Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

اقتباسات عبارات ستوريات انستا

@F8FFl

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,225,111subscribers

-2,845 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001503410328
TypeChannel
Username@F8FFl
Description[+] لطلب التمويل | @AAPPX . [+] المحظورين | @vvbpqbot . [+] قنات الثقه | @EETTh .
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/F8FFl

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,224,2171,228,5561,226,386.57 August 2026 — 1,227,956 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,227,956 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,228,556 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,227,384 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,225,003 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,224,217 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,225,111 subscribers1,225,1117 August 202612 August 2026
7 measurements spanning 5 days, net -2,845. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,223,566–1,229,207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:251,225,111+894
11 Aug 2026, 11:041,224,217-786
10 Aug 2026, 12:121,225,003-2,381
9 Aug 2026, 11:061,227,384-1,172
8 Aug 2026, 12:311,228,556+600
7 Aug 2026, 13:001,227,956no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:591,227,956first reading

Engagement

266 posts held, back to 17 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.198%
avg views ÷ 1,225,111 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,430
253 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
253
of 266 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 253 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held266 (17 May 202613 August 2026)
Views total614,149
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:50 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,540
Videos
540
Links
58

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

View velocity

How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.

8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
PostReadingsLatest readingCurve24h reachHalf of last-observed views by
/3227013 Aug 2026, 00:44 UTC16 minutes6 minutes old155 viewsno reaction readingno checkpoint reading yetnot yet at 24hnot measurable yet
/3226713 Aug 2026, 00:36 UTC115 minutes15 minutes old484 viewsno reaction readingno checkpoint reading yetnot yet at 24hnot measurable yet
/3226613 Aug 2026, 00:29 UTC121 minutes21 minutes old673 viewsno reaction readingno checkpoint reading yetnot yet at 24hnot measurable yet
/3226413 Aug 2026, 00:24 UTC126 minutes26 minutes old820 viewsno reaction readingno checkpoint reading yetnot yet at 24hnot measurable yet
/3226213 Aug 2026, 00:08 UTC17 minutes7 minutes old225 viewsno reaction readingno checkpoint reading yetnot yet at 24hnot measurable yet
/3226113 Aug 2026, 00:08 UTC18 minutes8 minutes old303 viewsno reaction readingno checkpoint reading yetnot yet at 24hnot measurable yet
/3226012 Aug 2026, 23:38 UTC23 minutes37 minutes old992 viewsno reaction readingno checkpoint reading yetnot yet at 24h17 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/3225812 Aug 2026, 23:30 UTC211 minutes46 minutes old1,320 views ~no reaction readingno checkpoint reading yetnot yet at 24h18 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing

Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 266 we hold a reading for · 0.8%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @F8FFl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 266 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 May 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Showing the 12 most recent of 266 posts we hold for @F8FFl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,024,467 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اقتباسات عبارات ستوريات انستا” (@F8FFl), 1,225,111 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/F8FFl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.