Channel
@madraseh_kalam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,378subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001353038708 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @madraseh_kalam |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/madraseh_kalam |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:41 | 2,378 | -1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 2,379 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:39 | 2,378 | +2 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 15:21 | 2,376 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:03 | 2,375 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 2,378 | -2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:12 | 2,380 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 2,381 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 08:22 | 2,384 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 2,383 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 2,385 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 2,385 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 31 January 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
302 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 138 | 45.7% | |
| ❤ | 115 | 38.1% | |
| 👎 | 49 | 16.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 302 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 31 January 2024 to 16 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
• (فصل) فأما قوله تعالى وَ لا تَعْجَلْ بِالْقُرْآنِ مِنْ قَبْلِ أَنْ يُقْضى إِلَيْكَ وَحْيُهُ ففيه وجهان غير ما ذكره أبو جعفر و عول فيه على حديث شاذ. أحدهما أن الله تعالى نهاه عن التسرع إلى تأويل القرآن قبل الوحي إليه به و إن كان في الإمكان من جهة اللغة ما قالوه على مذهب أهل اللسان. و الوجه الآخر أن جبرئيل ع كان يوحي إليه بالقرآن فيتلوه معهحرفا بحرف فأمره الله تعالى أن لا يفعل ذلك و يصغى إلى ما يأتيه به جبرئيل أ…
❤10👍2
طه | ۱۱۴ • پس والا مرتبه است خداى يكتا، فرمانرواى برحق. ای پیامبر در نزول آیات کتاب و یا خواندن قرآن پيش از آنكه وحى آن بر تو پايان يابد شتاب نكن (همراه با جبرئیل قرائت نکن)، و بگو: «پروردگارا! بر دانش من بيفزاى» ←کلام شیخ مفید ره→
❤11
⚜ پاسخ به یک شبهه پیرامون علم معصومین علیهم السلام ✪ مشاهده میشود که برخی از آقایان با استناد به پارهای از اخبار چنین ادعاء میکنند: « چگونه ممکن است که خداوند متعال طاعت شخصی را بر عباد مفروض گرداند با این حال علم آسمان و زمین را از وی دریغ نماید؟ » • محتوای این دسته از روایات را به مثابه یک قاعده عامه، مرجعی حاکم برای توضیح علم معصوم معرفی میکنند: « ولایة المعصوم تقتضی علمه علی کل شیء » ↓ از این حیث که م…
👎36👍22❤7
⚜ مقاله "واکاوی تمایزات نظریه ملاصدرا پیرامون رابطه خالق و مخلوق با میراث روائی شیعه" • با تکیه بر مباحث جناب استاد حسن میلانی 🌐اینستاگرام مدرسه کلام 🌐تلگرام مدرسه کلام
❤10👍5👎3
⚜ مقاله "واکاوی تمایزات نظریه ملاصدرا پیرامون رابطه خالق و مخلوق با میراث روائی شیعه" 🌐اینستاگرام مدرسه کلام 🌐تلگرام مدرسه کلام
👍11❤1
#divine_leader ◄ مَنْ كُنْتُ مَوْلَاهُ فَهَذَا عَلِيٌّ مَوْلَاهُ ◂ هرکس که من بر او ولایت دارم، علی نیز بر او ولایت دارد • بخشی از خطبه حضرت رسول الله الاعظم صلی الله علیه و آله در غدیر خم | سند جاودان و فراموش نشدنی ولایت الهی امام علی علیه السلام روحی له الفداء ⇇مدرسه کلام
❤23👍12👎3
✪ حتی اگر من آتئیست باشم این دلیل نظر من را تغییر میدهد ... #بطلان_بینهایت #حدوث_عالم ⇇ تصحیح الاعتقاد
👍48👎4❤2
توحیدِ امامیه ۱. برهان استحاله خلق لا من شیء برای مخلوقات ٢. براهینِ اثبات وجود خدا_"برهانِ اول" ۳. براهینِ اثبات وجود خدا_"برهانِ دوم" ۴. برهانِ اثباتِ وحدانیتِ خداوند (تقریرِ اول) ۵. برهانِ اثباتِ وحدانیتِ خداوند (تقریرِ دوم) ۶. برهانِ اثباتِ قادرِ مختار بودن خداوند ۷. برهانِ اثباتِ عالم بودن خداوند ۸. صفاتِ ذاتِ خداوندِ متعال ۹. برهانِ عدمِ محدودیتِ علم و قدرتِ خداوند ۱۰. علم خداوند، حصولی یا حضوری؟! ۱۱. علم خداو…
❤15👍6
👇👇توضیحات تکمیلی جلسه اول نقد و بررسی تقریرهای وحدت وجود سید محسن هندی
👍8❤4👎1
«درنگی در تقریرهای مختلف وحدت وجود» 🎙استاد سید محسن هندی 🔺 فهرست برخی عناوین مطروحه در نشست: ▪️برخی از مهمترین تقریرهای وحدت وجود -وحدت مفهوم -وحدت وجود کامل -وحدت اسم وجود -وحدت وجود، کثرت موجود -وحدت وجود عینی کثرت وجود علمی -وحدت وجود علمی و کثرت وجود عینی -وحدت وجود مستقل و کثرت روابط یا وجودهای رابط -وحدت شهود -وحدت حقیقت وجود و کثرت رقیقت -وحدت حقیقت وجود و کثرت مجازی ماسوی -وحدت حقیقی وجود و کثرت حقیقی مخلوق…
❤12👍5👎2
اثبات الرجعة منسوب به فضل بن شاذان ! 1. مقاله نقش میرلوحی سبزواری در پیدایش مختصر اثبات الرجعة منسوب به فضل بن شاذان (✍️علی عادلزاده) 2. فایلِ ارائه صوتیِ بحث: میرلوحی سبزواری و جعل اثبات الرجعة منسوب به فضل بن شاذان منبع: کانالِ معرفة الرجال و الآثار @madraseh_kalam
👍15
⚜ معمای معجزات @madraseh_kalam
❤20👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @madraseh_kalam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“مدرسه کلام” (@madraseh_kalam), 2,378 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/madraseh_kalam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.