Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 阿龙闯荡记·真实东南亚🫆

Channel

阿龙闯荡记·真实东南亚🫆

@blj11

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

28,533subscribers

-20,991 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001994469530
TypeChannel
Usernames@baoliaojie @blj11
Description#东南亚 #柬埔寨 #菲律宾 #迪拜 #缅甸 #泰国 为了符合电报用户喜好,电报版《爆料届·阿龙闯荡记》将融合柬埔寨以及周边国家各类突发事件,园区爆料和八卦为广大用户带来精彩的东南亚华人生活资讯! 投稿: @zsdny 本频道谢绝任何政治敏感新闻,仅供参考
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held125
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/blj11

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@bobei_dsj/532937 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC@blj11/12946 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC1.00under a minute
@bobei_dsj/533288 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC@blj11/12964 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC1.00under a minute
@blj11/13099 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 22:03 UTC@bobei_dsj/534849 Aug 2026, 22:04 UTC1.00under a minute
@bobei_dsj/5350110 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC@blj11/13103 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC1.00under a minute
@bobei_dsj/5351110 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC@blj11/13114 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 06:49 UTC1.00under a minute
@bobei_dsj/5352110 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC@blj11/13123 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@bobei_dsj31 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (30–1)
@Jpz56522 (6/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (18–4)
@DNY_hadsj22 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@DNY_hadsj (13–9)
@p555918 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.992.5 hours@p5559 (18–0)
@xg_cdj17 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.6 hoursthis entry (17–0)
@blj7716 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.93under a minutethis entry (12–4)
@DNYFLBDSJ15 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.008 minutesthis entry (14–1)
@bbsooo11 (6/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.992.5 hours@bbsooo (10–1)
@dnywww10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.3 hours@dnywww (9–1)
@TGHH6610 (7/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9919 hourseven
@bl5138 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0025 minutesthis entry (8–0)
@XGRIJI8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003.4 hours@XGRIJI (6–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 102 of the 102 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,460 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 12 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

28,53349,52439,028.57 August 202611 November 2026
125 measurements spanning 96 days, net -20,991. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,384–52,673 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 125
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 18:0828,533-141
10 Nov 2026, 15:5828,674-67
9 Nov 2026, 21:5928,741-84
9 Nov 2026, 02:5628,825-49
8 Nov 2026, 14:0728,874-109
7 Nov 2026, 21:2028,983-62
7 Nov 2026, 08:5029,045-146
6 Nov 2026, 18:1929,191-24
6 Nov 2026, 07:2029,215-60
5 Nov 2026, 16:0929,275-38
5 Nov 2026, 06:2029,313-27
4 Nov 2026, 15:1029,340-23
4 Nov 2026, 02:2729,363-44
3 Nov 2026, 16:3729,407-28
3 Nov 2026, 05:3029,435-50
2 Nov 2026, 18:1929,485-46
2 Nov 2026, 03:2029,531-34
1 Nov 2026, 16:2729,565-177
1 Nov 2026, 01:4929,742no change
31 Oct 2026, 18:3729,742first reading

Engagement

1,807 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 181 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.107%
avg views ÷ 28,533 subscribers
Avg views / post
30.4
625 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
625
of 1,807 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held1,807 (7 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total19,020
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 12:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈15,800
Videos
≈4,060
Links
≈3,240

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 54m
Average length
53s

Measured directly from 263 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

153 reactions across 81 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 59272770729080297303019.6%
custom 59291911809180668622315.0%
custom 61544273533437296282113.7%
custom 62018182200562877832013.1%
custom 59294708090588402181811.8%
custom 61566800379206779941811.8%
custom 62037894253615586451610.5%
custom 606450260945509362774.58%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 153 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 24 September 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 625 posts held from the last 30 days (0.16%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 11:22 UTC18 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

中国总理访泰在即!泰方敲定重点合作议题 泰国副总理兼外长西哈萨对外官宣:中国国务院总理李强将于11月13日—14日正式访问泰国,此次访问是深化中泰全面战略伙伴关系的重要契机,双方将围绕多项核心议题深度磋商。 针对近期的旅游安全争议,泰方将专项向中方说明泰国整体安全状况,澄清涉事人员并非普通游客,全力提振中方游客对泰国旅游环境的信心。 执法合作层面,中泰将进一步联手打击电信网络诈骗、跨境犯罪,强化两国执法联动,追查涉案人员、整治相关灰色产业链。 经贸领域是本次会谈重点,双方计划扩大双边贸易与双向投资,重点解决泰国对华贸易逆差、贸易失衡问题。同时拓展电动汽车、新兴产业合作赛道,推动两国高新产业落地发展。 此外,双方已敲定将研讨2027年中泰“2+2”部长级对话机制,由两国外长、防长参与,深化外交、国防两大领域深度合作。

