Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ВОТ ЭТО английский

Channel

ВОТ ЭТО английский

@votetoang

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,955subscribers

+39 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002104326858
TypeChannel
Username@votetoang
DescriptionДля тех, кто по-русски ВК: https://vk.com/votetoang https://votetoang.com/ivan № 7526692582
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/votetoang

Growth

23,91623,95523,935.57 August 2026 — 23,916 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,916 subscribers7 August 2026 — 23,917 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,931 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,935 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,939 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,947 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,944 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,951 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,938 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,940 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,947 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,955 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,952 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,947 subscribers23 August 2026 — 23,955 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 16 days, net +39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,910–23,961 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 02:1623,955+8
21 Aug 2026, 14:5623,947-5
20 Aug 2026, 17:1623,952-3
18 Aug 2026, 21:4523,955+8
17 Aug 2026, 22:3323,947+7
16 Aug 2026, 19:0623,940+2
15 Aug 2026, 06:4323,938-13
14 Aug 2026, 00:5423,951+7
12 Aug 2026, 21:5623,944-3
11 Aug 2026, 21:0623,947+8
11 Aug 2026, 00:1123,939+4
9 Aug 2026, 23:3623,935+4
9 Aug 2026, 01:1423,931+14
7 Aug 2026, 21:4223,917+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:4523,916no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:3623,916first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 15 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
30.9%
avg views ÷ 23,955 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,410
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 August 2026
Posts held23 (15 June 202620 August 2026)
Views total44,480
Reactions total1,041
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
52
Videos
6
Links
138

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 29s
Average length
1m 15s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,436 reactions across 23 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2,53857.2%
🔥88019.8%
👍65514.8%
😁1272.86%
🤯541.22%
❤‍🔥430.969%
👏240.541%
🎉120.271%
110.248%
🍾100.225%
🍓90.203%
👀90.203%
🤡80.18%
🥰80.18%
🏆70.158%
🤝70.158%
🙏60.135%
💘50.113%
🕊50.113%
🤗50.113%
6 further kinds130.293%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,436reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 23 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @votetoang. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈3,860 views195 reactions1 Starread 24 August 2026

Начинаем курс китайского с нуля. Учить будет Юлия, а я сажусь за парту вместе с вами: китайского не знаю совсем, так что проверим на мне, реально ли выучить его с нуля. В первом уроке пиньинь и четыре тона, то есть почему mā это «мама», а mǎ уже «лошадь». Плюс первые иероглифы, порядок черт и три фразы, которые пригодятся сразу: 你好, 谢谢, 再见. Знать заранее ничего не нужно. А уже на третьем уроке смотрим мультик на кит

👍93🔥5522👀9🤡5😁4❤‍🔥3🥰2

14 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC≈5,860 views133 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @votetodiaryPhoto

🧠 INNIE ИЛИ OUTIE — КТО ТЫ СЕГОДНЯ? Если вы смотрели захватывающий сериал «Разделение» («Severance»), то знаете эту дилемму. Если нет — ловите лайфхак, который разделит вашу жизнь на «до» и «после». В сериале сотрудники корпорации Lumon проходят процедуру «разделения»: их память раскалывается надвое. Появляются две личности: 🔹 Innie — на рутинной работе. 🔹 Outie — настоящий «я». Эти термины идеально легли на нашу

🔥9131👏6👍4👎1

11 Aug 2026, 16:23 UTC≈6,630 views184 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Продолжаем «Бойцовский клуб», и взял я его вне очереди по личной причине: последнее время совсем плохо со сном, и я как-то слишком хорошо законнектился с главным героем. Снимал этот разбор ночью в офисе, сам полусонный, так что настроение вышло аутентичное. Сегодня взрослые офисные диалоги: бессонница, начальник с его red flags и primary action items, и знаменитый каталог IKEA. Куча живой рабочей лексики, которую ре

125🔥30👍196🍾3🦄1

2 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC≈9,110 views234 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Делаю полный ресет: «Лило и Стич» начинаем с самой первой сцены и дальше идём по порядку, как мультик и снят. Сегодня космический суд над доктором Джамбой и первое появление Стича. Мультик детский, а лексика юридическая и книжная, уровень B2, местами вообще C1. Ну и посмеётесь, шутки там классные. 📺 Смотреть в YouTube 🔵 Смотреть в VK 👉Все ссылки тут https://votetoang.com/ivan

