#菲律宾资讯:15名中国公民在菲律宾三宝颜锡布盖省阿莉西亚市获警方救出 10月12日下午1时过后,警方在菲律宾三宝颜锡布盖省阿莉西亚市的 Tandiong Muslim 村(Barangay Tandiong Muslim)救出了15名中国公民。 据三宝颜锡布盖省警察办公室称,此次行动是在阿莉西亚市市长直接向市警察局报告相关事件后展开的。接到通报后,阿莉西亚市警察局、省情报单位(PIU)以及第一省机动部队连的警员立即采取行动,核实相关情况。 抵达现场后,当局确认了相关信息,并发现了15名中国公民。这些人均为成年男性,年龄介于25岁至51岁之间。 警方随后将他们带到阿莉西亚市警察局进行登记和身份核实,之后安排他们前往阿莉西亚农村卫生中心接受体检。 预计这些人员将被移交给菲律宾移民局,由该部门依法办理相关手续并展开进一步调查。 截至目前,当局尚未公布更多细节,包括他们获救的具体原因,以及在被发现之前究竟发生了什么。 —…

Channel
东南亚|曝光|吃瓜|寻人
@jinbian8
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
44,226subscribers
-16,066 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001937008648 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jinbian8 |
| Description | #东南亚 #柬埔寨 #泰国 #缅甸 #曝光 东南亚曝光频道专注于东南亚华人最新动态,吃瓜、寻人、生活故事分享,关注我们每天都有好心情。 爆料投稿联系:@jpz8i8 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 24 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 22 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jinbian8 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Oct 2026, 10:19 | 44,226 | -858 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 21:37 | 45,084 | -2,029 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 09:15 | 47,113 | -2,459 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 19:38 | 49,572 | -4,895 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:39 | 54,467 | +11,024 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:14 | 43,443 | -1,404 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:42 | 44,847 | -1,624 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 46,471 | -1,072 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 47,543 | -1,508 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 49,051 | -2,343 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 51,394 | -2,160 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 03:21 | 53,554 | -1,604 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 55,158 | -2,637 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:54 | 57,795 | -703 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 01:43 | 58,498 | -757 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 59,255 | -827 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 60,082 | -698 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 60,780 | -682 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 61,462 | -390 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 61,852 | first reading |
Engagement
1,006 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.681%
- avg views ÷ 44,226 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 301
- 615 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 615
