Channel
@mediatricks
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,598subscribers
-61 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001435982362 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @mediatricks |
| Created | 10 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 16 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/mediatricks |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 22:37 | 5,598 | -12 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 5,610 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 5,612 | -8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 5,620 | +5 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:41 | 5,615 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:25 | 5,625 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 21:28 | 5,628 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 5,629 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 5,630 | -15 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 5,645 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 5,649 | -7 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 5,656 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 5,658 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 5,657 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 5,659 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:50 | 5,659 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 13 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
The article goes on to blame “the rising number of surveillance cameras in public spaces” for falsely creating the impression that black violent crime is a problem.
Axios has finally reported on the brutal black-on-White knife murder of Iryna Zarutska with the headline “Grisly Charlotte stabbing video fuels MAGA’s crime message.” “MAGA influencers are drawing repeated attention to violent attacks to elevate the issue of urban crime — and accuse mainstream media of under-covering shocking cases.” https://www.axios.com/2025/09/08/iryna-zarutska-stabbing-video-republicans-maga h…
Photo, posted without a caption
This seems like a slightly dishonest way of framing “we toppled the government and installed a puppet who agrees with us.” https://archive.ph/Cq6ID https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/09/world/middleeast/syria-israel-talks.html
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
The interesting thing about this is that almost exactly the same thing was done in Chemnitz, Germany, in 2018. A killing by a migrant led to several anti-migration protests. To stop this rhetoric taking hold, the establishment put on a concert, had it broadcast on a dozen different radio stations, and bussed in antifa from all over Germany to attend it to create a show of strength, vastly outnumbering the anti-migrat…
In 2011, there were riots across Britain over the police killing an armed black criminal This is a taste of how the media covered that case of widespread disorder. X 🔗
Archived links: 🔗 Kamala Harris search results 🔗 Donald Trump search results
When you search Google News for Donald Trump, your search query is changed to "harris, donald trump"
Apparently, Trump is safe after he got startled and fell because of a popping sound, and Trump supporters are angry about it.
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @mediatricks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Media Tricks Exposed ✨” (@mediatricks), 5,598 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mediatricks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.