Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for وعيد القسام 💚☝🏼

Channel

وعيد القسام 💚☝🏼

@Quasaam_2

Not marked by Telegram, checked 11 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,953subscribers

-1,270 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002212683324
TypeChannel
Username@Quasaam_2
Descriptionمعاكم على مدار 24 ساعه رابط مناقشات القناة https://t.me/+01LvxXC88ahmMDZk بوت القناة @Esoooooo123270BOT
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held65
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Quasaam_2

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also forms a group of 2 channels linked by matching posts. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (5 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@httpstjwFhjUvME4wN2Q6/53951 Nov 2026, 12:11 UTC@Quasaam_2/125562 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 23:47 UTC1.0012 hours
@httpstjwFhjUvME4wN2Q6/54287 Nov 2026, 12:28 UTC@Quasaam_2/125580 · this entry8 Nov 2026, 09:50 UTC0.9921 hours
@httpstjwFhjUvME4wN2Q6/53941 Nov 2026, 09:30 UTC@Quasaam_2/125561 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 23:44 UTC0.9814 hours
@httpstjwFhjUvME4wN2Q6/53961 Nov 2026, 16:22 UTC@Quasaam_2/125563 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 23:49 UTC0.987.5 hours
@httpstjwFhjUvME4wN2Q6/53971 Nov 2026, 17:32 UTC@Quasaam_2/125564 · this entry1 Nov 2026, 23:50 UTC0.926.3 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@httpstjwFhjUvME4wN2Q65 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9712 hours@httpstjwFhjUvME4wN2Q6 (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 5 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 8 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 2 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @httpstjwFhjUvME4wN2Q6. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 2 registered channels linked by matching posts. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

13,95315,22314,5887 August 202611 November 2026
65 measurements spanning 96 days, net -1,270. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,763–15,414 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 65
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 20:1113,953-15
9 Nov 2026, 23:1013,968-22
8 Nov 2026, 13:5013,990-12
7 Nov 2026, 10:4914,002-24
6 Nov 2026, 07:2914,026-4
5 Nov 2026, 07:5514,030-14
4 Nov 2026, 06:5714,044-22
3 Nov 2026, 03:5814,066-9
2 Nov 2026, 00:5814,075-14
31 Oct 2026, 23:4914,089-8
31 Oct 2026, 02:4914,097-10
30 Oct 2026, 05:0914,107-4
29 Oct 2026, 05:4014,111-18
28 Oct 2026, 04:5114,129-21
27 Oct 2026, 03:4014,150-10
26 Oct 2026, 02:2014,160-7
25 Oct 2026, 02:5414,167-28
23 Oct 2026, 23:3814,195-6
23 Oct 2026, 02:0714,201-21
22 Oct 2026, 00:3514,222first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.54%
avg views ÷ 13,953 subscribers
Avg views / post
216
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 23 of 37 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held56 (3 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total7,975
Reactions total207
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 19:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈24,800
Videos
≈16,700
Links
≈780

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 16m
Average length
15m 09s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

438 reactions across 42 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24054.8%
💔8018.3%
👍173.88%
🔥173.88%
💯153.42%
❤‍🔥143.20%
🫡143.20%
😢122.74%
🤣102.28%
⚡81.83%
🤬51.14%
🕊20.457%
😭20.457%
😡10.228%
🙏10.228%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 438 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 37 posts held from the last 30 days (5.41%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 09:12 UTC84 views7 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

الجاسوس حمزة المصري هو الذي حرض ونشر المعلومات الكاذبة حول مستشفى ناصر. واليوم يتم قصف المستشفى ويرتقي أكثر من 7 شهداء والعديد من الجرحى!! الفاتورة كبرت يا حمزة ودفع ثمنها قريب..

🤬5👍2

Signed حماس الروح 💚

11 Nov 2026, 23:51 UTC112 viewsread 12 November 2026

متابعة ميدانية خاصة : عرف من بين الشهداء جراء القصف على مستشفى ناصر الطبي بخانيونس كلا من : ١_ جهاد نعيم ابو تيلخ ٢_الدكتور رزق ابو شعيرة ٣_مراد ابو ظريفة ٤_سيف غازي ابو حطب ٥_خالد سليمان ابو عنزة ٦_ مجهول الهوية

Signed حماس الروح 💚

11 Nov 2026, 23:49 UTC108 viewsread 12 November 2026

حسبنا الله ونعم الوكيل ..

Signed حماس الروح 💚

11 Nov 2026, 23:49 UTC111 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

شهداء وجرحى خلال قصف مباشر لمجمع ناصر الطبي "مبنى الياسين"

Signed حماس الروح 💚

11 Nov 2026, 23:49 UTC106 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

استشهاد الدكتور رزق أبو شعيرة، جراء استهداف طيران الاحتلال مجمع ناصر الطبي

Signed حماس الروح 💚

11 Nov 2026, 23:48 UTC99 viewsread 12 November 2026

استهداف مستشفى في غزة عدد كبير من الاصابات يتجاوز الثلاثين وست شهداء

Signed حماس الروح 💚

11 Nov 2026, 23:48 UTC99 viewsread 12 November 2026

غزة يا الله 💔💔

Signed حماس الروح 💚

8 Nov 2026, 16:49 UTC228 views11 reactionsread 12 November 2026

هو الله سبحانه .. ليه نصر محمد ﷺ على الكفار بعد 23 سنة ... و ليه نصر نوح عليه السلام بعد 950 سنة .. و ليه نصر فتية الكهف بعد 300 سنة ... و ليه أخر فرعون بكل اجرامه طوال تلك المدة الى ان جاءت لحظة الغرق ... و ليه أخر انتصار يوسف الى ما بعد الرق ثم السجن ..... هيك تفكير عميق في سيرة الانبياء .. يقودك الى فهم أعمق لقوانين الله في الصراع بين الحق و الباطل ... أكان يجب على الله أن يخبر او يشرح لأي انسان كل صغيرة و كبيرة…