12 Nov 2026, 11:10 UTC17 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

🇱🇰斯里兰卡外交部警告:切勿持旅游签证出国打工,谨防诈骗及人口贩卖! 斯里兰卡外交与旅游部近日发出警告,越来越多斯里兰卡公民因持旅游签证(Visit Visa)出国寻找工作而陷入困境。 据悉,一些不法分子以马来西亚、阿联酋迪拜、阿曼等地的高薪工作为诱饵,诱骗求职者出国。 不少人抵达目的地后,发现根本没有承诺的工作,或遭遇工资低于约定、拖欠薪资等问题,甚至成为人口贩卖及诈骗活动的受害者。 部分人员还因签证及工作手续不合法,面临被捕、拘留或遣返的风险。 斯里兰卡外交部强烈呼吁民众,不要持旅游签证出国务工。 所有计划出国务工的人员,必须向斯里兰卡外国就业局(SLBFE)登记,并通过合法程序办理相关手续后再出国。

12 Nov 2026, 10:59 UTC6 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ #柬埔寨大事件上押100万U 🫥首存重磅迎新豪礼10666U! 🫥首次充值最高可领取16666U 🫥二存三存豪礼加赠狂送福利不断 🫥层层加码福利 让您的资金翻倍起飞 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 实力不是口说,是长期稳定运营! 😔正版游戏 · 顶级运营 · 福利超多 😔上亿储备 · 布局全球 · 大额无忧 🚀快速体验入口: 亚洲国际机器人: 开始游戏 亚洲国际导航网址: YZGJ.VIP PP电子5万倍已在亚洲国际娱乐诞生 PG电子1000u赏金大对决爆奖5000倍 🎁更多惊喜传奇等你开启 ⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡⚡ 电子 百家乐 0风控 包出款 限红拉到爆 提现秒到账 您的娱乐首选 尽在亚洲国际娱乐👇 ✅福利频道: @YZGJ9 ✈️客服专员: @YZGJKF 🌎注册网址: yz88.vip

12 Nov 2026, 10:50 UTC21 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

#群友爆料:马来西亚吉隆坡避雷此女! 作为一个妈咪助理,长期压榨扶手工资,也不给结账。就因为上班朋友发了一个信息给我,我回复了一下,客人并未投诉,她就私自想吞我的平台费,不想给钱。 此女长期在吸毒,上头了就直接跟客人在厕所打泡,已经中毒两次了。仗着自己是妈咪助理,经常吞女孩子的钱,都是不用经过落实情况的,直接一句话,女孩子不爽就直接不给钱。还以为吉隆坡是你们家开的呢!动不动就让人待不下去。你以为你原来的东北绑架团伙做的事没人知道吗? 这个钱你不给,就是想私吞!各位女孩,你见到此人发单,请记得避雷一下!经常随便找借口不给结账,把钱私吞了!!!

12 Nov 2026, 10:36 UTC21 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

云南临沧边境抓获偷渡“偷引带”蛇头4人 近日,云南省临沧市镇康县边境巡防警力在南伞边境山间便道开展巡逻时,查获一起涉嫌组织人员偷越国(边)境案件,抓获涉案人员4名,劝返准备偷渡人员7名。 经初步调查,涉案人员通过短视频平台、社交软件发布境外高薪招工信息,诱骗外省人员,并计划带领人员经山间小路偷渡前往缅甸果敢。现场查扣用于接送的摩托车3辆,并收缴手机及相关聊天、引流记录。 目前,涉案人员已依法处理,案件正在进一步办理中,警方正继续追查上游境外联络人员。

12 Nov 2026, 09:47 UTC39 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

小姐姐口述她的一位朋友在泰国被绑架,家人支付了300万元赎金,最后人还是没能回来: 我前两天不是发了一个视频,就是说提到我这个朋友在泰国被绑了,赎金给完了,人一样没有回来这件事吗?没想到受到这么大的关注。首先,我谢谢大家对这件事的关注。 我当时发这个视频,是因为听到这件事非常震惊,想分享一下自己的看法,顺便提醒大家出行一定要注意安全,不要抱有任何侥幸心理。 就像我这个朋友,他本人非常聪明,在生意场上打拼多年,是福建人,很早就拿到了加拿大国籍,在泰国做了很久生意。他肯定听说过电诈这类事情,但为什么还是上当了?就是因为每个人心里都有侥幸心理,总觉得坏事不会发生在自己身上。但你永远不要低估一场为你量身定制的骗局。 这两天我又打听了一下,我这个朋友其实两三个月前就已经失踪了。我知道这件事,还是前几天,因为我们很久没联系了。大概情况是,有人叫他去万象,说有矿,具体什么矿我不知道。他去了万象之后,就再也没回来。他账户里的钱,家人现在…

