Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Маша и Медиа

Channel

Маша и Медиа

@Vaaasha_Masha

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,441subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001648748309
TypeChannel
Username@Vaaasha_Masha
Created24 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Vaaasha_Masha

Growth

3,4333,4413,4376 August 2026 — 3,433 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,433 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,435 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,439 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,441 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,432–3,442 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 00:553,441+2
10 Aug 2026, 02:113,439+4
6 Aug 2026, 15:413,435+2
6 Aug 2026, 04:373,433no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:383,433first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.5%
avg views ÷ 3,441 subscribers
Avg views / post
912
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (6 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total13,679
Reactions total161
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 23:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

225 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6528.9%
👎5223.1%
🔥4218.7%
👍2812.4%
👏104.44%
🤯104.44%
😁52.22%
🤔52.22%
🤬41.78%
😢31.33%
😱10.444%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC304 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @badguydiePhoto

Понятно, напряжение в воздухе хоть руби топором – но удивительно, что триггером к выплеску всеобщего недовольства стал именно «Колобок». То есть, конечно, сами создатели фильма пережестили (я про нашумевшую историю с электриком – это без комментариев). Уверен, фильм бы в итоге защитил себя сам – сарафан был бы положительный. И, надеюсь, будет.

👍4🤔1

5 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC551 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Иногда на творящее вокруг безумие нужно отвечать таким же безумием. Это я про кейс «Колобка» и «Человека-паука», который уже вышел за рамки здравого смысла. И очевидно, что привычные антикризисные меры здесь не сработают. Как вариант – допустить в теневой прокат «Человека-паука» уже в ближайший уик-энд. Ну, да – показывать как обычно в рамках предсеансного обслуживания. Но только вместо привычных короткометражек пр

👎21👍6🤯3

5 Aug 2026, 10:28 UTC548 viewsread 7 August 2026

После того, как правообладателей прокатили в ходе принятия закона об ИИ, кажется, шансы на то, что их интересы все же будут учтены, есть. В конце июля президент Владимир Путина дал поручение правительству и профильным организациям подготовить поправки в законодательство, которые призваны защитить интересы правообладателей при использовании контента для обучения систем искусственного интеллекта (ИИ), рассказали «Ведо

4 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC691 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Про внезапный уход с поста ректора ГИТИСа. Собеседники "Ведомостей" говорят, что в отношении Григория Заславского МВД проводит проверку на причастность "к превышению должностных полномочий и необоснованному начислению заработной платы". Но дело пока не возбуждено. https://www.vedomosti.ru/media/articles/2026/08/04/1218856-rektora-gitisa?from=newsline

🤯6😢3👎1😁1

3 Aug 2026, 19:51 UTC797 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А прям отличный миллиардник! Как минимум. С оговоркой на летний (низкий) сезон для кинопроката. Отдельно хочется отметить каст. Режиссер Антон Маслов со сцены говорил, что обстановка на площадке была семейной. И это чувствуется-химия между актерами случилась, и она получилась по-настоящему доброй. Хрон - 1 час 50 минут, но время пролетело незаметно.

👎1711🤬2

3 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC742 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Скакала из Марьиной Рощи в "Октябрь". Как юная лань, а я не юная лань! Чтобы успеть. Успела!

🔥12👎10😁3🤬1🤯1

31 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC956 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @badguydiePhoto

Все – про Нолана, и мы про Нолана. Точнее, про индустриальный контекст новой «Одиссеи» и прошлых версий. И оказалось, что от хорошей жизни Гомера не экранизируют. Эпик Дино Де Лаурентиса 1954 года произвел революцию в финансировании независимого кино, сериал Андрея Кончаловского 1997-го стал памятником традиционному ТВ, сдающему позиции под натиском кабельных каналов и видео. Но и Нолану, конечно, есть, кого и что

👍42

30 Jul 2026, 13:20 UTC≈1,320 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Сан Саныч Жаров говорит, что искать замену Вадиму Верещагину "на внешнем рынке" (имеется в виду за пределами холдинга, как я понимаю) ГПМ не будет.

🤔3👍1👏1😁1

30 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTC≈1,560 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот это хантинг... Даже не года, а, пожалуй, десятилетия! Гендиректор «Централ партнершип» (входит в «Газпром-медиа») Вадим Верещагин переходит на работу в «Национальную медиа группу». С 1 сентября он будет руководить кинокластером, который создает НМГ. Подробности - в статье. https://www.vedomosti.ru/media/articles/2026/07/30/1217608-vereschagin-perehodit

👏5🔥1🤔1

30 Jul 2026, 07:32 UTC≈1,630 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Рынок музыкального стриминга в России в 2025 г. вырос на 35,2% в сравнении с 2024 г. и составил 53,97 млрд руб., следует из данных исследования компании J’son & Partners Consulting. Подавляющую часть доходов, а именно 99%, участникам рынка принесла подписка. Лидером по доходам среди музыкальных стримингов в России снова стала «Яндекс музыка»: доля этого сервиса составила 54,9%. На второй позиции – «VK музыка» (20%).

2

29 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC924 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Оперативно разобрались в том, что грозит Дурову после обвинений в терроризме. А также какие риски это создает для работы Telegram в России и пользователей этого мессенджера. https://www.vedomosti.ru/media/articles/2026/07/29/1217280-chto-grozit-durovu

2

28 Jul 2026, 10:43 UTC871 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Друзья, а проголосуйте, плиз, за Диму Игнатьева, как за лучшего журналиста, пищущего о книжном рынке России. Я искренне считаю, что Дима в полной мере заслуживает этого звания: он много и круто пишет про книжный бизнес. И заодно - за лучший книжный, лучшее издательство и т.д. Жамкать по ссылке https://www.bookind.ru/revizor/2026/revizor-2026-voting.php

9👎2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @Vaaasha_Masha. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 136,753 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ПроСМИсь
@prosmis · 100,892
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 August 2026
Okko Кино
@okkomovies · 119,598
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 August 2026
Продюсер Kartoz
@kartozz · 124,296
Telegram ranks this channel #94 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Маша и Медиа” (@Vaaasha_Masha), 3,441 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Vaaasha_Masha.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.