7 measurements spanning 6 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,816–11,865 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 12:43
11,822
-8
11 Aug 2026, 14:24
11,830
-2
10 Aug 2026, 13:33
11,832
-8
9 Aug 2026, 14:13
11,840
-11
8 Aug 2026, 16:07
11,851
-8
7 Aug 2026, 14:10
11,859
no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:15
11,859
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 11,822 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,500
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.333%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 11 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 July 2026
Posts held
11 (18 May 2026 – 15 July 2026)
Views total
1,500
Reactions total
5
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Aug 2026, 03:51 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
858
Videos
9
Links
166
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
146 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
128
87.7%
🔥
11
7.53%
👏
7
4.79%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 146reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
تنويه مهم لطلبة الدور الثاني 📢
بفضل الله ثم بفضل دعمكم، تجاوز عدد المسجلين في دورة "المراجعة المركزة" حاجز الـ 1000 طالب وطالبة خلال أيام قليلة.
ولضمان وصول جميع الكودات لكل طالب عبر شركات التوصيل بأفضل طريقة ، قررنا تأجيل موعد إطلاق الدورة لمدة 3 أيام فقط .
شكراً لصبركم وثقتكم بينا 🙏
للتسجيل : تواصلوا معنا عبر الانستجرام من خلال اليوزر : Bio_A2Z@
#الاحياء_من_الالف_الى_الياء #BIOA2Z #السادس_العلمي #الدور_الثاني …
📣 إعلان هام | المراجعة المركزة الأشهر في العراق
على بركة الله، ونزولًا عند رغبة طلبة العراق ، نُعلن لطلبتنا الأعزاء في الصف السادس العلمي عن انطلاق دورة المراجعة المركزة لمادة الأحياء ( الدور الثاني ) للعام الدراسي 2025 - 2026، والتي كانت ( بفضل الله ) سببًا في تحقيق 118 درجة في الدور الاول والسنوات السابقة.
📚 تتضمن الدورة:
– شرح مركز وسريع لأهم مفردات المنهج .
– تركيز خاص على أهم الأسئلة الوزارية المتوقعة .
⚠️ مل…
حصدت المراجعة المركزة على 118 درجة لهذه السنة
س 1 : أ ) القلم ( 1 درجة من 3 درجة ) - تم ذكره على انه واحد من أجزاء المدقة
س 1 : أ ) الجسيم الحركي ( 3 درجة من 3 درجة ) - تم ذكره نصًا
س 1 : أ ) المخاطين الغضروفي ( 3 درجة من 3 درجة ) - تم ذكره نصًا
س 1 : أ ) الليف الشبكي ( 3 درجة من 3 درجة ) - تم ذكره نصًا ونبهت عليه
س 1 : أ ) السيادة المشاركة ( المواكبة ) ( 3 درجة من 3 درجة ) - تم ذكره نصًا
س 1 : أ ) الأعراف ( 3 درجة…
رسم خطير عليه 8 درجات بالوزاري 😱
رسم “التركيب الكيميائي للغشاء البلازمي” جاي 28 مرة بالوزاري من 1988 لحد 2024.
يعني احتمال يجيك هاي السنة 90%!
بالصورة 4 و 5 شفت الفرق بين رسم الكتاب ورسم مركز الفحص 2017 - هذا اللي ينطيك الدرجة كاملة.
*الخلاصة:* الرسم نص الدرجة، والتأشيرات نص الدرجة الثانية.
#احياء_سادس_علمي #وزاري_2026 #المراجعة_المركزة #الغشاء_البلازمي
*نصيحة:* احفظ البوست حتى ترجعله قبل الامتحان
كارثة وزارية حقيقية!
نفس السؤال، ونفس الوزارة، وجوابين مختلفين.
سؤال الشبكة البلازمية الملساء والخشنة إذا إجاك بالوزاري شنو تكتب؟
الفرق بين جواب 2012 وجواب 2015 هو جملة وحدة : "وبشكل خاص الى أجسام كولجي"
والمصيبة الجملة أصلاً مو موجودة بالكتاب!
❤16🔥3👏2
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @Mustafa4Bio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 62,139 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
الاستاذ هشام المعموري @hish84 · 256,088 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
الاستاذ علي السوداني @ALSudaneAli · 221,893 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
برلين للتعليم @X4DDD · 219,298 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“م. م. مصطفى عقيل | Asst. Lect. Mustafa Aqeel” (@Mustafa4Bio), 11,822 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mustafa4Bio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
