تطبيق لمساعدة طلبة السادس الاعدادي يتضمن وزاريات، ملاحظات، يوتيوب، ذكاء الاصطناعي، وغيرها الكثير
تحميل:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.dahraja.app
iOS:
https://t.me/Dahrja/3856
للتواصل : @Dahrja_bot
Created
7 April 2023 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net +1,358. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,319–19,085 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 18:07
18,881
+226
13 Aug 2026, 05:16
18,655
+184
12 Aug 2026, 08:12
18,471
+288
11 Aug 2026, 04:35
18,183
+290
10 Aug 2026, 03:02
17,893
+328
9 Aug 2026, 02:21
17,565
+42
8 Aug 2026, 22:15
17,523
no change
8 Aug 2026, 22:02
17,523
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 7 April 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
209.7%
avg views ÷ 18,881 subscribers
Avg views / post
39,600
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held
11 (7 April 2023 – 26 July 2026)
Views total
79,200
Reactions total
1,499
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 21:26 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
7
Links
5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
4,483 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
2,721
60.7%
😍
853
19.0%
🔥
570
12.7%
🎉
339
7.56%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,483reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 7 April 2023 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
140
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 9 we hold a reading for · 67%
Most on one post
65
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Dahrja. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 April 2023 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
بعد الإقبال القوي على التطبيق خصوصاً مع إطلاق نسخة الـ iOS وتزايد الضغط على سيرفراتنا، اتخذنا القرار بإستئجار سيرفرات أضخم وأقوى لإستيعاب الأعداد المتزايدة والتفاعل المستمر على التطبيق.
وهسة.. تطبيق دحرجة صار أكبر وأضخم ويشتغل بكفاءة وإستقرار تام! شكراً لرسائلكم الي ماتوقفت، ونسأل الله أن يكلل تعبكم بأعلى مراتب التفوق.
وبعد إنجاز توسعة السيرفرات بنجاح لتتحمل هذا التفاعل، ترقبوا ميزات ضخمة واستثنائية بالأيام القليلة…
تزامناً مع ختام امتحانات دفعة 26 ، تم اطلاق التحديث الأخير لتطبيق دحرجة لهاي الدفعة.. إضافات ضخمة وميزات قوية كهدية بسيطة نختتم بيها هذا الموسم الدراسي.
أبرز الإضافات بالتحديث الجديد:
- استوديو الذكاء الاصطناعي: أدوات ذكية لتوليد الامتحانات، الخرائط الذهنية، بطاقات المراجعة، وتلخيص المواضيع، مع اضافة شخصية "فضفضة" الي راح يكون رفيق دراسي ومرشد تستيشره باي شي يخص دراستك وجداولك والخ.
- قسم الوزاريات: إضافة وزاريات …
بعد مرور أسبوعين، وصل عدد مستخدمي تطبيق دحرجة قرابة الـ 20 الف مستخدم، كل هذا واحنا بعدنا ما اطلقنا نسخة الـ iOS (اللي قريباً راح تكون مليئة بالمفاجئات)
بهالمناسبة، تم نشر هالفيديو اللي سولفنا بي عن قصة دحرجة وهدفها بدقيقتين
https://youtu.be/jXuCciYFPtA?si=1PDvSJhW9EQltheV
وفعلنا بوت الدعم : @Dahrja_bot
بعد أسبوع واحد من إطلاق "دحرجة" وبفضل الإقبال الكبير اللي تخطى 5,234 مستخدم نشط، صارت مسؤوليتنا أكبر حتى نوفرلكم بيئة دراسية وتقنية مستقرة توازي طموحكم.
اليوم، نقدم لكم تحديث جديد وشامل؛ نقلنا بيه التطبيق لسيرفرات جديدة كلياً حتى نضمن لكم سرعة واستقرار تام بأوقات المراجعة. وضفنا قسم "الجفصات الوزارية" اللي راح ينبهكم على الأخطاء الشائعة، مع تطوير نظام الامتحانات والتصحيح الفوري، وتحسين قسم دحرجة تيوب ليكون أسرع وأكثر…
بعد ست سنوات من التجربة والاحتكاك بالطلبة، وشغل مكثف لمدة سنة كاملة، گدرنا بفضل الله سبحانه وتعالى نحقق واحد من أكبر الإنجازات التقنية والتعليمية الحديثة
اليوم، وبكل فخر، نقدم لكم "دحرجة" برنامج عراقي يضم بيئة متكاملة تجمع المساعد الذكي المدرب عالمنهج، بنك الاسئلة الوزارية، ونظام أنكي والتكرار المتباعد للمراجعة، بالإضافة ليوتيوب مخصص لطالب السادس؛ وغيرها الكثير اللي كل أداة بيه مسخرة لخدمة تركيزك فقط.
مستعد تخوض ها…
6 سنين من "التدحرج" بدت بملاحظة وملف، وصارت أنكي واختبارات وفهرست وفيديوهات وغيرها الكثير ؛ كل خطوة چانت تبني لهذي اللحظة. اليوم "دحرجة" هي نتاج طبيعي لهذه المسيرة وتراكم الخبرات وتطل بـ طور جديد و جيل مختلف تماماً راح يغير الموازين بطريقة ما تخطر على بال أحد. المرحلة الجاية عنوانها تغيير واقع منظومة تعليمية بالكامل...
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Dahrja. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 196,731 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
قناة الهيتي للتميز🩺 @xd6xd6 · 170,325 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
الأستاذ حسين محمد @teacher_mh · 275,318 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
شبكة نيوتن التعليمية @Newton1998 · 396,836 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
سالم ال منصور @Salimalmansour98bio · 264,187 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
الاستاذ محمد قاسم @messo12 · 112,902 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
الاستاذ حيدر وليد @haiderwaleed · 470,889 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
سنتر السادس | Al-Santer @santer_sads · 361,642 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
سنتر الجامعة | Al-Santer @santer_jamea · 211,248 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دحرجة” (@Dahrja), 18,881 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Dahrja.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
