12 measurements spanning 12 days, net +138. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,511–42,699 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Aug 2026, 19:33
42,671
+5
18 Aug 2026, 19:47
42,666
-9
17 Aug 2026, 18:55
42,675
-2
16 Aug 2026, 15:14
42,677
+26
14 Aug 2026, 20:36
42,651
+7
13 Aug 2026, 12:06
42,644
+5
12 Aug 2026, 09:22
42,639
+17
11 Aug 2026, 10:12
42,622
+3
10 Aug 2026, 06:44
42,619
+21
9 Aug 2026, 05:03
42,598
+55
8 Aug 2026, 06:52
42,543
+10
7 Aug 2026, 11:46
42,533
first reading
Engagement
353 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.65%
avg views ÷ 42,671 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,840
353 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.39%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
353
of 353 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 349 of 353 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held
353 (6 August 2026 – 19 August 2026)
Views total
1,002,361
Reactions total
33,734
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
20 Aug 2026, 00:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈59,900
Videos
≈667
Links
≈4,050
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 00s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
33,734 reactions across 347 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
13,101
38.8%
🔥
7,524
22.3%
👍
3,756
11.1%
👎
2,277
6.75%
😁
2,036
6.04%
💔
1,414
4.19%
💯
814
2.41%
❤🔥
609
1.81%
🤩
352
1.04%
😡
258
0.765%
😈
184
0.545%
☃
151
0.448%
🤨
133
0.394%
💘
117
0.347%
😐
115
0.341%
✍
113
0.335%
😭
108
0.32%
🌚
101
0.299%
🆒
99
0.293%
🗿
98
0.291%
10 further kinds
374
1.11%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 349 of the 353 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33,734reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 353 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😤میخوای مسابقات فوتبال پیش بینی کنی؟!
🥇پس نیاز داری به یه سایت بین المللی و معتبر🥇
⛔دربی بت همون انتخاب 100%
💎ویژگی های سایت جهانی Derby Bet:
⬅️امکان شارژ امن با کارت بانکی
⬅️واریز اول دوبل شارژ می شوید(بونوس۱۰۰٪)
⬅️پر اپشن ترین سایت فعال در ایران
⬅️تسویه حساب کمتر از 5 دقیقه
⬅️برگشت بخشی از باخت به صورت هفتگی
⭐دارای لایسنس و مجوز anjuan
🚨کد هدیه ثبت نام:GG007
⚠️برای دانلود اپلکیشن کلیک کنید👉
🔔کانال دربی بت :👇🅰…
🚨🦁 انزو فرناندز، پدرو نتو و مالو گوستو در حال تمرین با گروه اصلی تحت نظر آلونسو هستند.
توسین آدارابیویو و اکسل دیساسی از جمله بازیکنانی هستند که در گروه دوم تمرین میکنند. این گروه همچنین برای افزایش آمادگی بدنی بازیکنانی مانند دنی ولبک و جوردن هندرسون، و همچنین بازیکنانی که ممکن است به صورت قرضی به تیمهای دیگر منتقل شوند، از جمله میخایلو مودریک، مورد استفاده قرار میگیرد.
ژائو پدرو، امانوئل امگا و دنی ولبک، سه مه…
🚨🦁 لیام دلاپ و نیکلاس جکسون بخشی از گروهی از بازیکنان چلسی هستند که به طور جداگانه از تیم اصلی تحت هدایت ژابی آلونسو تمرین میکنند، این در حالی است که آمادگیها برای شروع فصل به اوج خود رسیده است. توسین نیز بخشی از این گروه است.
باشگاه چلسی به این گروه دوم – که گاهی اوقات شامل 12 بازیکن میشود – اجازه میدهد تا همزمان با گروه اصلی ژابی آلونسو تمرین کنند، در زمینهای تمرینی یکسان حضور داشته باشند و همچنان از امکانات …
🎙🦁 ولنتین بارکو:
من قبل از پیوستن به چلسی، با انزو فرناندز و آندری سانتوس صحبت کردم. هر دو گفتند که چلسی یک باشگاه «بسیار عالی» است.»
🏴 @Chelsea_Tm
🎙 ولنتین بارکو:
خیلی خوشحالم که اینجا هستم و برای این باشگاه بازی میکنم. چلسی یکی از بهترین باشگاههای دنیاست. وقتی چلسی با شما تماس میگیره، باید بگید بله. پیوستن به چلسی قدم بزرگی برای برگشتن به لیگ برتر بود. هفته اول واقعاً فوقالعاده بود. کیفیت، شدت تمرینات و خود تمرینها در بالاترین سطح بودن. بازی کردن برای چلسی یه رؤیاست.
من از بازی در پست هافبک احساس راحتی میکنم. عاشق این پستم، چون خیلی زیاد با توپ درگیر می…
بر اساس گزارشها، به نظر میرسد که چلسی احتمالاً از ژائو پدرو، دنی ولبک و امانوئل امگا به عنوان سه مهاجم اصلی خود در طول فصل استفاده خواهد کرد. آیا از این انتخابها راضی هستید؟
🏴 @Chelsea_Tm
🦁 در چنین روزی در سال 2012، ادن هازارد اولین بازی خود در لیگ برتر را برای چلسی انجام داد
🦁 352 بازی
⚽️ 110 گل
⚽️ 92 پاس گل
🏆 لیگ جزیره [x2]
🏆 لیگ اروپا [x2]
🏆 جام حذفی [x1]
🏆 جام اتحادیه [x1]
🎖 بازیکن سال لیگ جزیره [x1]
🎖 بازیکن سال باشگاه چلسی [x4]
🏴 @Chelsea_Tm
❤105❤🔥16😭4👍2👎1🤷♂1
Showing the 12 most recent of 353 posts we hold for @Chelsea_TM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
فابریتزیو رومانو | Fabrizio Romano @FabirizioRomano · 77,695 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
Chelsea FC 🔵 @CFC_ChelseaFC · 137,066 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هواداران چلسی | Chelsea” (@Chelsea_TM), 42,671 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Chelsea_TM.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.