Channel
@Ineedmyownnation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
178subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001060250151 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Ineedmyownnation |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Ineedmyownnation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:05 | 178 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 179 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 179 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 26 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 June 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
可能需要重新强调这件事：https://t.me/iyouport/12696 以防疫为名的社会控制暴力，对89后中国社会延续了三十多年的社会行为常规形成了强烈冲击； 对监视和限制的共同愤怒，在某些程度上让人们变得重新默契起来。而这，正是对政权最大的威胁。 因此，对镇压来说，他们必须能够实现重新拆散这个社会， 让人们重新回到彼此猜忌、人人自危、消极诠释、竞争和攀比的散沙状态， 这才是一个社会最容易被控制的状态。 要做到这点，只靠抓人可不行。抓再多人都没用。镇压当局必须能挑拨社会心理的深层弱点，才能再次离间人们。 白纸行动构建的这个新的 “默契契约” 非常脆弱，因为这是一场反抗行动，而非反叛行动 - 这有着根本性不同； 换句话说，这场行动没有建立在构建新的系统/秩序以对现有系统形成挑战和抗衡的大战略基础之上，这意味着行动本身及其后的社会仍然在同一个系统中存在，并继续受其影响。 这就是它的脆弱性所在。 留住火种并…
機智小伙分享如何拒絕被割韭菜。中共欺騙老百姓為黨接盤是越來越不好使了，而且漸漸的，人民也越來越敢說了。😁😁
https://youtu.be/OHlqhrsSYzA
中共土改殺人酷刑黑歷史，殘忍手段令人髮指。這不是一個正常的政權，它嗜血、變態，以仇恨為燃料，不斷的發動人民殘酷鬥爭人民，讓每個人都成為受害者。
https://www.reddit.com/r/China_irl/comments/zdz7ty/中华民国和台湾的未来/
靑天白日不能再被國民黨霸佔了
20221204-ls (3).jpg
消息称，广州地铁正在检查身份证。 📌提醒注意上面关于镇压的提示： - 我们正在讲述的是针对所有人的镇压，而不只是行动者； - 目前最佳的保护措施是，告知所有人尽可能减少主动的报备 —— 尽可能不去做核酸、尽可能不扫任何二维码、尽可能完全使用现金支付、尽可能绕开所有要求出示身份证的地方（地铁要求身份证那就不坐地铁）。以此类推！ #tips #China #ZeroCovidPolicy #protest
有人和一个大白的对话 source
以下内容来自读者投递，有措辞方面的轻微编辑，无语意改动。 —— 中国大陆社会行动者安全指南 —— 请顺序阅读，以对应参考您的具体状况。 0. 无论如何，不要使用未经处理的中国大陆版设备，无论是什么厂商；不要使用华为手机，无论是否大陆版本；不要佩戴任何智能穿戴设备参与敏感行动；您携带的电子设备应该越少越好，最好完全不包含您的身份识别信息。 1. 如果您没有直接参与行动，但生活在容易被审查的区域： a. 分开生活用设备和翻墙的设备。如果可以，不要包含您的个人识别信息，或额外为这些应用上锁，并施加物理信号屏蔽。（如您不参与行动则没有必要） b. 无论能否做到 a，都为这部手机开启第二个用户。[如您使用 Xiaomi 手机，并使用 MIUI，这个功能应该叫做手机分身。] c. 准备蜜罐资料：将国内的 App 安装在主资料，提供给审查人员最无关痛痒的信息。（应该最快解锁、最方便到达、没有直观开关，并且不容易被察…
1、这是读者提供的图片，描述了抗议现场隐藏便衣警察的状况。 这是非常常见的，也正是我们此前介绍的黑群行动模式旨在对抗的局面之一 ～ 在行动中保持匿名，彼此照护。香港采取的就是类似的战术。在这里看到具体做法：https://iyouport.substack.com/p/-black-bloc 如果您对此感兴趣，请务必仔细研究其中的注意事项，这些事项非常重要！ 👌 再一次强调3个原则： a; 战术选择应完全且仅基于战略需求，此外的一切都不是决定性条件。回避扯皮的浪费时间； b; 率先选取您熟悉的战术和安全措施，当您知道自己在做什么的时候是您可以做得最好的时候； c; 巧妙，创意，出其不意，才是加分项！而非力量。不要给镇压者使用暴力的机会。 👍 赞美前天出现在 云南大理街头的弹着吉他唱歌的游行者。抗议活动并不必须是痛苦的和高风险的，它完全可以载歌载舞，免费啤酒喝起来！轻松欢快的场面反而更容易吸引大量人群加入您！ 智慧是您最…
各地的廣場舞、廣場音樂會可以搞起來了
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Ineedmyownnation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,115,310 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“光復民國訊息站” (@Ineedmyownnation), 178 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Ineedmyownnation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.