Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

JR5's CooksπŸ§‘β€πŸ³πŸ’Έ

@JR5sCooks

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry

17,491subscribers

+243 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002041138683
TypeChannel
Username@JR5sCooks
DescriptionLooking for and posting degen Solana plays! X: https://x.com/JR5_Crypto My Dm's are open : @JR5_eth Education only, Not Financial advice. DYOR.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/JR5sCooks

Growth

17,20317,49117,3477 August 2026 β€” 17,248 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 17,203 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 17,272 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 17,297 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 17,360 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 17,443 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 17,491 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net +243. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,160–17,534 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 20:2317,491+48
11 Aug 2026, 23:2617,443+83
11 Aug 2026, 01:2517,360+63
10 Aug 2026, 00:3017,297+25
8 Aug 2026, 22:2717,272+69
8 Aug 2026, 00:5217,203-45
7 Aug 2026, 12:1517,248first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
18.4%
avg views Γ· 17,491 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,220
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.43%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held19 (19 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total61,140
Reactions total1,486
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
514
Videos
9
Links
162

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 β€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,486 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❀34223.0%
πŸ‘30220.3%
πŸ”₯28919.4%
😁28219.0%
πŸŽ‰26617.9%
πŸ‘€30.202%
πŸ’―10.067%
😱10.067%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 1,486reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:28 UTCβ‰ˆ1,360 views91 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Crazy to think that shit cooked so many people and is now bouncing a little. If this reaches all time high again, everyone is sooooo fkn back.

❀27πŸ‘25😁20πŸ”₯11πŸŽ‰8

6 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTCβ‰ˆ1,860 views89 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @ExysLabPhoto

$CASHCAT has been listed on Robinhood

❀25😁19πŸŽ‰18πŸ”₯14πŸ‘13

6 Aug 2026, 12:45 UTCβ‰ˆ1,860 views87 reactionsread 13 August 2026

$CASHCAT I guess this is what happens when you are the main runner and you get listed on Robinhood.

❀19πŸ‘19πŸ”₯17😁17πŸŽ‰15

4 Aug 2026, 17:02 UTCβ‰ˆ2,530 views40 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Looks like things are falling off a cliff right now with $CATE Probably a combination of what happened yesterday and overall market looking a little 5050. If you caught it yesterday, from the bottom it was a 6x. So it was a great knife to catch topping out at around 60-61m MC

πŸ‘12πŸ”₯12❀9πŸŽ‰5πŸ‘€2

3 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTCβ‰ˆ2,610 views91 reactionsread 13 August 2026

If you caught the falling knife fast, you are up good. 4+ x from the bottom. Congrats.

πŸ”₯24πŸŽ‰18πŸ‘18❀17😁14

3 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTCβ‰ˆ2,630 views26 reactionsread 13 August 2026

These times are free bids. Mass panic happened when one of the top holders dumped his bag. The bounce was always going to happen. Free % gains.

πŸŽ‰8😁7❀6πŸ”₯4😱1

3 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTCβ‰ˆ2,160 views90 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

$CATE One of the most disgusting things i've seen in a while. FUCKING CRAZY.

πŸ”₯26❀19😁16πŸŽ‰15πŸ‘14

30 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTCβ‰ˆ3,280 views96 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

$HOODRAT Simply just Matt Furie aura. Higher.

❀29πŸŽ‰18😁18πŸ‘17πŸ”₯14

30 Jul 2026, 00:19 UTCβ‰ˆ3,640 views87 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Just seeing this now, if this is true. JUST SEND IT ALREADY.

❀27πŸ”₯17πŸŽ‰16😁15πŸ‘12

30 Jul 2026, 00:18 UTCβ‰ˆ3,490 views85 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @LevisAlphaPhoto

Matt furie just followed the $HOODRAT page Send it back turbo wallahi

πŸ‘20😁20πŸ”₯17πŸŽ‰15❀13

28 Jul 2026, 21:35 UTCβ‰ˆ3,440 views58 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @ExysLabPhoto

Trust me just buy $SLVR and thank me later. I never have this type of conviction and in anything. Watch. 0x791229e3ebd6cfdc3d8157f48722684173c29ad9

πŸ‘18πŸŽ‰17❀14πŸ”₯8πŸ’―1

28 Jul 2026, 02:00 UTCβ‰ˆ3,470 views85 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://x.com/S_L_V_R_FUN/status/2081921729006551499?s=20

πŸŽ‰20😁20πŸ”₯17❀16πŸ‘12

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @JR5sCooks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œJR5's CooksπŸ§‘β€πŸ³πŸ’Έβ€ (@JR5sCooks), 17,491 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JR5sCooks.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.