Channel
@crypto_pico
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Posts Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
39,068subscribers
+16 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 31,623β100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001904104959 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crypto_pico |
| Description | πΊπΈ Daily crypto news, Bitcoin & Ethereum analysis, US crypto market updates, trading signals, DeFi trends, blockchain insights, whale activity, and altcoins. Focused on the πΊπΈ US crypto ecosystem and global financial movements. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 January 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crypto_pico |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:44 | 39,068 | +16 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 39,052 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (18 August 2026 β 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 290,100 |
| Reactions total | β |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 23 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
#API3/USDT BUY SETUP API3 has broken out of a falling wedge pattern on strong volume and is now retesting the breakout zone. If it successfully holds above this level, bullish momentum will likely be confirmedβopening the door for a strong upward move in the sessions ahead. π ππππ ππ β’
β Follow @cryp ππππ ππ β’
POV: You decided to shortβright at the very bottom β Follow @cryp ππππ ππ β’
#AXS/USDT Reached 1.1288 β up 34% so far πβοΈ ππππ ππ β’
#S&P_500_ANALYSIS The S&P 500 has broken below the rising wedge pattern and is now trading above the breakout level of the ascending triangle. A successful retest and sustained hold at that level could confirm bullish momentum. Watch price action closely for confirmation. Given its strong correlation with crypto markets, the S&P 500βs next move will likely play a crucial role in shaping broader risk sentiment. ππβ¦
Jim Cramer: August 3rd: "Iβm selling my Bitcoin." August 21st: *Bitcoin surges to $78,000* Guess heβs the anti-forecast for a reason. β Follow @cryp ππππ ππ β’
#ETH/USDT ANALYSIS ETH has broken out of a descending triangle pattern on strong volume, sparking a solid upward move. Price is now retesting the breakout zone, where the previous supply area has flipped into a key support level. A successful retest opens the door for further gains, while a rejection could pave the way for a drop. ππππ ππ β’
Just Pump It Up. β Follow @cryp ππππ ππ β’
Most people jump into crypto for one reason: the buzz. Theyβre chasing the next meme coin pump, hoping to cash out fast. Then a single green candle appearsβand suddenly, everyone thinks the top is here. Have the courage to buy at the top. Because thatβs exactly why you got in. Thatβs what you signed up for from the start. β Follow @cryp ππππ ππ β’
#BTC/USDT ANALYSIS Bitcoin is currently trading beneath the horizontal supply zone, which is now serving as a major resistance level. A rejection at this area could push prices lower, fueling additional downward momentum. Conversely, a strong breakout above this zone would signal bullish confirmation and may open the door for further upside. Keep a close eye on this key level. ππππ ππ β’
#USDT_DOMINANCE_ANALYSIS USDT Dominance has dropped sharply from a symmetrical triangle breakout, supported by strong volumeβindicating growing bearish momentum. The Ichimoku cloud continues to serve as a resistance level, while price remains just above the key horizontal demand zone. If buyers maintain control above this support, a bounce could follow. However, a decisive break below would likely open the door toβ¦
Bloomberg reports that Anthropic is set to file its IPO documents by the end of August, aiming for a valuation on par withβor even exceedingβSpaceXβs. Meanwhile, Polymarket is pricing in an 82% probability of the IPO happening by Octoberβs end. β Follow @cryp ππππ ππ β’
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @crypto_pico. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππππ ππ β’β (@crypto_pico), 39,068 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crypto_pico.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.