❤11

Signed حماس الروح 💚

8 Nov 2026, 09:50 UTC212 views10 reactionsread 12 November 2026

لن نندم أننا تاجرنا مع الله .... مين حكالك إنو التجارة مع الخالق هي إنك تركب على بساط الريح ... حكالك من 1450 سنة ... * إِنَّ اللَّهَ اشْتَرَىٰ مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ أَنفُسَهُمْ وَأَمْوَالَهُم بِأَنَّ لَهُمُ الْجَنَّةَ ۚ * 111 التوبة ... قد تدفع نفس و مالك مقابل الجنة ... الدفع هنا قد لا يكون اختياري .. قد يفرض عليك .. غصبن عنك .. المهم .. لازم تعرف و تتيقن .. أن هذا الالم و الوجع مش أبدي .. له نهاية ... نهاية قدرها و …

❤10

Signed حماس الروح 💚

8 Nov 2026, 09:49 UTC181 views9 reactionsread 12 November 2026

نحن لا نرى خياماً تغرق.. بل نرى نهاية العالم في مشهدِ غزة! ▪️ نحن لا نرى خياماً تغرق، وشعباً لا يعلمُ إلى أين يفرّ، وأطفالاً ترتجف، ومرضى عاجزين عن الهربِ من انهيارِ بقايا مبانٍ، وآلافاً لا يوجدُ أمامهم سوى بحرٍ هائجٍ من المنخفض؛ نحن نرى فرارَ أمةٍ من الفزعِ القادمِ، انتقاماً لصمتها، وجزعَ الشعوبِ من هولِ النارِ التي ستندلعُ فيهم، ونرى غضباً إلهياً وعدلاً، وحججاً على رقابِهم لا إعذارَ لها، وجرائمَ يتشاركُ فيها الكلُ…

❤9

Signed حماس الروح 💚

7 Nov 2026, 09:19 UTC205 views10 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

بينما ينشغل المسلمين اليوم في اطلاق الأحكام على بعضهم وفتاوى ليس لها من الواقع في شيء.. يعيشيون أجواء الشتاء ويصنعون ترنداته، غزة "2 مليون عربي مسلم" تمارس اليوم نوعاً آخر من المـ9ت، #الموت_غرقاً لا منقذ لنا إلا أنت، أنت حسبنا لا إله غيرك

❤10

Signed حماس الروح 💚

6 Nov 2026, 23:23 UTC220 views9 reactionsread 12 November 2026

عام 2027 ... ثُمَّ يَأْتِي مِن بَعْدِ ذَٰلِكَ عَامٌ فِيهِ يُغَاثُ النَّاسُ وَفِيهِ يَعْصِرُونَ (49) يوسف ... يا خالق الكون و مدبره .. اجعلها من نصيب المظلومين في غزة .... طيب الله ليلتكم .....

❤9

Signed حماس الروح 💚

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @Quasaam_2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Quasaam_2 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قناة الشهيد طه المداني
@AbuHasanAlMadani · 21,775
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 23 September 2026
قناة زوامل أنصارالله الرسمية
@Pufgyf200 · 47,366
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 25 August 2026
طـوفـان 7 أكــتوبــــر 𓂆🇵🇸
@VBnO4pp1lMzBi · 61,972
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 21 August 2026
كشف الحقائق
@Maysa9718 · 115,048
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 28 August 2026
الشهيد طاهر زكارنة🖤.
@taherzakarni · 44,523
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 26 August 2026
اخبار ذئاب الشمال_جنين✌️🇵🇸
@Aree3_jenin · 76,473
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 18 August 2026
اخبار فلسطين العاجلة 🇵🇸 ٢٤
@Djgfhjh · 89,314
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 August 2026
آرام نيوز - Aram News
@Pale313 · 27,067
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 9 September 2026
الصحفي علي سالم - غزة
@AliSalemps · 80,186
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 August 2026
حلب الأولى
@Aleppoonee · 102,399
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
اخبار القدس و فلسطين
@pales_jerus · 153,202
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
سرايا جنين 🖤🔥
@saraya2jinin · 70,449
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 August 2026
وكالة كوكل العراق الاخبارية
@Googlalsker1 · 94,078
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
أخبار لبنان غزة الآن والعالم♦️
@N_FFG · 110,628
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
تحفيزات دراسية🔷
@almshrgii · 118,179
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 13 August 2026
أخبار غزة الآن وفلسطين
@v_h33 · 106,836
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 14 August 2026
شبكة أخبار المحور
@akhbar_alme7war · 109,430
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 August 2026
Gaza Now_ غزة الآن
@GazaNowGaz · 174,936
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
اخبار ايران الأن لبنان
@Almustashaar2 · 141,567
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
شهابا رصدا الإخبارية
@mehwaralmokawma · 102,601
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 15 August 2026
الميدان الأن
@Almidanalan · 18,779
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 September 2026
شبكة القدس الإخبارية
@httpsBbmFFFhNGNi · 100,435
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 August 2026
محمود عيسى (صحفي)
@messa054 · 82,120
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 17 August 2026
تسريبات الحرب | إيران
@WarsLeaks · 50,944
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 33 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“وعيد القسام 💚☝🏼” (@Quasaam_2), 13,953 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Quasaam_2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.