12 Nov 2026, 09:26 UTC40 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#群友投稿:越南十大错觉,你中了几个? 有些人来一趟越南,钱没赚到多少,感情倒是投入了不少。刚开始以为遇到了真爱,后来才发现,自己可能只是别人故事里的一个过客。越南的爱情,有时候甜得让人忘记现实,也让人心甘情愿地一次次掏出钱包。 1. 她喜欢的是我这个人,不是冲着我的u 2. 她是真迷上我了,什么心里话都愿意跟我说 3. 她还在读大学,肯定很单纯 4. 她家条件不好,是真的需要我帮一把 5. 她和我聊天, 是因为真的爱我 6. 她没有男朋友、没有孩子,也没结过婚 7. 她没跟我提钱,就是真心喜欢我 8. 我们以后可以一起盖房子,她不要嫁妆 9. 她说我和别的中国人不一样,我很特别 10. 我跟自己说,这是我最后一次来越南 最扎心的不是这些错觉,而是明明知道可能是错觉,却还是忍不住相信

12 Nov 2026, 08:58 UTC35 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#泰国11月12日消息:泰国移民局在曼谷开展跨国追逃行动,抓获一名41岁被中国警方通缉的中国籍男子刘某。 刘某涉嫌运营名为“皇冠体育”的足球博彩平台,平台登记账户超4000个,涉案资金流水逾500亿泰铢(该金额为交易流水,不等同于平台盈利)。刘某原本只是博彩参与者,之后成为该赌博平台合伙人,参与经营管理,在国内案发后潜逃至泰国,持合法签证藏匿于曼谷素坤逸路亿甲迈的高档公寓,日常行踪低调。 本次线索由中国驻泰国大使馆向泰方提供,泰国移民局第一分局经5天摸排锁定其住处与活动规律,于11月12日趁其外出到便利店采购时实施抓捕。 泰国移民局已撤销他的居留许可,将其移交调查部门,后续将和中方协作推进遣返流程。目前刘某尚未遣返,平台运营模式、资金流向以及其他涉案人员仍在调查当中。

12 Nov 2026, 08:32 UTC34 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#缅甸资讯:全国清查外籍人士,突击核查住宿、从业信息! 缅甸移民监督与人口部副部长吴林佐吞表示,对于持各类入境签证入境后违反签证规定的外国人,正在进行拘押处理。对于非法入境者,正依法采取追责措施。 11月10日举行的第三届人民议会第三次例行会议第26天会议上,波巴迪依镇区选区人民议会代表吴拉穗询问,是否有计划对包括仰光、曼德勒、东枝、毛淡棉在内的全国范围内非法外国人进行审查并遣返原籍国,副部长作出了上述答复。 据悉,2015年至2020年期间,被逮捕、追责并驱逐出境的外国人共3545人;2021年至2026年9月期间,因违反签证规定和非法偷渡,依据缅甸移民监管法被判刑完毕并驱逐出境者4406人,正在服刑的外国人2533人。 此外,基于两国友好关系以及使馆的请求,因无其他犯罪行为而未予起诉即驱逐出境的外国人共有73085人。 目前,正在对外国人入境申报表FormC/e-FormC进行核查,在实地开展外国人是否真实居住和从…

12 Nov 2026, 08:09 UTC35 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

电诈园区变“提款机”?西港窃贼专盯无人空楼,又有2人落网 随着柬埔寨持续重拳打击网络诈骗,西港大量曾经熙熙攘攘的园区和私人建筑人去楼空。然而,这些空置的大楼,如今却成了窃贼眼中的“香饽饽”。 据西港市第4分区警察局通报,近期有不法分子专门潜入无人看守的私人建筑内,盗窃建筑材料、铁件及设备。11月12日下午,警方再次展开行动,抓获了两名涉案嫌疑人。 据警方通报,被抓获的两名嫌疑人分别是一名柬埔寨籍男子和一名印度尼西亚籍男子。目前,两人已被警方控制,将依法受到惩处。这也是西港警方近期连续破获的又一起针对空置大楼的盗窃案。 这起看似普通的盗窃案,折射出西港目前的魔幻现状。在打击电诈的高压态势下,大量诈骗园区和灰产大楼被查封或废弃。由于这些建筑往往体量庞大且无人管理,不仅成了城市治安的盲区,也吸引了各路小偷前去“零元购”,偷拆里面的电线、铁架等设施变卖。

