Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Женат на Марине

@zhenatnamarine1234

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

227,636subscribers

-557 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001413557413
TypeChannel
Username@zhenatnamarine1234
DescriptionСотрудничество и PR: t.me/temurious Реклама: zhenatnamarine.pr@yandex.ru Сообщество зарегистрировано в Роскомнадзоре. Номер заявления № 5353037916 https://vk.com/zhenatnamarine1
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/zhenatnamarine1234

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

227,636228,193227,914.57 August 2026 — 228,193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 228,193 subscribers7 August 2026 — 228,173 subscribers8 August 2026 — 228,060 subscribers9 August 2026 — 227,956 subscribers10 August 2026 — 227,839 subscribers11 August 2026 — 227,711 subscribers12 August 2026 — 227,636 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -557. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 227,552–228,277 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 11:06227,636-75
11 Aug 2026, 12:52227,711-128
10 Aug 2026, 10:50227,839-117
9 Aug 2026, 11:11227,956-104
8 Aug 2026, 09:43228,060-113
7 Aug 2026, 10:40228,173-20
7 Aug 2026, 09:00228,193no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:49228,193first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.09%
avg views ÷ 227,636 subscribers
Avg views / post
20,700
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.90%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held19 (8 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total331,000
Reactions total6,278
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,940
Videos
2,400
Links
353

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
9m 56s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,310 reactions across 19 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,65450.0%
🙏89812.3%
🤣87912.0%
😢6619.04%
❤‍🔥3544.84%
🔥3234.42%
😁2172.97%
👍730.999%
💔460.629%
💘350.479%
🗿290.397%
😍280.383%
😭270.369%
🥴190.26%
🥰180.246%
😨170.233%
💋90.123%
🦄90.123%
💊40.055%
🥱30.041%
6 further kinds70.096%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,310reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @zhenatnamarine1234. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 09:46 UTC≈14,400 views765 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Всем привет, сегодня мама ездила в больницу к дедушке, состояние такое же, ничего не меняется, Ждём дальше

🙏60276😢60💔21💘2❤‍🔥1👍1💋1

7 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC≈18,500 views1,089 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Я никогда не показывался вам таким, мне больно внутри, мне непонятно что будет дальше, я боюсь, когда звонит телефон, боюсь, что там врач с плохой новостью. 2 дня назад нам позвонили соседи бабушки с дедушкой и сказали, что моего деда увезли в реанимацию с инсультом. Тогда я ещё не понимал серьезно это или не сильно. Сегодня мы были у него, меня не впустили, а маму впустили, он не реагирует на голос, не открывает гла

😢590🙏296144😭27💔22❤‍🔥5🤣3👍1

6 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC≈17,100 views345 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Катались вчера на колесе обозрения. В детстве я вообще не боялся этого, а теперь даже не могу шевелиться, да и Варюха такая же 😅

258🤣58😁22❤‍🔥5👍1🗿1

6 Aug 2026, 05:58 UTC≈18,500 views378 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

С первого раза

❤‍🔥26569😁28🔥10👍5🗿1

31 Jul 2026, 09:13 UTC≈25,200 views472 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Прошло 5 дней с нашего приезда на Алтай, мы были без детей, только в двоём с Мариной. Каждый день мы по несколько раз заходили в камеры и наблюдали за ними, общались по камерам и телефону, мы ни на минуту не переставали о них думать. Вот как это так работает, хотите с женой уехать ВДВОЁМ отдохнуть, но даже это не получается, потому как сразу хочется вернуться с своим сладеньким булочкам и заобнимать их.

382🔥37😍28😢11❤‍🔥5💔3🥴3🎃1

30 Jul 2026, 09:08 UTC≈21,200 views302 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Как говорил олень?🤣

211🤣72🦄9👍2💋2💘2❤‍🔥1🫡1

29 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC≈21,900 views288 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Он был в шоке от коров 🤣

206😁35🤣34❤‍🔥6💊4👍2💋1

28 Jul 2026, 11:16 UTC≈21,100 views486 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Доигрался ахахха

266🤣191😁10🔥5🥴5❤‍🔥3💘2😎2

26 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC≈22,300 views322 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

К шаману едем🤣

240🤣57❤‍🔥9💘7👍4🔥2😁2💋1

26 Jul 2026, 05:17 UTC≈18,700 views308 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Куку

🤣23357💘14❤‍🔥2👍1💋1

26 Jul 2026, 03:18 UTC≈19,300 views304 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ХОРОШО ТАМ, ГДЕ НАС НЕТ - очень частое выражение среди людей, но я не соглашусь с этим, красоту нашего окружения создаём мы сами, не обязательно мечтать о загранице, о дорогих отелях и тд. Достаточно поднять голову и оглянуться вокруг. Сегодня мы на Алтае, замечательное, цветущее, красивое место, а самое главное очень чистое, здесь не принято мусорить, даже обычную шкурку от банана только в мусорку. Мы посетили таких

262👍18🔥14❤‍🔥5🥰4💋1

21 Jul 2026, 14:15 UTC≈21,100 views410 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Уровень расшифровки стал сложнее

245🤣113😁33🔥9💘4❤‍🔥3🎄1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @zhenatnamarine1234. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Jul 2026, 13:36 UTCAnonymous Poll1,420 voters approx.

Играете в майнкрафт? Или играли?

  1. Играю16%
  2. Играл давно, щас не играю, но если что, могу сыграть43%
  3. Не играю47%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 914,328 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Женат на Марине” (@zhenatnamarine1234), 227,636 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zhenatnamarine1234.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.