اني ساره من الكراده🙊💋سويت كروب من الضوجه وجمعت صديقاتي🙈💜تعالوا نسولف شويه 😳😋👇🏿 https://t.me/+1JUAZ8WKzM9jMThi

Channel
ستوريات❤ رمِــــــــزيــآت ❤ اقتباسات ❤ بًنِأّتٌ ❤
@zz_2b
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
903,734subscribers
+52,932 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001502031115 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zz_2b |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zz_2b |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 903,734 | -4,885 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:42 | 908,619 | +8,477 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 900,142 | +3,576 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:46 | 896,566 | +16,426 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 880,140 | +29,338 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:15 | 850,802 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 21 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.042%
- avg views ÷ 903,734 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 384
- 16 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (21 February 2023 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,141 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
4,320 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,918 | 67.5% | |
| 💔 | 868 | 20.1% | |
| 😢 | 534 | 12.4% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,320reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 21 February 2023 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
عزاااااا ولج عزاااااا♥️😹 - عمري كله بلتلي اني مشفت مثل الونسه الي بهاي الكروب - لج كلها العاب و فقرات ☹️🙊 - اذا نتي بنيه و ضايجة تعالي وتونسي😹♥️ https://t.me/+URVk71GG0BJhZmEy
دخيل الكعبه مو كروب براسه حظ💕😍 دردشه مختلطه كله بنات صدك ضيم😉😌❤️👈🏻 وناسة دشووو😉😍🔥🔥🔥 https://t.me/+Tpsz3ou6wxdhMzRi
بس بنات ولد حظر 😭👆👄👄
اني ساره من العراق عمري 18 سنه😉🤭🍓 سويت كروب بس بنات وأريد تدخلون ❤️😻 بس بنات ولد لتجي تنطرد🤤😉☝️🏿 https://t.me/+gMveATLrMVU4MGJi
اني زينب من النجف🙊💋سويت كروب من ضوجه ولميت صديقاتي🙈❤️ تعالوا كلبي 🥺👇🏿 https://t.me/+PT436joK4AI1YWQy
⠀دردشــــه مختلطـــه 😻💛✨ شباب و بنات خليك مثقف 💑💋 بدون مًشاكل ✋🏻 !! كروب محتـــرم سارع قبل حِـَــــــَذف قناة👇 https://t.me/+JBpobC1dFWpiNDQ0
عزاااااا ولج عزاااااا♥️😹 - عمري كله بلتلي اني مشفت مثل الونسه الي بهاي الكروب - لج كلها العاب و فقرات ☹️🙊 - اذا نتي بنيه و ضايجة تعالي وتونسي😹♥️ https://t.me/+zI65yd5XzCZlMmYy
صعدو بل اتصال دك نسوان 🫦
اني زينب من النجف🙊💋سويت كروب من ضوجه ولميت صديقاتي🙈❤️ تعالوا كلبي 🥺👇🏿 https://t.me/+XqlLGojsqtczZmY6
اني فاطمه من بغداد🙊💋سويت كروب من الضوجه وجمعت صديقاتي🙈💜 تعالوا فدواه فاتحين اتصال 🥺👇🏿 https://t.me/+idE_mj93VAUzNDlk
دك #نسوان دز طلب نوافق عليك👄🫦
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @zz_2b. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 247,502 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@as_yuol · 214,6051 postستوريات حب ستوريات انستا صور بنات كروب دردشة
@bsnsnbe · 90,3011 postستوريات 🌿 رمزيات 🎬 اغاني 🎻 اقتباسات🕊
@hwjeki · 911,8301 postاثبات تمويل مشــ͒͜ـــغـٰـــًـوݪ
@vgyuiii00 · 125,7291 postافتارات اغاني كروبات عاشكها.
@zerttti · 90,2901 post- كتابات دوستويفسكي ، اقتباسات حب ، خواطر .
@zrzzzz · 1,363,7811 post- ترتيبات انستا ، افتارات حب ، بايوات 🌿 .
@zzzxz · 993,3021 post- شتاء // Winter 🌧 .
@zzzzi · 109,4621 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@hwjeki · 911,830#1
@llllahll · 118,745#2
@PP_02 · 368,294#3
@F3BBF · 106,357#4
@zzzzzz · 1,630,382#5
@TJ_H5 · 77,585#6
@zx_n7 · 938,138 (as read 8 August 2026)#7
@lvv_me · 30,084#8
@gog788 · 82,536#9
@FF_G4 · 5,356 (as read 8 August 2026)#10
@zrzzzz · 1,363,781#11
@pp_35 · 301,933#12
@XQ_85 · 130,230#13
@za_cvj · 1,452#14
@EG_GB12 · 1,802#15
@MQ_XO · 66,537#16
@llllOOlllllO · 6,451#17
@IHOII · 12,248#18
@l7_ab · 1,807#19
@PPPJP · 3,255,955#20
@zm_n7 · 551,005 (as read 8 August 2026)#21
@ascar99 · 272#22
@hooy_10 · 2,305#23
@t5ttir · 378#24
@Vwllh · 93#25
@PPPPJ · 2,362,428#26
@iiirriiiy · 1,233#27
@thaertk · 519#28
@m_o_nr · 10,413#29
@rfugdigfds · 120#30
@l7_ad · 267 (as read 8 August 2026)#31
@QQQmmma · 5,150#32
@SU_OP · 15,842#33
@ss_zz_sa · 4,701#34
@EFACTO_12 · 1,825 (as read 8 August 2026)#35
@F6YYF · 2,289#36
@AO_5Q · 430 (as read 8 August 2026)#37
@d_q_y2 · 351#38
@J_N_YS · 925#39
@iT64i · 80,548#40
@qxxttp2 · 3,264#41
@l6_lrs · 264#42
@A_H_A64 · 1,234#43
@zzz_ji · 458#44
@ii20ib · 784#45
@Gif2022am · 46,274#46
@ilji7 · 1,262#47
@B_a_r · 142,939#48
@xt_u8 · 5,078#49
@QXNNN · 40,373#50
@iraqed4 · 3,476,934#51
@one_news2026 · 99,699#52
@XJ_93 · 7,506#53
@errzzl · 546,391#54
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@hwjeki · 911,830
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 8 August 2026
@pp_35 · 301,933
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 August 2026
@PP_02 · 368,294
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 10 August 2026
@OX_5m · 289,515
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 August 2026
@zrzzzz · 1,363,781
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 8 August 2026
@yh_u5 · 224,724
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 11 August 2026
@zz_s5 · 255,804
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 10 August 2026
@zzzzzz · 1,630,382
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 8 August 2026
@PP_25 · 153,691
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 12 August 2026
@en_wk · 1,024,669
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 August 2026
@XXX8Z · 262,198
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
@vv1996 · 235,239
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 August 2026
@EN_QE · 845,757
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 8 August 2026
@O6_40 · 333,410
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 14 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ستوريات❤ رمِــــــــزيــآت ❤ اقتباسات ❤ بًنِأّتٌ ❤” (@zz_2b), 903,734 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zz_2b.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.