、语言能力、家庭纽带等高度倾向中华文化或东亚语境。 这类人群在学术和媒体讨论中,有时被称为 “鸡蛋人”(Egg Man / Egg Person)——“蛋”是白壳(white shell)+ 黄心(yolk),形象对应“外白内黄”。 而在海外接受西方教育但仍保有中华文化认同的华人移民子女群体,外黄内黄,则被称为芒果人。
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
“检查一下大米是不是进过日本博物馆,我这边暂时建议把大米开除中国籍。 你像华北地区的人,小时候就不咋吃大米,这大米能是什么中国货? 大概率是境外势力渗透。” “我山东人,我小时候真没人吃大米,但是听说日本人爱吃大米,还爱用大米做各种食品” “对上了,这下对上了” “我也是山东的,我也没见过大米,我支持你” “越光米一看就是外务省发力了,活做的太糙了” “大米在日本被称为银舍利,是送礼佳品。这一下子就说的通了” “中国人谁送礼物会送大米呢? 一个在日本很上档次,值得送礼的东西,突然爆发舆情,感觉不奇怪吗? 所以我觉得这是一次精准的对华认知战战术预演,事件并非普通的礼品翻车,也不是普通企业公关危机,更不属于自然爆发的普通网络舆情。它是境外认知作战势力,依托成熟战术模板、固定传播团伙、内外回流链路,针对中国本土舆论场、民族情绪、政企形象、网络治理体系完成的一次低成本、高精度、全流程认知战战术预演。“
别人:国清副总,济宁副总,尹力书记处 我:敏儿能否最后一波 就很……
主要是朱从小父母双亡,是个孤儿,这种原生家庭的影响是一辈子的
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @yulemiyin42. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“娱乐迷因” (@yulemiyin42), 4 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yulemiyin42.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.