10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -251. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 42,927โ43,254 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 09:34
42,965
-44
15 Aug 2026, 16:18
43,009
-37
14 Aug 2026, 03:28
43,046
-23
13 Aug 2026, 00:03
43,069
-20
11 Aug 2026, 22:44
43,089
-36
10 Aug 2026, 23:43
43,125
-21
10 Aug 2026, 02:31
43,146
-29
9 Aug 2026, 02:31
43,175
-15
7 Aug 2026, 23:02
43,190
-26
7 Aug 2026, 01:15
43,216
first reading
Engagement
185 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
2.35%
avg views รท 42,965 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,010
184 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.56%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
185
of 185 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
185 (6 August 2026 โ 17 August 2026)
Views total
185,821
Reactions total
8,471
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Aug 2026, 00:04 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
โ157,000
Videos
โ73,900
Links
โ5,810
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 18 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
28m 12s
Average length
1m 14s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
8,471 reactions across 184 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
๐
1,981
23.4%
๐ฅ
1,670
19.7%
โค
1,522
18.0%
๐ฏ
763
9.01%
๐คฌ
613
7.24%
๐
521
6.15%
๐
480
5.67%
๐
326
3.85%
๐ซก
291
3.44%
โคโ๐ฅ
97
1.15%
๐คจ
84
0.992%
๐ฅฐ
33
0.39%
๐ข
28
0.331%
๐
20
0.236%
โก
17
0.201%
๐
8
0.094%
๐ฑ
4
0.047%
๐คฏ
4
0.047%
๐
3
0.035%
๐
2
0.024%
3 further kinds
4
0.047%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 184 of the 185 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 8,471reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 185 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Kekecewaan terhadap Washington semakin meningkat dalam kalangan sekutu AS di Teluk, dengan para pegawai semakin memandang pengendalian Presiden Trump terhadap perang Iran sebagai "tidak menentu" dan "tidak dapat diramal", serta meragui sama ada Washington mampu memberikan penyelesaian diplomatik untuk mengakhiri konflik tersebut, lapor WaPo.
Pegawai-pegawai dari Arab Saudi, UAE, Qatar, Kuwait, dan Bahrain bersatu daโฆ
Jurucakap Kementerian Luar Iran, Esmaeil Baghaei:
Dalam memorandum persefahaman itu, tiada apa-apa yang menetapkan tempoh 60 hari dan Iran tidak menerima untuk diletakkan di bawah tekanan masa, sebaliknya kami bertindak mengikut kepentingan nasional kami.
Perundingan mengenai Hormuz adalah rumit dan kompleks, dan apabila kita bercakap tentang kedaulatan dua buah negara ke atasnya iaitu Oman dan Iran, ia memerlukan โฆ
La la la la. Dengar cerita ada lagi 6gorillion tahanan dekat penjara sendayan.
Al Sharaa taknak usaha tarik keluar ke ? Tengok syok bersalam dengan Trump, takkan tak helo helo mintak rescue team tolong.
Ha3. 6 gorillion. Hebat betul Iran boleh buat fasiliti memuatkan 6 gorillion tahanan dekat sendayan.
Akhbar Ibrani Yedioth Ahronoth:
Insiden yang berlaku pada hujung minggu lalu, yang dianggap sebagai antara insiden paling serius sejak bermulanya gencatan senjata, sekali lagi menunjukkan bahawa walaupun serangan berterusan dilakukan ke atas pemimpin dan infrastruktur Hezbollah, kumpulan tersebut masih memiliki keupayaan untuk melancarkan dron dan membentuk pasukan penyerang di selatan Lubnan.
Akhbar Ibrani Yedioth Ahronoth:
Tentera Israel dan industri pertahanan telah menguji lebih daripada seratus penyelesaian berbeza yang direka untuk menagani dan memintas dron-dron membawa bom milik Hezbollah, dan sebahagian daripadanya telah dipindahkan ke peringkat ujian lapangan.
Antara penyelesaian ini ialah sistem "Iron Drone Raider" yang telah ditempatkan di selatan Lubnan, yang terdiri daripada radar dan dron โฆ
Seekor lagi tentera Israel menamatkan nyawanya selepas pulang dari Gaza.
Yedioth Ahronoth: Sarjan Mejar (res.) tentera Israel Uriel Molto Getahon, 24, meninggal dunia akibat membunuh diri pada hari Khamis selepas pulang dari Gaza.
Menurut media Ibrani, abang kepada rakan Getahon, Sarjan Staf Avraham Ovgan dari Batalion ke-932 Briged Nahal, yang dibunuh oleh Briged Al-Qassam di utara Gaza pada Februari 2024, menulisโฆ
Poster kempen baharu Likud di Israel telah dikongsikan oleh Netanyahu di media sosial.
Poster itu bertajuk "Mereka mahu Netanyahu kalah, jangan biarkan mereka menang" berserta imej Zohran Mamdani, Mojtaba Khamenei, Erdogan dan Naim Qassem.
Seorang bekas pegawai tentera Israel juga berkata bahawa simpanan bagi beberapa jenis peluru adalah tidak mencukupi walaupun untuk perang yang singkat, manakala penggunaan peluru sebenar di sesetengah kawasan mencecah dua kali ganda daripada tahap yang diunjurkan.
Haaretz: Perang semasa adalah yang paling mahal dalam sejarah Israel.
Akhbar Haaretz melaporkan bahawa perang yang bermula pada 7 Oktober 2023 adalah perang yang paling lama dan paling mahal dalam sejarah Israel, dengan kosnya setakat ini mencecah sekitar 420 bilion syikal Israel ($137.4 bilion).
Angka tersebut dijangka bakal menghampiri separuh trilion syikal ($163.6 bilion) tidak lama lagi.
Menurut laporan itu, โฆ
๐48
Showing the 12 most recent of 185 posts we hold for @stand4muslim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 568,392 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
Firdaus Wong Wai Hung Telegram @brofirdauswong ยท 92,232 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here โ alongside 79 others โ read 17 August 2026
Ceramah Ustaz dan Ustazah @ceramahustazdanustazah ยท 95,029 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 86 here โ alongside 85 others โ read 16 August 2026
Ustaz Wadi Annuar Official @ustazwadiannuar_official ยท 97,902 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 83 here โ alongside 82 others โ read 16 August 2026
1 Hari 1 Hadis @hadisharian_ikram ยท 109,478 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 88 here โ alongside 87 others โ read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ฐ๐บ๐๐๐น๐ถ๐บโ (@stand4muslim), 42,965 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stand4muslim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.