Обзоры на косметику, стильные образы и лайфстайл ✨
Добро пожаловать! 💞
Где ещё меня можно найти: http://mzoom.tilda.ws
Я в MAX - https://max.ru/m_zoom
По вопросам сотрудничества: [email protected]
https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a1d58823097106f31f9680
Created
Between 1 May 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 96 days, net -4,192. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 132,442–138,232 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 06:49
133,372
-28
9 Nov 2026, 15:18
133,400
+60
8 Nov 2026, 06:51
133,340
+35
6 Nov 2026, 23:50
133,305
+91
5 Nov 2026, 21:45
133,214
+74
4 Nov 2026, 21:20
133,140
+12
3 Nov 2026, 23:05
133,128
+18
2 Nov 2026, 20:22
133,110
-34
1 Nov 2026, 18:57
133,144
-5
31 Oct 2026, 20:48
133,149
-2
30 Oct 2026, 22:34
133,151
-14
30 Oct 2026, 02:07
133,165
-22
29 Oct 2026, 05:37
133,187
+2
28 Oct 2026, 03:10
133,185
+34
27 Oct 2026, 04:00
133,151
-57
26 Oct 2026, 02:16
133,208
-53
24 Oct 2026, 23:37
133,261
-71
23 Oct 2026, 21:16
133,332
-66
22 Oct 2026, 19:46
133,398
-62
21 Oct 2026, 18:06
133,460
first reading
Engagement
323 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 200 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.04%
avg views ÷ 133,372 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,100
104 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
104
of 323 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
323 (6 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
1,253,790
Reactions total
50,576
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 03:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,300
Videos
≈2,010
Links
≈1,840
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4h 12m
Average length
1m 28s
Measured directly from 172 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
148,652 reactions across 321 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
95,854
64.5%
❤🔥
13,928
9.37%
😍
6,586
4.43%
💘
6,461
4.35%
🍓
6,157
4.14%
🔥
5,256
3.54%
🥰
3,556
2.39%
👍
2,981
2.01%
🤩
1,771
1.19%
👌
1,507
1.01%
😱
1,066
0.717%
🍾
1,033
0.695%
🗿
906
0.609%
🕊
599
0.403%
🦄
468
0.315%
😨
336
0.226%
🌚
135
0.091%
🆒
52
0.035%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 322 of the 323 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 148,652 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 323 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
58
across the posts below
Posts paid on
34
of 323 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @itsmashazoom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 323 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 104 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
и так прошел наш вечер в компании Prolab Beauty 🩷
- хочется сказать, «ребята из PROLAB beauty” вы реально сумасшедшие 🥺
поражаюсь, как бренды организуют мероприятия, все продуманно до мелочей, куча активностей, вкусный фуршет, и как вишенка - невероятная презентация нового продукта ✨
у вас реально получилось сделать wow - презентацию новой LED-маски
(пс.нам до последнего не раскрывали карты - что же за новый бьют…
скажите что не одна я в шоке с этих гигантских корпусных десертов?🍓
та-дам big малина и киндер буэно на ваших экранах!
цена конечно космос, мне кажется это супер вариант тортика, но никак не «пирожного», даже вдвоем 1 такую позицию не осилить … ✨
видела вопросики где найти?
я брала в Cream Cookie, Екатеринбург, Пассаж, 4 этаж 😸
а еще день рождения недавно был у «самокат», и в честь этого они мне прислали пиньяту с наполнением 🪅
пс.салфетки для сервировки уже использовала вчера на «праздничный» завтрак … и они реально дофаминовые, очень круто освежат стол 🎀
устроила вчера Денису в честь его дня рождения небольшой сюрприз, и вместо обычно ужина в честь даты, пригласила на «киноужин»
он до последнего не знал куда мы идем, и что будем делать
у меня же такой «experience» был давно в сохраненках на лучший день
опыт действительно прикольный, ты смотришь фильм на большом экране, и блюда с экрана появляются на вашей тарелке в момент, когда их пробуют герои
мы были на фильме…
Showing the 12 most recent of 323 posts we hold for @itsmashazoom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
«СКОЛЬКО РАЗ В ЖИЗНИ ВЫ ПЕРЕЗЖАЛИ, и меняли место жительства?»
НИКОГДА не переезжал17%
1-2 раза36%
3-4 раза25%
5-6 раз12%
7-8 раз5%
9-10 раз3%
более 10 раз4%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 323 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ПОЛЯ ТУТ @polya_tut_official · 153,025 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 21 August 2026
Elmofeo Life @elmofeo_life · 25,331 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 14 September 2026
МАША БЕЗ МЕДВЕДЯ @masha51 · 28,931 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 7 September 2026
Лизка с корицей✨ @lizka_cinnamon · 29,931 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 29 here — alongside 28 others — read 7 September 2026
Niky Macaleen @nikysarang · 32,585 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 4 September 2026
Ксения Куприкова @officialkuprikova · 67,620 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 August 2026
ул.Графская️👑 @graphdg · 110,097 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026
Polina Say @polinassay · 66,944 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 20 August 2026
Fancy smth @fancysmth · 47,785 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 August 2026
Victoria Portfolio @victoriaportfolio · 24,931 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 14 September 2026
БЕЛЬЧИКИ @kbelchik · 64,278 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
Юля Годунова @juliagodunova · 95,915 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 20 August 2026
kriv.da, что нового❓ @dari_krivda · 29,253 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
Игорь Мёдов @igor_medov · 65,970 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 21 August 2026
FOR ME @forme · 149,390 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 14 August 2026
Молотошки @molotosha · 81,257 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 2 September 2026
RedAutumn @olyaredautumn · 107,321 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
АНТОН ЛАЗАРЕВ💎⚒ @LazarevLAV · 62,450 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 10 September 2026
🍓AlexGoldenGirl ✨ мотивация @alexgoldengirl · 24,448 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 17 September 2026
blestuchka @blestuchka · 81,372 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 18 August 2026
Marchenko_liza @lizonnnnn · 38,195 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 30 August 2026
✨КСЮШИНЫ ИСТОРИИ✨ @tinycrazy · 40,357 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 29 August 2026
Hi, Darling @hidarling_ru · 26,817 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 9 September 2026
Pankova Home 🏠 @PankovaHome · 61,430 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 22 August 2026
This channel appears in 47 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Привет, Это Я МАША✌️😃 / Masha Zoom / Маша Зум” (@itsmashazoom), 133,372 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itsmashazoom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.