Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Based Book Excerpts

@basedbooksreadings

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,922subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001625319395
TypeChannel
Username@basedbooksreadings
Created14 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/basedbooksreadings

Growth

2,9222,9252,923.56 August 2026 — 2,925 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,925 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,924 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,922 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,922–2,925 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:432,922-2
9 Aug 2026, 07:522,924-1
6 Aug 2026, 12:512,925no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:492,925first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
54s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

231 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11449.4%
🔥6427.7%
❤‍🔥156.49%
🙏156.49%
🤬135.63%
🕊104.33%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2025 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @basedbooksreadings. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 September 2025 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 19:59 UTC538 views14 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @JudgeSmoreCultPhoto

This looks like a promising project. He’s been at it for about a year and has translated 59 texts so far. They range in length from articles to full books. https://archive.org/details/@bookreview_archive I’m concerned that Internet Archive may take down the files now that he’s publicizing it, so I’ve mirrored his work to Telegram here: NS Literature Archive Mirror (Update: Florian is now the channel owner. I rema

11🔥3

20 Apr 2026, 04:57 UTC≈1,350 views3 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

Woman’s Trifling Needs by Mercy Otis Warren AN inventory clear of all she needs Lamira offers here; Nor does she fear a rigid Cato's frown When she lays by the rich embroidered gown, And modestly compounds for just enough- Perhaps, some dozens of more flighty stuff; With lawns and lustrings, blond, and Mechlin laces, Fringes and jewels, fans and tweezer-cases; memory Gay cloaks, and hats of every shape and size, Sca

3

20 Apr 2026, 04:56 UTC≈1,110 views4 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

An early critic of consumer culture in America was Mercy Otis Warren. A woman known as the conscience of the American Revolution. I’m currently going through her writing and came across and interesting satirical poem she wrote. The reference to Medea’s poisons underscores the perceived danger of luxury, suggesting consumption as a moral vulnerability. Interesting to reflect on how material inconvenience is often an

4

19 Apr 2026, 08:01 UTC963 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

THE TRUE FUNCTION OF THE NORMAL WOMAN MRS. HORACE A. DAVIS Anna Hallowell Davis, wife of Horace Davis; was educated in Boston private schools and is a graduate of Radcliffe College; was a member of Local School Board No. 46, New York City, for eight years; is a member of Brookline Civic Society, the North Bennett Street Industrial School Association, and of the Massachusetts Peace Association. J. A. H. The whole q

12

19 Apr 2026, 08:01 UTC≈1,290 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

On the other hand, where woman is stronger than he is in her feeling for the individual person, and her use of love rather than of law, neither the masculine nor the feminine gift is better, the one than the other, but the two work together as necessary parts of one whole. As Ida Tarbell puts it: "Human society may be likened [Pg 126] to two great circles, one revolving within the other. In the inner circle rules th

9

19 Apr 2026, 08:01 UTC954 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A neglected but very relevant topic to nationalist politics is the study of what the smart women had to say during their fight for suffrage. Many of the good arguments we hear today have their roots in the forgotten words of those women who tried to fight and speak out against the destruction of the natural order. We will publishing some essays and writings from anti suffrage women and possibly recording them into

16

8 Jan 2026, 11:13 UTC≈1,630 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SOTSBPhoto

An excerpt about the first Indians Father Andrew White met on his journey to Maryland A Brief Relation of the Voyage Unto Maryland By Father Andrew White 1634 “2 Canoes, of starknaked Indians came paddling aboard us, with paruats, pumpkins, muskmellons watermellons and the like to exchange with us; they much feared at first the greatnesse of our ship, ; we put out a white flag of peace, yet they desired we would

🔥4

2 Jan 2026, 02:57 UTC≈1,920 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A still small voice spake unto me, ‘Thou art so full of misery, Were it not better not to be?’ Then to the still small voice I said; ‘Let me not cast in endless shade What is so wonderfully made.’ To search thro’ all I felt or saw, The springs of life, the depths of awe, And reach the law within the law: ‘At least, not rotting like a weed, But, having sown some generous seed, Fruitful of further thought and deed,

12🕊2

30 Dec 2025, 08:55 UTC≈1,540 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

At Jewish social welfare agencies—an important site of Jewish employment and culture—workers lost their 82,000-member,social justice oriented union when the CIO expelled communists from its ranks. The National Jewish Welfare Board instructed local community organizations not to invite Communist speakers. The purges were broadly successful at separating Jewishness from leftism: By 1960, when young Jews flocked to Stud

🔥83🤬1

30 Dec 2025, 08:55 UTC≈1,120 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Came across a very good article written by far left jews and their infighting with AJC jews. I will post the link as well as some excerpts and commentary but my takeaway is that Jewish elites have done much work to stifle poorer and dumber jews who would be more obvious and less effective. The “more progressive jews” accuse them of diplomatic backroom deals rather than direct pressure. They accuse them of retreating

🔥53

30 Dec 2025, 07:57 UTC853 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

“There wouldn't be very much sense in having the 76-year-old president of a munitions factory or the flat-footed head of an international banking firm or the cross-eyed manager of a uniform manufacturing plant—all of whom see visions of tremendous profits in the event of war-voting on whether the nation should go to war or not. They never would be called upon to shoulder arms--to sleep in a trench and to be shot. Onl

🔥20

30 Dec 2025, 07:54 UTC795 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

“So capital won't permit the taking of the profit out of war until the people-those who do the suffering and still pay the price-make up their minds that those they elect to office shall do their bidding, and not that of the profiteers.” - Smedley Butler ”War is a Racket” 1934

10🕊3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @basedbooksreadings. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 595,884 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Based Book Excerpts” (@basedbooksreadings), 2,922 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/basedbooksreadings.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.