- of 1,006 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,006 (24 August 2026 – 14 October 2026) |
| Views total | 185,254 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Oct 2026, 02:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈41,100
- Videos
- ≈6,210
- Links
- ≈17,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 5h 22m
- Average length
- 1m 10s
Measured directly from 276 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
#紧急呼吁:为缅甸 Koe Maa Nee 园区的印度受害者伸张正义! 缅甸 Koe Maa Nee 园区据称仍有大量印度人被困并遭受剥削,相关情况亟需引起关注。 一名印度幸存者表示,为了获得释放,他被迫支付了 9,000 美元。由于家庭经济状况困难,他不得不向家人和朋友借钱。他还声称,自己在园区内遭受了严重的虐待和折磨。 如今,他要求园区管理方退还这笔钱,但据称管理方拒绝退款,并表示无法处理此事。 他已准备好公开 WhatsApp 聊天记录、照片、视频及其他相关证据,希望揭露涉嫌虐待和经济剥削的行为,并为自己及其他可能仍被困的人争取正义。 这不仅仅是 9,000 美元的问题,更关乎人的尊严、责任与无数家庭所承受的痛苦。 沉默不应成为涉嫌施害者的保护伞,获救的受害者不应被抛弃! 呼吁印度政府、媒体及人权组织关注此案,展开公正、严肃、独立的调查,追究相关责任,并帮助受害者获得应有的公正与支持。请转发,让更多人关注此事…
柬埔寨内政部:已经抓了77名警察 柬埔寨内政部部长发言人任拉塔纳对媒体表示,政府开展强力打击网络诈骗行动以来,已有77名涉案的国家警察被逮捕并判刑入狱。 任拉塔纳表示,柬埔寨政府迄今为止一直在以极为严厉的手腕清除网络诈骗犯罪。多个主要头目已被抓获,部分在柬埔寨服刑,部分已被遣返回原籍国。 任拉塔纳说,“大型窝点已被关闭,约40万名涉案外国人员已被驱逐出境以及自愿离境。” 不过,发言人也承认,网络诈骗犯罪仍在继续发生,表现形式为零星分散形式,也有人企图再次进行大规模运作。但执法部门绝不姑息,一旦接到情报,必须彻底清除并断绝所有犯罪链条。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8
缅甸佤邦抓获3名中国籍在逃人员,已通过边境口岸移交中方! 10月14日,佤邦联合军(UWSA)发布通报称,应中国方面协查请求,佤邦有关人员近日成功抓获3名被中方通缉的中国籍在逃人员,并通过中缅边境勐阿口岸移交中国有关部门。 据通报,此次移交同时移送了涉案证据材料及人员身份信息。不过,官方尚未披露3人的具体涉案罪名及案件详情。 此外,佤邦方面曾于10月5日通过边境口岸向中国移交32名非法入境的中国籍人员。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️全球直登 ⚡️BBIN 联合迪威娱乐城 联手打造优质娱乐平台! 新会员首存赠送100%彩金(仅限ABA和加密货币) ⚡️支持 微信 支付宝 银行卡 充值 ⚡️支持 USDT ABA 充值 ⚡️支持 波币 NO钱包 购宝 多种钱包 充值 ⚡️24小时存取不打烊 ⚡️充值提现实时到账 🧂⚽️🏀🏈⚾️🥎🎾🏐 ⚡️官方频道: @diwei4 ⚡️官方客服: @diwei2 ⚡️官方代理:@diwei3 ⚡️官方网址: diwei.app ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ ⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️
🇺🇸 美司法部:跨国打击行动重创西非诈骗网络 上周,在一场多国联合开展的“联合打击周”行动中,基地位于西非的跨国网络诈骗集团遭到重创。 本次行动取得了显著成效:共抓获数十名犯罪嫌疑人,成功解救100多名人口贩卖受害者,并彻底封禁与该地区诈骗中心关联的370多万个虚假社交媒体账号,创下历史最大规模封号纪录。 美国司法部对此表示,此次大规模封号与逮捕行动仅是专项打击的开端。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8
#群友爆料:这家黑公司!位置是菲律宾棉兰老岛南哥打巴托省 Isulan(伊苏兰)市中心的一个酒店——Hotel Hexandrea。 这里是多个老板合资的公司,里面的物业和傻逼一样,这辈子没赚过钱。公司主管也是傻逼,一天天就想着怎么把钱搞进自己口袋里,业务上的事情根本毛都不懂。 我待了半个月,这种地方看不到一点希望。组长也都是傻逼,每天对主管阿谀奉承,根本不敢提任何关于工作上的要求! 这家公司和前段时间被抓的三宝颜两个公司是一起的!主管每天上班想着搞钱进自己腰包,组长每天上班摸鱼,组员一天都在撞南墙。 我真的一天待不下去,也幸好走得早,不然要在哪里陪你们演戏,真的很累!我有没有举报你们,你们自己猜吧!各位好自为之! ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料…
柬埔寨亡人节三天交通事故致26死101伤 同比大幅增加 柬埔寨内政部发言人报告显示,2026年10月10日至12日亡人节三天假期内,柬全国共发生34起交通事故,造成26人死亡、101人受伤。相比2025年同期,事故增加14起,死亡人数增加16人,受伤人数增加71人。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8
