Channel
@HR_Perezagruzka
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,080subscribers
-65 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001240120192 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HR_Perezagruzka |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HR_Perezagruzka |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 7,080 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:39 | 7,086 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 7,094 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:02 | 7,095 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:34 | 7,109 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:11 | 7,125 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 7,124 | +29 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 7,095 | -10 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:52 | 7,105 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 7,106 | -15 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 7,121 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 7,131 | -11 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:51 | 7,142 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 7,145 | first reading |
31 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 31 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
186 reactions across 31 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 101 | 54.3% | |
| 👍 | 38 | 20.4% | |
| 🔥 | 34 | 18.3% | |
| 💯 | 5 | 2.69% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 2.15% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.61% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.538% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 186 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сентябрь на носу, а значит пора букировать свободные слоты под полезные встречи! Мы начнем: приглашаем всех на практический вебинар 🔥Как находить кандидатов, когда стандартного поиска недостаточно🔥, который пройдет 17 сентября в 11:00 по мск Спикеры: - Егор Яценко, основатель проекта Sourcing School - Максим Фёдоров, эксперт по HR-автоматизации Talantix Чтобы закрывать редкие вакансии, нужен особый подход. Стандарт…
❤2👍1
🔝Репетиция с нейросетью: новая норма или тревожный звоночек? Сотрудники перестали стесняться задавать вопросы… только вот кому? Сначала — искусственному интеллекту, и только потом — руководителю.Совместное исследование hh.ru и Level Group показывает интересную динамику: ➡️ 65% обсуждают задачу с ИИ, прежде чем идти к начальству. ➡️ 48% не заметили изменений в общении, но 12% признались: они стали меньше говорить с …
👍2❤1💯1😱1
19 августа, 11:00 по мск, вебинар «Индекс вежливости на hh.ru: всё, что нужно знать работодателю» Оставляем тут для интересующихся полезный пост о том, что завтра мы расскажем важное 😉 Вы наверняка сталкивались с индексом вежливости компании, когда работали с вакансиями на hh.ru. Но знаете ли вы, для чего нужен этот показатель на самом деле и как его видят соискатели? ✅На вебинаре разберём, на что на самом деле вл…
❤1👍1
Posted without readable text
❤1🔥1
Posted without readable text
🔥3❤1👍1
Сегодня хотим вас отвлечь темой, как будто из детства и поговорить про учителей 👩🏫 Помните своего первого учителя? А хотели ли вы стать учителем, когда были маленькими? Как считаете ИИ как-то повлияет на эту профессию и если да, то как? А с чем у вас ассоциируется эта профессия: может быть с выгоранием и постоянным стрессом или благодарностью, цветами и поддержкой, или быть может с экзаменами или, наоборот, длинным…
❤3
💥 Уже планируете, какие профильные мероприятия посетить осенью? Отметьте в календаре 8 октября ❤️ В этот день в Москве пройдёт Headconf 2026 — конференция, которая позволит разобраться, как меняется рынок труда и какую роль в этих изменениях играют технологии, люди и бизнес. Запланировать участие стоит уже сегодня, и вот почему. На Headconf Дмитрий Сергиенков, CEO hh.ru, поделится опытом автоматизации и расскажет,…
❤4👍1
Результаты ИИ-помощника для рекрутера за 8 месяцев работы Хэдхантер запустил ИИ-помощника в конце ноября 2025 года. Тогда технология была доступна ~5% пользователей платформы hh․ru, и уже в начале 2026 года доступ получили практически все работодатели. 🔝Ключевые цифры, которыми мы гордимся: - 23,7 тыс. работодателе уже используют ИИ-помощника - 57 тыс. вакансий сгенерированно - 14,5 млн диалогов с кандидатами прове…
❤3🔥2👍1
Posted without readable text
❤4👍3🔥2
Posted without readable text
❤2👍1🔥1
💥Полезные встречи в середине августа с экспертами hh.ru ✅ 18 августа, 11:00 по мск, вебинар: «HR-бренд как актив: от стратегии к конкретным проектам» По данным Dream Job, 72% сотрудников сравнивают своего работодателя с другими компаниями отрасли по отзывам, а 80,7% соискателей отказываются от работодателей с плохой репутацией*. Поэтому сильный HR-бренд — уже не имиджевая история, а актив, который влияет на найм и у…
❤2
🗣️ Сегодня поговорим о том, как страшно и важно выходить на диалог с командой в годину больших (и чаще всего стремных скажем уж как есть) перемен 1️⃣ Дано: сложный (мягко говоря) рынок. Это чувствуют все, начиная от топ-менеджеров и до линейного персонала. И в такие периоды, как в кризисы 2008-го или 2020-го, компании, которые замыкаются в кабинетах и транслируют только «официальную позицию», теряют скорость, а пото…
🤝4❤2💯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @HR_Perezagruzka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HR Перезагрузка” (@HR_Perezagruzka), 7,080 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HR_Perezagruzka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.