Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Media Tricks Exposed ✨

@mediatricks

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,656subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001435982362
TypeChannel
Username@mediatricks
Created10 May 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mediatricks

Growth

5,6565,6595,657.56 August 2026 — 5,659 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,659 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,657 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,658 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,656 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,656–5,659 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 09:125,656-2
9 Aug 2026, 17:425,658+1
6 Aug 2026, 23:345,657-2
6 Aug 2026, 10:325,659no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:505,659first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 13 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

8 Sept 2025, 17:17 UTC≈48,100 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @JudgeSmoreCultPhoto

The article goes on to blame “the rising number of surveillance cameras in public spaces” for falsely creating the impression that black violent crime is a problem.

8 Sept 2025, 17:17 UTC≈46,400 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @JudgeSmoreCultPhoto

Axios has finally reported on the brutal black-on-White knife murder of Iryna Zarutska with the headline “Grisly Charlotte stabbing video fuels MAGA’s crime message.” “MAGA influencers are drawing repeated attention to violent attacks to elevate the issue of urban crime — and accuse mainstream media of under-covering shocking cases.” https://www.axios.com/2025/09/08/iryna-zarutska-stabbing-video-republicans-maga h

8 Sept 2025, 12:28 UTC≈29,100 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @demacrePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

10 Jul 2025, 17:19 UTC≈23,100 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @JudgeSmoreCultPhoto

This seems like a slightly dishonest way of framing “we toppled the government and installed a puppet who agrees with us.” https://archive.ph/Cq6ID https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/09/world/middleeast/syria-israel-talks.html

25 Nov 2024, 18:48 UTC≈15,100 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @The_Course_of_EmpirePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

19 Aug 2024, 11:31 UTC≈15,200 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @millennialwoesPhoto

The interesting thing about this is that almost exactly the same thing was done in Chemnitz, Germany, in 2018. A killing by a migrant led to several anti-migration protests. To stop this rhetoric taking hold, the establishment put on a concert, had it broadcast on a dozen different radio stations, and bussed in antifa from all over Germany to attend it to create a show of strength, vastly outnumbering the anti-migrat

5 Aug 2024, 08:22 UTC≈13,200 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @keith_woodsPhoto

In 2011, there were riots across Britain over the police killing an armed black criminal This is a taste of how the media covered that case of widespread disorder. X 🔗

29 Jul 2024, 22:26 UTC≈10,800 viewsread 12 August 2026

Archived links: 🔗 Kamala Harris search results 🔗 Donald Trump search results

29 Jul 2024, 22:17 UTC≈34,400 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

When you search Google News for Donald Trump, your search query is changed to "harris, donald trump"

13 Jul 2024, 23:48 UTC≈25,900 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Apparently, Trump is safe after he got startled and fell because of a popping sound, and Trump supporters are angry about it.

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mediatricks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 349,867 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Media Tricks Exposed ✨” (@mediatricks), 5,656 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mediatricks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.