Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 14 days, net +1,437. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,785–10,790 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
20 Aug 2026, 00:28
10,559
+1,390
13 Aug 2026, 01:03
9,169
+153
9 Aug 2026, 22:11
9,016
-98
6 Aug 2026, 23:10
9,114
-8
6 Aug 2026, 02:52
9,122
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:45
9,122
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.5%
avg views ÷ 10,559 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held
20 (19 July 2026 – 19 August 2026)
Views total
23,810
Reactions total
413
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 16:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,400
Videos
≈645
Links
≈1,360
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
9m 28s
Average length
57s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
442 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
176
39.8%
🔥
118
26.7%
🎉
59
13.3%
😍
22
4.98%
👍
14
3.17%
👏
12
2.71%
❤🔥
7
1.58%
💯
5
1.13%
😱
4
0.905%
🥰
4
0.905%
🍓
3
0.679%
🍾
3
0.679%
💘
3
0.679%
🙈
3
0.679%
🥴
3
0.679%
👌
1
0.226%
💋
1
0.226%
🙏
1
0.226%
🤔
1
0.226%
🤣
1
0.226%
1 further kind
1
0.226%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 442reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Есть актеры, которые приходят в профессию с четким планом. А Сергей Городничий, кажется, скорее ведом любопытством и интересом к жизни – и каждый раз оказывается в новом месте, в новой ситуации.
В детстве он семь лет серьезно занимался тхэквондо и мечтал об Олимпиаде, потом совершенно случайно влюбился в театр, оставил спорт и стал актером... И вот весной я вручала звезде сериала «Ландыши» премию «Аванс», а теперь о…
Аааа, она снова это сделала!! Катя Волкова обрила голову, как когда-то.
Нет, конечно, когда женщина по-настоящему красива (а Екатерина – одна из самых красивых актрис нашего кино!), то от нее даже лысой глаз не отвести. Но само видео смотреть крайне волнительно!🙈
Есть поздравления с днем рождения, которые особенно приятно получать. Например, от театра, с котором связано столько потрясающих воспоминаний, что уже хочется считать его отдельной главой жизни.
«Современник» – как раз такой случай. Только за последний год здесь были «Мещане» Павла Сафонова – спектакль тяжелый, нервный, местами почти физически невыносимый и оттого еще более запоминающийся. Мы писали о нем в «КиноРеп…
Мимими месяца!
59-летняя Сальма Хайек (впервые) стала бабушкой. Своего новорожденного внука Франсуа она ласково называет Панчито (уменьшительно-ласкательное от Панчо, мексиканская вариация имени Франсиско).
Мне, кстати, вспомнилась такая поговорка: «Дети – черновик, а внуки – чистовик». Не знаю, не было еще возможности ее проверить, но то, что из Хайек выходит супер-бабушка (при том, что насчет супер-мамы не уверен…
Спасибо всем за поздравления!! И так хочется поделиться этим жаром любви с вами. Но личные письма – это лишь для меня, а вот фильм, который мои друзья подарили мне к юбилею, я хочу вам показать как свою гордость, радость и благодарность всем-всем, кто рядом!❤️
Сегодня 100 лет со дня рождения Валентины Левко – солистки Большого театра, великой певицы с редчайшим контральто.
Многие годы она прославляла нашу страну, выступая на лучших площадках мира – в Ла Скала, Ковент-Гардене, Венской опере, Карнеги-холле, Альберт-холле. Ей рукоплескали стоя, ее боготворили, при этом певица не только выступала. В Гнесинке, своей альма-матер, она вырастила целое поколение выдающихся исполни…
Сентябрьский «КиноРепортер» получился одним из тех номеров, которые особенно приятно держать в руках. В нем много разных историй, но все они – про людей, кино и те перемены, которые происходят с ними за кадром и на экране.
Главный герой номера – лауреат «Аванса» Сергей Городничий. Со звездой «Ландышей» мы поговорили о профессии, отцовстве, любви к смешению жанров и его работе в новом сериале «Дубровский. Русский Зор…
Подводный мир для меня всегда был чем-то совершенно магическим. Мы знаем о нем гораздо меньше, чем нам кажется, а его обитатели порой выглядят так, будто прибыли из далекой фантастической галактики.
Наверное, поэтому одним из самых сильных впечатлений в моей жизни стала встреча с китами. В начале этого года мне посчастливилось плавать рядом с изумительными гигантами, и я до сих пор вспоминаю это чувство абсолютного …
Летняя Испания – это не только победа на чемпионате по футболу, которую вся страна отмечала несколько дней. Это еще и карнавалы. И одним из самых эффектных я считаю валенсианский Moros y Cristianos (в переводе «Мавры и христиане»).
Это зажигательное и во всех смыслах жаркое шоу кружит южную Испанию целую неделю. А готовятся местные жители к нему целый год. И морально, и физически. Все эти потрясающие костюмы шьются …
В этот жаркий день, думаю, каждый хотел бы оказаться на его месте. А не вот это все)
Всем хорошего завершения выходных!
👍3💯3❤1🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @maria_lemesheva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@maria_lemesheva edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 4,111 of 1,568,528entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@maria_lemesheva named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rian_ru named in 4 posts, 8 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Мария Лемешева” (@maria_lemesheva), 10,559 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/maria_lemesheva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
