Channel
@Gossipplus
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
39,204subscribers
-3,409 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002207835332 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Gossipplus |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 51 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Gossipplus |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 39,204 | -45 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:18 | 39,249 | -79 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:18 | 39,328 | -47 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:08 | 39,375 | -51 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:17 | 39,426 | -45 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 39,471 | -32 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 16:21 | 39,503 | -38 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 39,541 | -58 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 08:50 | 39,599 | -38 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 09:28 | 39,637 | -38 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 06:47 | 39,675 | -55 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 04:27 | 39,730 | -50 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 07:58 | 39,780 | -17 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:11 | 39,797 | -82 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 19:40 | 39,879 | -253 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 40,132 | -164 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 21:20 | 40,296 | -455 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 40,751 | -311 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 41,062 | +32 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 41,030 | first reading |
880 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 162 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 880 (4 August 2026 – 27 October 2026) |
| Views total | 2,899,210 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Oct 2026, 19:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 232 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
ارسالی فرنگیس : فقط من دیشب سر این تیکه شوکه شدم؟ مبینا میگه باهات کات میکنم فرزام توی لفافه تهدید به قتل میکنه! ببخشید چقدر یهنفر میتونه کثیف و بیخانواده باشه بگه با داداش و مامانت خدافظی کن چون میکشمت؟ مبینا تو چقدر حقیری مثل اسب میخندی. باید همونجا که مادر مبینا آورد، این دختر میزد دهنش یعنی چی این شوخی و لفظا؟😐 @Gossipplus
ارسالی پارلا : واقعا ادما یه جایی از گفتن یه حرف تکراری خسته میشه وای ساناز نه حاجیی 90قسمته داره میگه دندان پزشکم خسته شوووو حاجی ببین ما خسته شدیم نشستیم😭😭😭💔 @Gossipplus
ارسالی صورتی : حرفای ستاره درباره نازنین۲. @Gossipplus
ارسالی والتر : واقعا پویا کی راز نازی رو به بقیه گفت؟ نازی حتی جواب این سوال پویا رو نداد و فقط جیغ جیغ کرد و گفت همه بچه ها میدونن! این حرف رو کفتارا دهن نازی انداختن و اونم از این شرایط سو استفاده کرد که پشت اکثریت باشه و خودشو سیو کنه چون پویا تک اوفتاده بود سودی براش نداشت. @Gossipplus
خلاصه قسمت هشتاد و ششم فصل سوم عشق ابدی. @Gossipplus
تیزر قسمت هشتاد و هفتم فصل سوم عشق ابدی. @Gossipplus
ارسالی مهیا : اینجا بهادر داره حرف از رفتار درست جلو خانوم ها میزنه میگه من تابه حال نشده تو دعوا با خانوم ها برم بالای سرشون تو صورتشون وایسم. بله بهادر جان شما تو صورت خانوم ها نمیری به جاش جلو خانوم ها شلوارتو میکشی پایین:))) @Gossipplus
⬇️ دانلود قسمت 86 فصل سوم عشق ابدی با کلیک روی ویدیو فرود میاید و نیازی هم نیست جایی جوین بشید ❤️ @GossipPlus
ارسالی والتر : رعنا میگه پویا و نگین پارانوئید (شکاک) هستن. درحالیکه خودش دوسپسر خودشو به همه چسبونده و حداقل یکبار با همه دخترا بخاطر سورنا(😂) دعوا کرده و واقعا مشکل کنترل خشم داره و اصلا حرفاش منطقی نیست و همیشه بی ربط حرف میزنه کسیم حرفاشو نمیفهمه. @Gossipplus
@Gossipplus
ارسالی فاطمه : نازی چقدر فرد چندش و کریهی شده بود! ما که متوجه شدیم حرف ستاره درمورد دوستپسرش درست بود، مهدی رو هم که از قبل میشناخت(اکس دوستشه)، الانم که داره اینجوری میکنه. پویا رو سفید نمیبینم ولی تو چجوری صفاتی که لایق فرزام اند رو به پویا میگی؟؟؟؟ بعدش هم رفت بیرون پیش رعنا شروع به گریه کرد که مثل وقتی که تو دعواش با ستاره(درمورد دوستپسر داشتنش که درست هم بود) گریه کرده بود مظلوم نمایی کنه @Gossipplus
ارسالی والتر : بچه ها یه دلیل اینکه میگم اونقدری که تینا هیت میگیره و حقش نیست باید فرزام بگیره اینه! نگین و تینا داشتن باهم میخندیدن و شوخی میکردن و فرزام زوال عقل سریع اومد در گوش تینا یه چیزی گفت که حدس میزنیم گفته "باهاش دوستی نکن" و تینا بعدش لبخندشو جمع کرد. مننمیخوام تینارو سفید کنم ولی میگم فقط چون یکم بازیخورش ملس بود دلیل نمیشه فرزام رو بزاریم در بره! @Gossipplus
Showing the 12 most recent of 880 posts we hold for @Gossipplus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@Gossipplus edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
رای نهاییتون کیه؟
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
شما به کی رای میدین؟🤒
The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 880 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 27 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“غیبت کنیم | Gossip Plus” (@Gossipplus), 39,204 subscribers as measured 27 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Gossipplus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.