⚡️ JUST IN: A Circle shareholder is suing Trump over World Liberty’s sale of a $500 million stake to the UAE and its $2 billion deal with Binance. ✅ Trade on WEEX 💸 Ajaa'ibsiisoo
🤗8🎉5👏5😘5👌4🍓3🎄3💋3

Channel
@Ajaaibsiiso
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
60,609subscribers
+22,054 since we began measuring on 31 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001779219128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ajaaibsiiso |
| Description | Ajaa’ibsiisoo shares real USDT projects, Web3 tools, airdrop links, and earning platforms in the crypto space. Follow for daily updates on tokens, wallets, and passive income ideas from the US 🇺🇸. |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 26 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ajaaibsiiso |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Oct 2026, 01:31 | 60,609 | +195 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 02:19 | 60,414 | -826 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 23:59 | 61,240 | -231 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 22:46 | 61,471 | -103 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:36 | 61,574 | -229 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 21:16 | 61,803 | -317 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 00:09 | 62,120 | +668 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 22:10 | 61,452 | +1,821 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 19:06 | 59,631 | +2,127 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 09:56 | 57,504 | +5,796 |
| 9 Oct 2026, 05:58 | 51,708 | +2,756 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 16:20 | 48,952 | +2,044 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 13:59 | 46,908 | +5,606 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:36 | 41,302 | +1,882 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:37 | 39,420 | +342 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 39,078 | +165 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 38,913 | +91 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 38,822 | +176 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:18 | 38,646 | +101 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 38,545 | first reading |
280 posts held, back to 25 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 92 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 280 (25 August 2026 – 22 October 2026) |
| Views total | 1,932,580 |
| Reactions total | 10,428 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Oct 2026, 04:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
20,637 reactions across 280 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 3.32% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 685 | 3.32% | |
| 🎉 | 665 | 3.22% | |
| 🤗 | 659 | 3.19% | |
| 👍 | 648 | 3.14% | |
| 😍 | 630 | 3.05% | |
| ❤ | 622 | 3.01% | |
| 😁 | 619 | 3.00% | |
| 🌭 | 611 | 2.96% | |
| 🤩 | 596 | 2.89% | |
| 💋 | 586 | 2.84% | |
| 🤣 | 568 | 2.75% | |
| 😎 | 565 | 2.74% | |
| 🍌 | 562 | 2.72% | |
| 🔥 | 562 | 2.72% | |
| 😇 | 550 | 2.67% | |
| 😘 | 540 | 2.62% | |
| 🐳 | 537 | 2.60% | |
| 🍓 | 530 | 2.57% | |
| 💯 | 500 | 2.42% | |
| 🎄 | 487 | 2.36% | |
| 34 further kinds | 8,915 | 43.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 280 of the 280 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20,637 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 280 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚡️ JUST IN: A Circle shareholder is suing Trump over World Liberty’s sale of a $500 million stake to the UAE and its $2 billion deal with Binance. ✅ Trade on WEEX 💸 Ajaa'ibsiisoo
🤗8🎉5👏5😘5👌4🍓3🎄3💋3
🤓 AI Uncovers a Critical PHP Vulnerability As part of its Patch the Planet initiative, OpenAI used AI to discover a serious flaw in PHP. Researcher Calif identified further issues with GPT-5.6 Sol, and Wiz independently uncovered two more. Over the following two months, OpenAI, Wiz, Cloudflare, and other teams worked with PHP developers to prepare fixes before disclosing the vulnerabilities. OpenAI has pledged $1 …
🥰8😁8🍓7😇5🙉4⚡3👌3😍3
👎 15 crypto projects whose tokens have lost nearly all their value Seven leading analysts raised concerns about the outlook for 15 crypto projects. Combined, they raised $855 million, but their current TVL is only around $171 million. ➡️ ZKsync Era: $258 million raised; $14.48 million in TVL. ➡️ Dymension: around $154,000 in TVL. ➡️ Mode: around $621,000 in TVL, with its token down 99.93% from its peak. ➡️ Flow:…
💋11😎9😇7✍6🎃5⚡4🎄3👍2
⚡️ BREAKING: Robinhood has won approval in Dubai to offer crypto and stock trading across the Middle East starting in 2027. ✅ Trade on WEEX 💸 Ajaa'ibsiisoo
🤷6⚡4🌭4😘4🏆3🤔3🍓2😱2
⚡️ BREAKING: Fireblocks has denied reports that Visa is buying the company for $2.5 billion, calling them “not true at this time.” ✅ Trade on WEEX 💸 Ajaa'ibsiisoo
😭5🍾4👏4😈3👌1😘1
😯 Prediction Markets Are Coming to DeFi DefiLlama and Trueo are bringing prediction markets to DeFi revenue and security events. Trade on outcomes related to Hyperliquid, Pump.fun, Aerodrome, Uniswap, Collector Crypt, and Papertrade. You can also forecast monthly hack risks for Aave and Morpho, losses from DeFi exploits, the biggest hack of the week or month, DEX volume and RWA market cap on Robinhood Chain, and we…
😎3👻2
⚡️ BREAKING: Visa is reportedly in talks to buy Fireblocks for about $2.5 billion, according to Bloomberg. ✅ Trade on WEEX 💸 Ajaa'ibsiisoo
🤓2
⚡️ JUST IN: a16z is dropping “Crypto” from the name of its flagship blockchain fund as it broadens its investment focus. The fund’s founding member is also set to depart. ✅ Trade on WEEX 💸 Ajaa'ibsiisoo
🍾4👍1
☝️ Pumpfun launches Pump Bridge Pumpfun (PUMP) has introduced Pump Bridge, its default option for cross-chain token trading. Following tests conducted from September 28 to October 7, the company reported: ➡️ Failed purchases: 0.9%, compared with 11.2% on Relay—nearly 13 times fewer. ➡️ Execution quality: Market-price deviation was about 17% lower. ➡️ Potential savings: Making 10 trades of $500 each day could save…
🤩3😭3🔥2🤷1
⚡️ JUST IN: China is moving to seize 61,800 BTC linked to a $5.7 billion fraud. ✅ Trade on WEEX 💸 Ajaa'ibsiisoo
🤓2😈2🌭1👌1🤩1🤷1😴1
✅ Trade with WEEX 💸 Ajaa'ibsiisoo
🤝4🗿2❤1😁1
⚡️ BREAKING: Lighter is reportedly set to apply for a U.S. license next month. If approved, it could be listed on Robinhood’s U.S. platform. ✅ Trade on WEEX 💸 Ajaa'ibsiisoo
🥰15👍6😈6✍4🤝4🌭3👏3💩3
Showing the 12 most recent of 280 posts we hold for @Ajaaibsiiso. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ajaa'ibsiisoo” (@Ajaaibsiiso), 60,609 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ajaaibsiiso.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.