Channel
@Maysa9718
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
115,798subscribers
-7,652 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001893824180 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Maysa9718 |
| Description | وَاللَّهُ غَالِبٌ عَلَى أَمْرِهِ وَلَكِنَّ أَكْثَرَ النَّاسِ لَا يَعْلَمُونَ} يُرِيدُونَ أَن يُطْفِئُوا نُورَ اللَّهِ بِأَفْوَاهِهِمْ وَيَأْبَى اللَّهُ إِلَّا أَن يُتِمَّ نُورَهُ وَلَوْ كَرِهَ الْكَافِرُونَ" |
| Created | 28 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 28 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 39 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Maysa9718 |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
107 average views per post against 115,798 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.092%. Across the 582 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,034–311,185 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic — the middle half sit between 1.23% and 10.4%, with a median of 3.71%.
| Window | 30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 492 of 492 published in the window (492 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 52,668 |
| Mature posts only | 0.153% over 97 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 115,798 measured 5 November 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000:ara · 582 channels · p10 0.445% · p25 1.23% · p50 3.71% · p75 10.4% · p90 22.4% |
| Position in cohort | 0.688th percentile · 1/40 the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.249% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Arabic · 99.8% of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 11:29 | 115,798 | -119 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:39 | 115,917 | -141 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:54 | 116,058 | -95 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 10:05 | 116,153 | -144 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 09:09 | 116,297 | -141 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:00 | 116,438 | -135 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:35 | 116,573 | -125 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:06 | 116,698 | -123 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 04:00 | 116,821 | -126 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:10 | 116,947 | -99 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:30 | 117,046 | -83 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 04:08 | 117,129 | -110 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:07 | 117,239 | -131 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 03:19 | 117,370 | -103 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:10 | 117,473 | -151 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:46 | 117,624 | -118 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 23:07 | 117,742 | -130 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 20:30 | 117,872 | -142 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:48 | 118,014 | -126 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:18 | 118,140 | first reading |
1,162 posts held, back to 28 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 143 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,162 (28 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 51,838 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 5 Nov 2026, 16:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 579 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 491 posts held from the last 30 days (2.24%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
تيد كروز: عام 2026 لم يكن مجرد موجة زرقاء. بل كان تسونامي أزرق. لقد كانت هزيمة ساحقة. لم تكن مجرد انتخابات وسيطة سيئة في عام 2006. بل كانت رفضًا على مستوى فضيحة ووترغيت. في بعض الأحيان، يجب الاحتفاء بالتاريخ. وفي أحيان أخرى، يجب الحداد عليه. 🌟
تيد كروز: منذ أسابيع، كنت أحذر علنًا في هذا البودكاست من أننا كنا في خطر حقيقي من خسارة كل شيء في ولاية تكساس. عدد قليل جدًا من الناس اعتقدوا أن ذلك ممكن. أنا آسف جدًا لأن هذا قد تحقق. لم يكن لدى ولاية تكساس حاكم ديمقراطي منذ عام 1994. ولم يكن لدينا سيناتور ديمقراطي منذ عام 1993. الآن، سيكون لدينا كلاهما. 🌟
جون بولتون: أعتقد أن سيطرة الرئيس ترامب على الحزب قد تراجعت. ولا أعتقد أنه يستطيع إعادة تجميع الحزب مرة أخرى. بالتأكيد، لست أقول إنه أصبح غير مهم تمامًا، ولكنني أعتقد أن الديناميكية في العامين الماضيين ستكون مختلفة جدًا، جدًا. 🌟
جون بولتون: سيكون الطابع والأسلوب السياسي في واشنطن مختلفين. ولكن ترامب سيفعل ما سيفعله على أي حال. لا أعتقد أن هذا التحول في السلطة سيكون له تأثير كبير عليه. 🌟
زيلينسكي عن إيلون ماسك: أعتقد أن تأثير إيلون ماسك، وما يقوله في رسائله، وماذا يفكر بشأن كيف يجب أن تعيش أوروبا، ومن يجب أن يلعب الدور القيادي في ألمانيا، ومن يجب أن يكون في السلطة في أوكرانيا - هذه ليست مجرد كلمات. عندما تأتي هذه التصريحات من شخص ثري للغاية، فإنها تحمل تأثيرًا. وليس له الحق في التأثير على هذه الأمور. إنه مواطن في بلد آخر. 🌟
زيلينسكي: إيلون ماسك هو أغنى رجل في العالم، كما يقولون. ومن هو أغنى شخص بعده؟ بوتين. ربما يكون بوتين هو الأغنى. لا أعرف. هذا مخيف. 🌟
تيد كروز: أسعار المواد الغذائية مرتفعة للغاية. أسعار الوقود مرتفعة للغاية. أسعار الديزل مرتفعة للغاية. أسعار التأمين مرتفعة للغاية. تكلفة الحياة مرتفعة للغاية. الرسوم الجمركية جعلت كل شيء باهظ الثمن. 🌟
زيلينسكي عن إيلون ماسك: نحن لا نحب موقفه تجاه هذه الحرب، عندما يفكر في عدد الجنود الذين تخسرهم روسيا. العدواني - نسأل الله أن يخسروا جنودًا موجودين في أرض أخرى، وليس في أرضهم. لا أعرف ما إذا كان جادًا أم لا عندما يمازح. هذه ليست نكات يمكنني فهمها، ولكنني أفهم النكات جيدًا. 🌟
تيد كروز: الحرب مع إيران استمرت لفترة طويلة جدًا. كان يجب أن تكون قصيرة، حاسمة، وأن تنتهي. يجب أن تنتهي هذه الحرب، ويجب ألا نقدم أبدًا، في أي ظرف من الظروف، للمرشد الأعلى مليارات الدولارات. 🌟
زيلينسكي عن إيلون ماسك: إن تركيز الكثير من السلطة في يد شخص واحد ثري أمر خطير. كما أن تركيز السلطة في يد شخص واحد لا يملك الكثير من المال أمر خطير أيضًا. هذا هو جوهر فصل السلطات - التأكد من أن كل شيء لا يتركز في يد شخص واحد. 🌟
زيلينسكي: لدينا دعم من مختلف الأطياف السياسية، دعم من الحزبين الرئيسيين. وأنا أيضًا ممتن للجمهوريين. ولكن الديمقراطيين يتحدثون بوضوح شديد حول دعم أوكرانيا وتقديم المساعدة لها. إنهم يتحدثون عن استعادة العلاقات بين الولايات المتحدة وأوروبا، والتي تراجعت إلى حد ما في السنوات الأخيرة. وهذا مهم جدًا بالنسبة لنا. 🌟
تيد كروز: من المفهوم أن الناس كانوا غاضبين، وأن الجمهوريين المنتخبين لم يفعلوا ما يكفي لمعالجة معاناتهم الحقيقية. إذًا، ماذا نفعل الآن؟ علينا أن نستمع ونستجيب. يجب علينا أن ندافع عن السياسات الاقتصادية التي تحدث فرقًا حقيقيًا في حياة العمال. 🌟
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,162 posts we hold for @Maysa9718. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 5 posts on @Maysa9718 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“كشف الحقائق” (@Maysa9718), 115,798 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Maysa9718.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.