22 measurements spanning 23 days, net -926. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,235–22,439 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 06:08
21,374
-46
29 Aug 2026, 04:24
21,420
-18
28 Aug 2026, 07:33
21,438
-43
27 Aug 2026, 05:57
21,481
-46
26 Aug 2026, 05:11
21,527
-30
25 Aug 2026, 05:22
21,557
-39
24 Aug 2026, 01:24
21,596
-78
22 Aug 2026, 06:05
21,674
-39
21 Aug 2026, 01:03
21,713
-28
19 Aug 2026, 22:02
21,741
-63
18 Aug 2026, 18:34
21,804
-59
17 Aug 2026, 17:15
21,863
-48
16 Aug 2026, 14:23
21,911
-67
14 Aug 2026, 21:33
21,978
-72
13 Aug 2026, 11:13
22,050
-25
12 Aug 2026, 13:14
22,075
-57
11 Aug 2026, 11:25
22,132
-55
10 Aug 2026, 07:51
22,187
-44
9 Aug 2026, 07:51
22,231
-23
8 Aug 2026, 09:00
22,254
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 25 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,320
Videos
≈33
Links
≈1,170
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
105 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
35
33.3%
🥰
22
21.0%
🔥
18
17.1%
😢
11
10.5%
❤
7
6.67%
❤🔥
2
1.90%
😱
2
1.90%
🤝
2
1.90%
⚡
1
0.952%
🎉
1
0.952%
👌
1
0.952%
😍
1
0.952%
🙏
1
0.952%
🫡
1
0.952%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 January 2025 to 23 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
New Loot From Perplexity 🔥🔥🔥
Earn Upto 20$ Per Refer (Depending On Country) + Extra Bonus 100$ If You Complete 10 Refer 💀💀
😎Note > Only For Pc/Lap/Mac User
Open https://pplx.ai/hypergamin53433 On Your Pc - Download Comet Browser
Install Comet Browser - Now Go To Perplexity Ai In Comet - Login In Perplexity With Gmail
Chat Something With Ai 4-5 Question - Now U Can See Invite Option Below Just Copy Your Link 🔥🔥
…
📰 PAWS Listing Update!
🔎On Twitter, PAWS Developers dropped a hint with a picture showing day and month. Maybe the date is for the $PAWS listing. You can see in the alarm clock, the day is Tuesday and month is March. It means it can be any Tuesday In This Month.
📰PAWS Airdrop Checker Is Live!
🔎Go And Check Your Allocation In Website By Logging In Through Bot Or Connected Wallet
⚠️Update: PAWS Allocation Checker Is Not Working Properly. They said they will solve it.
📰PAWS Mining Season Is Finally Ended
📌The PAWS MiniAPP & The PAWS Channel Got Deleted Because Of Telegram's New Policy To Launch Only On Ton Network. But PAWS Team Chose To Launch It On Solana
Don't Worry, They Already Backed Up All The Data In PAWS Website
⚠️Make Sure To Double Check That You Did Everything Correctly
Whether It Is "Connecting Wallets" In PAWS Website Or "Activity Check"
🤫And You Can Easily Login …
https://t.me/+enddv8nKAZVkMDBh
you can win $5 each person don't miss
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @AirdropDybala. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 531,007 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@AirdropDybala named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@pawsog_bot named in 16 posts, 8 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
@verifierp_bot named in 7 posts, 8 August 2026 – 24 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Airdrop Denver @AirdropDenver · 154,113 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Airdrop Dybala” (@AirdropDybala), 21,374 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AirdropDybala.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.