Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 53 days, net -501. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,223–21,874 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 20:19
21,298
-67
17 Sept 2026, 22:17
21,365
-18
14 Sept 2026, 08:56
21,383
-6
12 Sept 2026, 19:20
21,389
-27
10 Sept 2026, 22:00
21,416
-45
7 Sept 2026, 21:01
21,461
-41
4 Sept 2026, 23:58
21,502
-1
3 Sept 2026, 09:16
21,503
-16
2 Sept 2026, 03:25
21,519
-4
1 Sept 2026, 06:26
21,523
-20
31 Aug 2026, 07:44
21,543
-10
30 Aug 2026, 10:37
21,553
-1
29 Aug 2026, 13:43
21,554
-12
28 Aug 2026, 14:56
21,566
-5
27 Aug 2026, 14:44
21,571
-8
26 Aug 2026, 12:16
21,579
-15
25 Aug 2026, 12:55
21,594
-9
24 Aug 2026, 14:13
21,603
-16
22 Aug 2026, 23:44
21,619
-2
21 Aug 2026, 09:54
21,621
first reading
Engagement
312 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.82%
avg views ÷ 21,298 subscribers
Avg views / post
814
26 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.57%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
26
of 312 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026
Posts held
312 (3 August 2026 – 27 September 2026)
Views total
21,157
Reactions total
1,389
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Sept 2026, 10:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 07m
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 80 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16,352 reactions across 311 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5890920625718957812
4,035
24.7%
🔥
2,044
12.5%
🤬
1,145
7.00%
🎉
979
5.99%
🫡
806
4.93%
💯
786
4.81%
👏
782
4.78%
🤣
694
4.24%
🏆
622
3.80%
🤩
595
3.64%
❤
575
3.52%
😢
412
2.52%
💔
399
2.44%
😁
399
2.44%
👌
353
2.16%
❤🔥
311
1.90%
👍
292
1.79%
custom 4904881857809614154
218
1.33%
😡
200
1.22%
⚡
184
1.13%
11 further kinds
521
3.19%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 311 of the 312 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,352 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 312 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 312 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wc_israel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 312 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🚫🔥Second US military underwater drone seized in the Strait of Hormuz
🚫 IRGC Navy:
IRGC Navy fighters, with the help of Almighty Allah, carried out a coordinated and complex operation using intelligence surveillance and electronic warfare, managing to trap an advanced US military underwater drone that was operating in the Strait of Hormuz for espionage.
The drone was an advanced intelligent underwater vehicle, th…
In exclusive footage from Al-Manar, the Master of Martyrs of the Ummah, Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, is seen among his people — close to them, checking on them, sharing their moments, and finding warmth in their familiar faces.
Tonight, we mark the second anniversary of the departure of the leader and Master of Martyrs…
27/9/2024 — Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah 💔
Some leaders don’t simply pass through history — they write it. Two years have gone by, yet the path only grows stronger, and his words still live on as an army of their own.
To you, our beloved ones — the purest, noblest, and most honorable of people — peace, mercy, and blessings of …
🚫Hamas Political Bureau chief Khalil al-Hayya, speaking to Al Araby TV:
Hamas offered to mediate between the parties fighting in Yemen, and we hope the offer is accepted.
The region is basically sitting on a powder keg, and the key to its stability is the Palestinian people.
I’m one of the Palestinian people who has lost his sons, and these sacrifices only make me more determined and more committed to keep going u…
🚫☦️🇵🇸A 9-year-old #Christian boy from Quds' Armenian community was attacked with pepper spray by land-thief terrorist jevvs while riding his bike.
The Zombie jevvs confronted the boy, William, and told him to take off his headphones.
After hearing him speak English, they shouted, “No English, Jevvs!” and sprayed him with pepper spray.
Despite CCTV footage of the incident, occupation regime's police closed the case…
🚫🔥Occupation regime's media quoting informants:
The 29 US sailors and Marines listed as the latest casualties of the Iran war were actually wounded in an Iranian attack on a US warship.
🚫A new Bloomberg investigation says Ansarullah is becoming less dependent on getting ready-made weapons from Iran.
They’ve built international procurement networks and their own local manufacturing capabilities, letting them buy civilian and dual-use components from Chinese markets and turn them inside Yemen into missiles, drones and other combat systems.
🚫A new threat from Saudi air defenses to the Houthis and Iran :)))
Following the release of this absolute banger, Ansarullah has reportedly retreated, while Iran is already preparing to reopen the Strait of Hormuz — unconditionally, of course!
From the dream of breaking Iran apart to the nightmare of packing their bags — 400 days was all it took!
;)
😎21custom 490488185780961415418😁8
Showing the 12 most recent of 312 posts we hold for @wc_israel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@wc_israel edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
2 September 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
GAZA NOW IN ENGLISH @gazaalanpa · 174,190 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 12 August 2026
Quds News Network @QudsNen · 113,200 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 14 August 2026
Stay Free @stayfreeworld · 41,257 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Middle East Eye @MiddleEastEye_TG · 57,243 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
Middle East Observer @me_observer_TG · 38,636 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
Press TV @presstv · 93,083 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 August 2026
The Cradle @thecradlemedia · 55,943 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
AlHaq News | Iran-US War Updates @AlHaqNews · 32,330 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
ResistanceTrench mirror @RezistanceTrench · 42,507 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 29 August 2026
Global News Monitor @warmonitors · 151,593 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
IRNA News Agency 🇮🇷 @Irna_en · 25,932 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 13 September 2026
WarfareAnalysis News @WarfareAnalysis · 31,556 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 5 September 2026
Lebanese News and Updates @LebUpdate · 77,232 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 August 2026
Enemy Watch — Official @enemywatch · 29,035 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 8 September 2026
Fotros Resistance @FotrosResistancee · 68,823 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 August 2026
Islamic World News @iswnews_en · 20,983 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 September 2026
Shaun King @ShaunKingChannel · 53,469 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
Israel War Live @IsraelWarLive · 31,200 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
Skuad Al-Qassam @skuadpemudaislam · 29,358 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 8 September 2026
Middle East Spectator — MES @middle_east_spectator · 404,635 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝟰𝗺𝘂𝘀𝗹𝗶𝗺 @stand4muslim · 42,148 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Megatron @megatron_ron · 76,116 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
WarFront Witness @wfwitness · 81,256 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Eye On Palestine @Eyeonpalestine2 · 38,292 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 31 August 2026
This channel appears in 38 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"israel" is a War Criminal 🇵🇸” (@wc_israel), 21,298 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wc_israel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.