Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

مسترکریپتو

@mrcrypto0o

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,991subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001479169426
TypeChannel
Username@mrcrypto0o
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/mrcrypto0o

Growth

2,9892,9942,991.57 August 2026 — 2,989 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,989 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,994 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,991 subscribers2,9917 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,988–2,995 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:362,991-3
10 Aug 2026, 16:322,994+5
7 Aug 2026, 15:312,989no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:182,989first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 26 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.9%
avg views ÷ 2,991 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (26 May 20267 August 2026)
Views total3,313
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:13 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

485 reactions across 21 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15431.8%
😁13728.2%
🔥7315.1%
👏479.69%
👍418.45%
😱204.12%
👎61.24%
🙏51.03%
🤩20.412%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 485reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 21 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mrcrypto0o. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 19:24 UTC≈1,560 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚠️ آبان تتر هم تحریم شد ، مراقب دارایی هاتون باشید و سعی کنید از صرافی های ایرانی با جایی تعامل نداشته باشید.و دنبال راه های دیگه برای تبدیل ریالی باشید.

👏114

3 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC823 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @C_CoopPhoto

💚 اگر به کسی برنمیخوره که برید رای‌گیری جدید Reya رو شرکت کنید. (لینک) 🧡 کل قضیه‌ای هم که الان متاسفانه به اشتباه داره قضاوت میشه اینه که Reya به نسبت زمانی که ما شروع کردیم خیلی خلوت شده و پوینت جمع کردن با رقم‌های کم خیلی راحت شده درحدی که با مدیریت‌سرمایه و ریسک خیلی از افراد همخونی داره و فرصت خوبی محسوب میشه، همین! هیچ قضیه دیگه‌ای مبنی بر اینکه به سفیرها بابت ریوارد و رفرال چیزی گفتن وجود نداره و متاسفانه بعض

13👍4👎2

1 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC930 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @Gift3DAO

#67 ⚡️ یه ربات تلگرامی ساخته شده توسط تیم های داگز و نات کوین ✨ https://telegram.me ⚡️ یه سری کوئست داره با کلیک اکی میشن ، واسه من فعلا درست لود نمیشه شاید نتم ضعیفه نکته ی جدیدی بود اضافه میکنم

8👍2👎2🔥2

2 Jul 2026, 16:00 UTC≈2,000 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡️ یکی از خفن ترین دکس های کریپتویی‌که داره میاد اسمش Arcus هست. ⚡️تیم Dydx و پلتفرم رابین هود که هردو جزو غول های صنعت مالی و ترید تو کریپتو و دنیا هستن همکاری کردن و یک دکس به اسم Arcus دارن میسازن ، که میتونید از لینک زیر وایت لیست بشید و تو صف بمونید. ⚡️ حتما ولت اصلی وصل کنید اگه تو هایپر ، dydx یا لایتر ترید زدید تو صف و دسترسی سریعتری قرار میگیرید. https://waitlist.arcus.xyz/s/MRCRYPTO ⚡️ ازاین لینک میتونی

22👏4

20 Jun 2026, 20:21 UTC≈2,690 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

دوستان یک خبر خوب : 💠 به لطف شما و تلاش های ما Predixi تو هفته گذاشته جزو 50 تا مینی اپ برتر base قرارگرفت.و رنک 31 رو گرفت. 💠 همچنان با تیم خود base درارتباطم و اونا تشویق میکنن و بزودی خبرهای خوش بیشتری هم بهتون میدم.ممنون ازکسایی که اعتماد داشتند.چندتا آپدیت مهم هم داریم. 💠 یک : سایت منتقل شد به دامنه اصلی : https://predixi.xyz/ البته ازطریق دامنه قبلی هم وارد شید شمارو ارجاع میده به همین لینک و مشکلی نیست.تو

17🔥6👎1

15 Jun 2026, 14:20 UTC≈1,940 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

این کیه تو لیدربورد پنجمه🤣 اسمشو گذاشته Anti.mrcrypto داداش بااین اسمت کیت ورزشی کنسله ها😂

😁43🔥3

14 Jun 2026, 21:38 UTC≈2,020 views32 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

ولی تو خاورمیانه از توافق بیشتر از جنگ باید بترسیم! حتما نگران آینده و وضعیت اقتصادی باشید و ریسک های عجیب نکنید. پ.ن : بیشترین رشد دلار بعد از توافق برجام بود.

👏20👍65👎1

14 Jun 2026, 21:36 UTC≈2,000 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍10😁6

11 Jun 2026, 18:42 UTC≈2,300 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔵 اگه بیس اپ ندارید میتونید با این‌ لینک بسازید : https://base.app/invite/mrcryptoo1/3BHHPLJ9

🔥14😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @mrcrypto0o. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Jun 2026, 17:18 UTCAnonymous Poll385 voters

اگه یک صرافی غیرمتمرکز ایرانی باشه با حالت P2P(معاملات کاربر به کاربر) آیا تمایلی دارید ازش استفاده کنید؟

  1. آره تمایل دارم.69%
  2. نه تمایلی ندارم صرافیای متمرکز داخلی رو ترجیح میدم.31%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 621,001 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“مسترکریپتو” (@mrcrypto0o), 2,991 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrcrypto0o.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.