در یک نگاه کلی، مقاله «السبك المعجمي وأثره في صناعة النص: الخطبة الفدكية اختياراً» پژوهشی ارزشمند در حوزه زبانشناسی متن است که با تکیه بر معیار «سبک» از نظریه معیارهای هفتگانه متن، دو سازوکار «تکرار» و «تضام» را در خطبه فدکیه میکاود. نویسنده بهخوبی نشان میدهد که بیبی زهرا سلام الله علیها با گزینش آگاهانه واژگان، تکرار هدفمند اصوات و کلمات، و ایجاد روابط معجمی تقابل و تلازم، متنی پدید آوردهاند که هم از نظر ساخت…

Channel
تَصحیحُ الاِعتِقاد
@Arshvetashih
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,384subscribers
-115 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001344205937 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Arshvetashih |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Arshvetashih |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 07:41 | 6,384 | -1 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:49 | 6,385 | -34 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:09 | 6,419 | -49 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:31 | 6,468 | -16 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 03:57 | 6,484 | -1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 01:20 | 6,485 | +3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:57 | 6,482 | +6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 06:00 | 6,476 | +2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:55 | 6,474 | -6 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 23:01 | 6,480 | -7 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 10:57 | 6,487 | -13 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 6,500 | -3 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 6,503 | +1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 13:19 | 6,502 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 6,503 | -2 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:47 | 6,505 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:47 | 6,508 | +5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 6,503 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 6,510 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 6,513 | first reading |
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.75%
- avg views ÷ 6,384 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 559
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (24 June 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,794 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 11:36 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 5 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
• «(السبك المعجمي / Lexical Cohesion): مفهومشناسی، سازوکارها و کارکرد انسجامبخش آن در خطبه فدکیه» به یاری خداوند متعال در خصوص مقاله حاضر، گزارش مختصری ارائه خواهم کرد. »Tashiholetiqad
⚜تحول موضع "ابنتیمیه" در قبال "ابن عربی" • رابطه ابنتیمیه با میراث ابنعربی غالبا به روایتی تکخطی از محکومیت قاطع فروکاسته میشود اما منابع اصلی تصویری دقیقتر و مرحلهایتر را حفظ کردهاند. ابنتیمیه، خود تصریح میکند که در آغاز نسبت به ابنعربی نگاه مثبتی داشته و از برخی آثار او - بهویژه الفتوحات المکیه، الکنه فیما لا بد منه للمرید، الأمر المحکم المربوط، الدرة الفاخرة و مواقع النجوم - به سبب توصیههای عملی و ا…
⚜تصوف از نگاه ابنتیمیه ردّ یا قبول؟ ◄ این تحقیق، اثری ارزشمند و روشنگر در تبیین نسبت اندیشههای ابن تیمیه با جریان تصوف است. نویسنده در این اثر با رویکردی تحلیلی و علمی نشان میدهد که ابن تیمیه تصوف را یک کلیت واحد و یکپارچه نمینگرد بلکه با تفکیکی دقیق، میان «تصوف مقبول و شریعتمدار» و «تصوف بدعتآمیز فلسفی» مرز میکشد • ابن تیمیه در حالی که با برخی جریانها و شخصیتهای صوفی (همچون ابن عربی و آموزههای وحدت وجود…
