Channel
@Adushkinaa
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
88,953subscribers
-348 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001241019813 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Adushkinaa |
| Description | Дневничок той самой комфортной подружки🍵🤍 Тут про гармонию с собой, wellness, дисциплину и музыку! Сотрудничество: [email protected] А+ Включен в перечень персональных страниц: https://rknn.link/dZ |
| Created | 4 November 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Adushkinaa |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 88,953 | -37 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:25 | 88,990 | -29 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 89,019 | -51 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 89,070 | -30 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 89,100 | -53 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 89,153 | -30 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:13 | 89,183 | -68 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 89,251 | -50 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:46 | 89,301 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (27 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 291,600 |
| Reactions total | 11,487 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11,487 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 79.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 9,150 | 79.7% | |
| 👍 | 753 | 6.56% | |
| 🐳 | 666 | 5.80% | |
| 🤯 | 524 | 4.56% | |
| 🤔 | 262 | 2.28% | |
| 👎 | 132 | 1.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,487reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Adushkinaa. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ребята, совсем скоро выезжаю в свой любимый Петербург на фестиваль Пикник Афиши🦄🤍 Примерно с 16 до 18 буду в бренд-зоне Магнита, ищите меня у большого разноцветного жирафа! Так что если тоже будете на фестивале, буду рада с вами пересечься, пофоткаться , послушать любимых артистов и просто весело провести время До завтра!
❤348🤔19👎12🤯6
Video message, posted without a caption
❤281🤔29🤯12👎6
ЛОКТИ is OUT🚜⚡️ http://dnkmusic.ru/adushkina_lokti слушайте по ссылке выше, снимайте свои сторис/ рилсы, отмечайте меня, сегодня буду весь день репостить вас!
❤295👍45🐳34👎7
но давайте к хорошим новостям🤫 уже сегодня ровно в 0:00 выходит мой новый релиз «ЛОКТИ» можете сохранить трек уже сейчас по этой ссылке, чтобы успеть послушать первыми🤍
❤377👍66👎26🤯14
Кстати помните я упоминала, что не смогла улететь на Бали пару дней назад? Так вот это тоже из-за этой всей истории и моего тик тока в 2020м году… 👆🏻 При том что я еще в декабре 2025 года выплатила все штрафы, мне все равно прилетел невыезд из страны. А узнала я об этом только на паспортном контроле буквально пару дней назад… когда меня развернули😭💔🤣 и смешно и грустно
❤490🤯191🤔49👍13
⚡️У Дани Милохина арестовали 400 тысяч рублей из-за старого видео в TикТоке 🤯 Речь идёт о ролике под трек «Владимир Путин - молодец», под который в 2020 году снимали видео многие артисты и блогеры. Тогда автор композиции подал в суд на Даню Милохина, Валю Карнавал, Егора Крида, Катю Адушкину и других. Теперь в рамках этого дела у Дани в российском банке заблокировали 400 тысяч рублей. К слову, ещё в январе Егор Ши…
❤165🤯84👍19👎7
Очень вдохновляют аутентичные, глубокие, уязвимые при этом очень сильные, трудоспособные и по хорошему crazy женщины))!
❤639👍56🐳44🤯12
Или еще вот как Катя IOWA
❤395🤔48🐳38👍13
Или как Ира Горбачева
❤403🤔53🐳38👍9
Я, когда вырасту, хочу стать, как Ида Галич
❤431🤔50🐳36👍11
были на концерте с моим другом Андреем… и что то жестко заностальгировали ведь ВОТ ТАК выглядел предыдущий концерт Вани, на котором мы были вместе: 2022 год Убран 1 000 человек в зале
❤790🐳96👍58👎8
Вот он! самый молодой артист в истории, который собрал ЛУЖНИКИ! 70 000 человек на одной площадке! полный sold out, бесконечные мурашки и тысячи голосов в унисон! Это всё Ваня Дмитриенко! Сегодня я должна была быть на Бали, но по воли судьбы так и не улетела, и все же успела побывать на этом историческом концерте! Чему я очень и очень рада! У меня мало дорогих моему сердцу людей в индустрии. Мало тех, с кем мы вмес…
❤975👍137🐳104👎17
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @Adushkinaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 721,576 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Katya Adushkina |
|---|---|
| Description | Russian videobloger |
| X / Twitter | @adushkinakatya |
| YouTube | UCA0Xum6Bxx-rhmrog1A1ISQ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“✨ADUSHCLUB✨ Катя Адушкина” (@Adushkinaa), 88,953 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Adushkinaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.