🇱🇦老挝加强出租场所监管:包庇电诈人员或被吊销营业执照 10月14日,老挝公安部发布通知,要求全国房东、企业及经济特区加强对出租场所的管理,防止网络诈骗、网络赌博团伙利用租赁物业从事违法活动。** 通知要求,业主如发现可疑行为,应及时向警方报告。对于故意包庇、窝藏涉案人员,或拒不配合调查的责任方,相关部门将视情况予以警告、罚款;经两次警告仍未改正的,可能被责令停业,或被吊销营业执照。 老挝公安部公布的数据显示,2026年前9个月,全国共开展153次打击行动,抓获涉及31个国籍的相关嫌疑人10,651名。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8
据西港省旅游局报告,在亡人节三天假期期间,西港省累计接待前往各景区、岛屿、海滩及旅游目的地休闲观光的国内外游客共计195,994人次,其中本地游客190,122人次,外国游客5,872人次。 去年亡人节接待16万,今年19万,还大幅增长了,牛逼! ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8
#群友爆料:西港星际赌场杀猪爆雷,靠非法巨型牌罩和公关人员配合作弊!! 这个赌场除了两桌本地演员以外,没有任何散客,所有的桌子都是给出码人员去打的,猫腻就出现在这些出码牌桌上。出码牌桌的牌靴顺序是赌场公关人员知道的,每张牌什么顺序,他们在监控室都知道。 最重要的来了,星际百家乐的桌子有一个工具是牌罩。正常赌场只是一个盖子压在上面,星际的闲庄补牌的那里有一个巨大的罩子盖着两张牌,荷官给你发哪张,你坐在牌桌上根本看不到。 荷官听监控公关指挥,根据玩家下注的情况,会把该给闲补的牌补给庄,补给庄的在牌罩里偷偷挪给闲。比如,你买庄,正常补牌会赢的情况下,公关就会在耳机提醒荷官发闲的补牌,直接把庄补死或者不够点。 为了避免被发现,每次有出码的玩家在打牌的情况下,桌子周围会瞬间围满赌场的工作人员。两个人挡在荷官的手后面,让人看不到荷官换牌;两个人在后面看着玩家。这种情况下,就算是赌神在世,进了这个局也只能死! 现在西港没人了,他们这…
柬埔寨内政部回应半岛电视台纪录片:坚决否认保护伞质疑 针对半岛电视台纪录片揭露七星海长湾诈骗园区及华裔商人邓丕兵声称“八成收益用于打点关系”一事,柬埔寨内政部副发言人杜速克回应称,这纯属邓丕兵个人夸大事实、炫耀背景的吹嘘行为,绝无政府机构或官员与其分红。 关于视频中出现的警车,杜速克强调,政府严禁公车私用或为非法活动打掩护,不排除私自改装或假冒警车的可能。 针对涉案的“长湾”园区,内政部证实警方此前已对其展开行政检查与打击封锁,目前案件正依法深挖,坚决打击利用国家资源与合法投资掩盖非法勾当的行为。 ———————————————— 📣欢迎加入东南亚华人交流群 🔗 https://t.me/dnyhr0 📣西港日记/柬埔寨新闻资讯 🔗:https://t.me/xigang8I8 ✅广告招商投稿澄清爆料: @jpz8i8
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,006 posts we hold for @jinbian8. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@bx666 · 463,633#1
@jpz_888 · 12,477#2
@jianpuzhaidashijian · 44,605#3
@xigang6 · 4,473#4
@jinbianzufang888 · 1,363#5
@xigangfangdican918 · 144#6
@xigangB6 · 661#7
@ws3377 · 64#8
@dnyggg · 42,822#9
@JianHuaNews · 167#10
@SB919 · 128,758#11
@renshizhizhao6 · 1,220#12
@TG_DJ777 · 116,912#13
@mupai77 · 4,297#14
@jinbianyy · 26,982#15
@DNYTJL3 · 90,544#16
@pyzcn · 221,296#17
@bx777 · 35,560#18
@jpzdh1 · 51,432#19
@JPZtudou · 1,250#20
@chiguaqunzhong001 · 1,490#21
@xinwen1 · 103,826#22
@dubai0 · 94,481#23
@jianpuzhaiFBI · 7,136#24
@jpzdh0 · 51,143#25
@AQzx_2 · 53,436#26
@xgrj0 · 156,942#27
@jinbian818 · 39,931#28
@xigang8I8 · 148,745#29
@jianpuzhaiuuuu · 15,916#30
@jdw168 · 6,748#31
@jianpuzhaihuarenzixun · 78,983#32
@mupai717 · 8,117#33
@CYfangchan888 · 1,365#34
@gaoxiao112411 · 227#35
@jinbianfangchan · 1,103#36
@xigangzufang666 · 9,272#37
@sucai1 · 59,748#38
@wjcy168 · 1,404#39
@xigangzufangzi · 9,617#40
@xigangzuche666 · 4,633#41
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 25 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@jinbian818 · 39,931
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 25 August 2026
@xigang8I8 · 148,745
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“东南亚|曝光|吃瓜|寻人” (@jinbian8), 44,226 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jinbian8.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.