164🔥43👍22💘2🙏21

29 Jul 2026, 16:03 UTC≈10,000 views183 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Лайки под прошлой частью набрались быстро, так что продолжение Гарри Поттера уже здесь. После зоопарка идёт разговор про школу: форма Дадли, которая висит на Гарри как старая слоновья кожа, и первые письма из Хогвартса, от которых дядя Вернон медленно сходит с ума. Разбираем всё, что там говорят, вплоть до британских ругательств вроде bloody и blasted. 📺 Смотреть в YouTube 👉 Все ссылки тут https://votetoang.com/iva

143👍24❤‍🔥12🥰3👏1

28 Jul 2026, 13:26 UTC≈9,020 views112 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @votetodiaryPhoto

Изучение языков через видеоигры Когда меня спрашивают, что я делал, чтобы учить язык, я всегда говорю, что я играл в видеоигры и читал книги. Когда я учился в университете, я выбрал жанр RPG или role-playing games (ролевые игры). Я играл в Morrowind и Oblivion с очень плохим переводом (картинка в поддержку). Жанр, в котором сотни часов диалогов, где приходится выбирать себе доспехи, оружие, «крафтить» (от англ. «to

👍6943

24 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC≈7,810 views141 reactions2 Starsread 24 August 2026

Первую часть вы налайкали так быстро, что продолжение делаем сразу. Разбираем сцену в самолёте: наконец-то слышно, как говорят сами девчонки. И там сплошь живые современные выражения, которые реально встретишь в соцсетях. 📺 Смотреть в YouTube 🔵 Смотреть в VK 👉 Все ссылки тут https://votetoang.com/ivan

107👍30💩3💘1

20 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTC≈10,400 views242 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Photo

Только осторожно, горячее содержимое, на ночь не уверен стоит ли. Слишком горячий молодой Том Круз, да и атмосфера интервью раскаленная. 🔥Смотреть в YouTube

151🔥61👍23❤‍🔥4🥰3

20 Jul 2026, 21:01 UTC≈9,620 views181 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Спишь? Сейчас выпуск залить или уже днем?

😁116👍3520🔥6❤‍🔥3💔1

18 Jul 2026, 17:35 UTC≈10,600 views135 reactionsread 24 August 2026

Новый выпуск панды тут! 🤍Ждем в группы пн/пт 19:30 А1 вт/чт 19:00 A2 вт/чт 19:00 A2 вт/чт 20:00 B2 👉Вот тут цены и записаться можно Методист сказала, что я написал слишком коротко и никто не поймет о чем речь. Сверху приглашение позаниматься в нашей школе "ВОТ ЭТО английский", лучшие цены, лучшие преподы, очень ждем. @voteto_online - вот тут прямо в личку админу можно написать. (Алена, теперь ок? :D )

99🔥23😁5🍾4👍4

18 Jul 2026, 15:54 UTC≈8,830 views289 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @votetodiaryPhoto

Осторожно: ложные друзья переводчика! 👀 В английском есть слова, которые выглядят очень знакомо. Кажется, что перевод очевиден... Но именно они чаще всего становятся причиной ошибок. 🔹 actually — не «актуально», а «на самом деле», «вообще-то». Actually, I don't agree.→ Вообще-то я не согласен. 👉 «Актуально» — relevant. 🔹 artist — не «артист», а художник. He is a street artist.→ Он уличный художник. 👉 «Артист» — ac

172👍78🔥33🍓2😁2🕊1😭1

16 Jul 2026, 11:17 UTC≈7,400 views114 reactionsread 24 August 2026
Forwarded from @votetodiaryVideo

Пост сделала наша преподавательница Анна А.🔥 Спросить у нашего админа как попасть на урок к Анне тут: @voteto_online

72🔥26👍13❤‍🔥2🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @votetoang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 297,171 of 1,585,381entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КЛУБ | ENGLISH GALAXY | АНГЛИЙСКИЙ ЯЗЫК ПО ПЛЕЙЛИСТАМ
@englishgalaxy_school · 74,915
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ВОТ ЭТО английский” (@votetoang), 23,955 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/votetoang.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.