فارغ از از محسنات تحقیقات جناب دکتر به وفور، مطالب تکراری یا ضعیف یافتم در باب برخی از موضوعات که ایشان در خصوص آنها اظهارنظر کردهاند، پژوهشهای بسیار مستندتر و از حیث روششناختی استوارتری در ادبیات علمی مربوطه در دسترس است که شایسته و بایسته است بدانها مراجعه شود. چرا پستهای تلگرامی در این سطح، تبدیل به کتاب میشوند؟ »Tashiholetiqad
❖ منسوب به مولای ما حضرت امیرالمؤمنین فخر الموحدین علی علیه السلام: • الدهرُ يومانِ: يومٌ لكَ و يومٌ علَيكَ، فإذا كانَ لَكَ فلا تَبطَرْ، و إذا كانَ علَيكَ فاصبِر • روزگار، دو روز است ، روزى به كام تو و روزى به زيان تو. هرگاه به كام تو گشت، سرمست مشو و چون به زيان تو شد، شكيبا باش نهج البلاغة حکمت ۳۹۶ » Tashiholetiqad
⚜غلو اهل مکر در حق ابوبکر ❼ • یکی از روایات ساختگی در شأن ابوبکر (خذل الله من تبعه فی الدنیا و الآخرة) حکایتی است غریب و معجب که «شاه ولی الله دهلوی» در «ازالة الخفاء» آن را نقل کرده است: ! قال رسول الله: «يا أبا بكر، أعطاك الله الرضوان الأكبر». فقال بعض القوم: و ما الرضوان الأكبر؟...قال: «يتجلّى الله لعباده في الآخرة عامة، ويتجلّى لأبي بكر خاصة» ° خداوند در آخرت بر بندگانش به صورت عام جلوه میکند لکن برای ابوبکر…
سلام علی آل طه و یس سلام علی آل خیر النبیین سلام علی روضة حل فیها امام یباهی به الملک والدین • الأنیس الرفیق
کسی که ضامن آهو شود وقت گرفتاری یقینا زائرش بی بهره از این در نمیگردد آمدم ای شاه پناهم بده
❂ مرحوم مجتهد کرکی و معبودیت خالق • (نوه محقق کرکی) در تبیین ادله نفی شرکت (در بحث توحید) چنین مینویسد: ◄ «...فلان النقل و العقل دلّا علی قبح عبادة غیره...و اما سجود الملائکة لآدم و آل یعقوب لیوسف...انما هو علی سبیل التعظیم لا علی سبیل العبادة...فانّ العبادة الذلة...و فی الاصطلاح ضرب من الشکر...لانها الخضوع باعلی مراتب الخضوع...و لایستحق الا باصول النعم التی هی خلق الحیاة و القدرة و الشهوة و لا یقدر علیه غیر الله …
⚜نقد باورهای فلاسفه توسط امامی از ائمة زیدیة • (یحیی بن حمزة بن علی العلوی) از برجسته ترین امامان فرقه زیدیه به شمار میرود که جامع بین علم و سیاست بود. او از نسل سیزدهم امام رضا علیه السلام است و به خاندان "رسّی" (که معمولا امامت زیدیه در این خاندان است) تعلق ندارد. • یحیی بن حمزه را باید از برجستهترین متکلمان نقاد جهان اسلام دانست که با ذهنی تحلیلگر و رویکردی استدلالی، بسیاری از مبانی فلسفی رایج را به محک نقد ن…
⚜ کدامین صحابه؟ عادلان یا ظالمان؟ ❽ ° نام جنایتکار: عمرو بن حریث المخزومی ° جایگاه: صحابی ° جرم: مقابله با جناب مسلم بن عقیل فرستاده امام حسین سلام الله علیه و مشارکت در شهادت ایشان «قال: صلیت خلف النبی ص» 📖صحیح مسلم ص۲۶۴ ح۱۰۶۶ «حدث ابنه عن ابیه: رایت النبی ص علی المنبر» 📖سنن ابی داود ج۶ ص۱۷۷ «عمرو بن حریث المخزومی صحابی صغیر» 📖عمدة القاری ج۱۸ ص۳۶ 📖تحفة الاحوذی ج۶ ص۱۹۶ ----------- «فبعث عبید الله، عمرو بن حری…
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Arshvetashih. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@alamehasanzade · 1,8961 post🌎 عاشورائیان 🌍
@Ashoraeiann · 401 postفاروق اعظم امیرالمومنین ع است
@farooqir · 3391 post﴿اِعڕِفِ الحَقَّ﴾
@irifAlHaqq · 2711 postلًُیًُنًُکًُدًُوًُنًُیًُ رًُاًُهًُیًُاًُنًُ نًُوًُرً
@linkdooni_rahiyane_noor · 511 postمدرسه کلام
@madraseh_kalam · 2,3711 post🌼بیاسمت خدا🌼
@samtkhodam · 201 postذِکری
@zecra · 1,2071 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tasviredel · 20,700
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 September 2026
@negahiinou · 13,128
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 September 2026
@Nebras_arabic · 21,719
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 September 2026
@elteja · 30,536
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تَصحیحُ الاِعتِقاد” (@Arshvetashih), 6,384 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Arshvetashih.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.