12 Nov 2026, 08:03 UTC32 viewsread 12 November 2026
Photo

#马来西亚资讯:沙巴突查仙本那度假村!7名中国男子持旅游签证非法工作被捕,涉事度假村无营业执照 11月11日报道,马来西亚沙巴州移民局近日展开联合执法行动,突击检查仙本那(Semporna)一家涉嫌非法经营的度假村,发现7名中国籍男子涉嫌滥用社交访问准证(Social Visit Pass)从事工作,当场将其扣留。 此次行动于11月8日至9日在沙巴州斗湖(Tawau)及仙本那两地展开,由沙巴州移民局局长拿督SH Sitti Saleha Habib Yussof率队,共出动102名执法人员,对6处场所展开检查,累计检查324人。 根据移民局公布的调查结果,执法人员在仙本那一家度假村检查时,最初对9名中国籍人员及5名当地人进行身份核查,随后发现其中7名中国籍男子涉嫌违反社交访问准证规定,利用旅游访问身份非法工作。 进一步调查还发现,该度假村不仅没有提交外籍员工聘用申请,也没有取得仙本那县议会营业执照及旅游经营许可证。涉事场…

12 Nov 2026, 07:56 UTC36 viewsread 12 November 2026
Video

#吃瓜 #双飞 #酒店 2个女的到底是怎么调教出来的?

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,807 posts we hold for @blj11. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

柬埔寨大事件 @blj77
@blj77 · 163,618
#1
东南亚大事件️
@dsj818 · 130,890
#2
💎【伊伊】文案头像素材吧💎
@wenanq · 267
#3
只是文案
@wenan565656 · 5,199
#4
柬埔寨華人信息
@jpz_888 · 12,123
#5
东南亚大事件 @svip
@bx666 · 462,405
#6
西港日记|柬埔寨大事件
@xgrj0 · 148,875
#7
文案/励志/情感
@RZ1788 · 2,630
#8
|高龙岛|旅游|酒店|外海海钓|专业钓鱼艇
@gaolongdaodaozhu · 1,429
#9
emo_朋友圈
@wangyiy1 · 4,283
#10
亚太文案 | 缅甸文案 |木姐文案 | 东南亚文案 | 🇲🇲
@wenanguanjxb · 4,947
#11
头像 文案 壁纸 鸡汤 分享
@wasc001 · 1,734
#12
七月月弯弯文案馆🍺
@wenanya · 2,791
#13
缅北悬赏通缉令(吃瓜)❖盈丰娱乐冠名🅥
@DNYTJL3 · 84,052
#14
🌈心情文案馆🌈
@xqw3344 · 728
#15
DJ阿肖音乐频道
@DjAXRemix · 10,674
#16
灵魂🫦文案馆
@wenanle · 4,750
#17
西港日记|柬埔寨大事件
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,007
#18
🍼美女头像壁纸素材🍼
@meinv00857 · 3,646
#19
华强/东南亚漂流记包厢文化
@vvw555555 · 2,756
#20
日暮温柔馆
@dj17wenan · 1,322
#21
🍭木姐晚风依旧温柔 🍭
@wenanquno · 1,057
#22
人间清醒【文案馆】
@wenanhs1 · 28,032
#23
海外大事件 @USD1
@usd1 · 254,597 (as read 26 August 2026)
#24
吃瓜东南亚头条㊖
@CG887 · 95,250
#25
🦄奇闻趣事 吃瓜新闻
@n12345 · 1,693
#26
生活情感文案风景频道馆
@wxhnww016 · 2,157
#27
华人圈-不入爱河💦
@wenanba0 · 969
#28
东南亚文案馆
@wenan77 · 9,439
#29
东南亚大新闻
@HYY3333 · 101,669
#30
头条新闻💥搞笑视频
@z055q · 24,302
#31
柬城科技
@JCSVIPA3 · 611
#32
🔥東莱娱乐城🔥电子•捕鱼•视讯•棋牌•彩票•体育
@DLYL33333 · 4,634
#33
🔥双狮国际娱乐🔥视讯.电子.捕鱼.棋牌.
@SSGJYL · 23,791
#34
🔥PG娱乐城PG28.com【实力招商】🔥
@PG28zhaoshang · 1,392
#35
小魔王头像馆🍎
@chenxichenxi8 · 13,995
#36
壁纸 📸 头像 写真
@bizhi110 · 22,414
#37
表情包😍 贴纸包🤩
@biaoqing6688 · 968
#38
足不出户看世界各地
@haoche1314 · 2,694
#39
ភូមិកីឡា-Phoum Sport
@topsoupterkseang168 · 682
#40

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

东南亚大事件️
@dsj818 · 130,890
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 23 here — alongside 22 others — read 14 August 2026
西港日记|柬埔寨大事件
@xgrj0 · 148,875
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 21 here — alongside 20 others — read 12 August 2026
柬埔寨大事件 @blj77
@blj77 · 163,618
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 27 here — alongside 26 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“阿龙闯荡记·真实东南亚🫆” (@blj11), 28,533 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blj11.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.