Канал для тех кто хочет развивать свой блог и органически расти в соцсетях.
*В материалах канала упоминается
Instagram — организация Meta признана экстремистской и запрещена в РФ
Связь: https://t.me/dainovi4
В реестре РКН: https://clck.ru/3LWQmU
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
9 measurements spanning 6 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 45,868–45,917 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 01:29
45,874
-37
12 Aug 2026, 22:07
45,911
+6
11 Aug 2026, 23:02
45,905
+17
10 Aug 2026, 23:13
45,888
-15
10 Aug 2026, 00:30
45,903
+19
9 Aug 2026, 02:30
45,884
+10
8 Aug 2026, 00:47
45,874
-14
7 Aug 2026, 14:00
45,888
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:55
45,888
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.17%
avg views ÷ 45,874 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,830
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.24%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
19 (16 July 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
53,754
Reactions total
666
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
819
Videos
322
Links
612
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
23m 45s
Average length
3m 24s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
666 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
316
47.4%
👍
185
27.8%
🔥
121
18.2%
🙏
18
2.70%
👏
6
0.901%
🤝
6
0.901%
🥰
5
0.751%
❤🔥
4
0.601%
😍
3
0.45%
😇
1
0.15%
😘
1
0.15%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 666reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
11
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 19 we hold a reading for · 53%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vnuk_m. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Делаем клип в нейросети под любую песню
😮 Никто бы не подумал, когда еще в 2024 году нейросети не могли нарисовать у человека 5 пальцев на руке, что в 2026 они научаться делать полноценные клипы под музыку. Нашел сервис, который помогает это сделать без лишней мороки.🟧
Ведь с помощью него достаточно теперь не нужны навыки убойного монтажа . Я сам особо не верил, пока не протестировал.
Краткий гайд
1️⃣ заходим на К…
🔻ПОСЛЕДНИЙ ДЕНЬ, КОГДА МОЖНО ЗАЙТИ В КЛУБ ПО РАЗВИТИЮ БЛОГА И МОНТАЖУ РОЛИКОВ СО СКИДКОЙ ЗА 990₽
Эта цена актуальна только для 6 самых быстрых участников. Дальше стоимость будет расти и дойдет до 1490₽ в месяц.
Сейчас твой шанс зайти по минимальной цене 990₽ и зафиксировать ее за собой
Если ты хочешь:
🟠 привлекать от 5 тыс. целевых подписчиков каждый месяц;
🟠 выйти на стабильный доход 200+ тыс. руб. с блога;
🟠 пе…
📥ПОДКАСТ НА ТЕМУ:
«Блогинг - это ад, о котором молчат: почему успешные блогеры уходят в депрессию?»
Мы привыкли видеть красивую картинку: взлеты, миллионные охваты, солд-ауты. Но за примерами Саши Панкратовой или Оксаны Мыйновой скрывается жесткая изнанка.
🙂Пока «инфоцыгане» продают сказку о легком богатстве, честные эксперты сгорают дотла. Потому что настоящий блогинг - это не талант забить мяч с центра поля, а ми…
YouTube начнет бороться с низкокачественным ИИ контентом
Платформа усиливает борьбу с низкокачественными роликами, массово созданными с помощью ИИ. При этом YouTube не собирается просто удалять такой контент. Вместо этого сервис ограничит возможность зарабатывать на нём.
Под новые ограничения могут попасть сразу несколько типов видео:
➡️ бесконечные шаблонные ролики, которые отличаются друг от друга лишь деталями;
…
Почему я так считаю!
Родных, друзей и вообще всех близких нужно просить не трогать ваш контент лайками и комментариями, потому что толку от этого ноль, а вреда полно.
Они не поднимают охваты, а наоборот роняют их.
Хотели как лучше, а получилось наоборот.
😀Почему так происходит
Алгоритму важен не сам автор, а релевантная аудитория, то есть люди, которым реально интересна тема ролика. Система обучается именно на них и…
🔴ЗАПИСЬ В КЛУБ ПО РАБОТЕ С НЕЙРОСЕТЯМИ
Я создал группу по работе с нейросетями. Она подойдет как и для тех, кто не разбирается в ИИ, но очень хотел бы, так и для продвинутых пользователей.🙂
🔴ОПЛАТА РАЗОВАЯ. ДОСТУП ПРЕДОСТАВЛЯЕТСЯ НАВСЕГДА
Что внутри?
Информации так много, что все и не перечислить. Перечислю самое основное:
🟧более 30-ти уроков по работе с нейросетями
🟧500+ готовых промтов для ваших фотосессий, ра…
Создаем фильм с помощью нейросети
✔️Внучата, делюсь с вами интересной находкой для создания ИИ фильмов.
Кто хоть раз пытался сделать ролик с сюжетом, тот знает главную боль: отдельно пишешь сценарий, потом генерируешь персонажей, переносишь всё между разными сервисами, генерируешь видео… а потом герой вообще на себя не похож в разных сценах. Добавим к этому кривую раскадровку и на выходе получим зря потраченное вр…
📥Ребята, очень многие просили показать урок как настраивать воронку в Инстаграм.
Да это тот самый пошаговый урок, в котором рассказывается как выдавать полезные материалы по кодовому слову.
Вытянул его из КЛУБА и угощаю.
📎А вот сайт для создания воронки
🔻ПОСЛЕДНИЙ ДЕНЬ, КОГДА МОЖНО ЗАЙТИ В КЛУБ ПО РАЗВИТИЮ БЛОГА И МОНТАЖУ РОЛИКОВ СО СКИДКОЙ ЗА 990₽
Эта цена актуальна только для 6 самых быстрых участников. Дальше стоимость будет расти и дойдет до 1490₽ в месяц.
Сейчас твой шанс зайти по минимальной цене и зафиксировать ее за собой:
🟠всего за 990₽ в месяц
Если ты хочешь:
🟠 привлекать от 5 тыс. целевых подписчиков каждый месяц;
🟠 выйти на стабильный доход 200+ тыс…
📥Как выкладывать ролики в ТикТок из России
📌Для айфонов
1) В настройках телефона меняем регион на Беларусь.
2) Включаем любой ВПН.
3) Скачиваем и открываем официальное приложение ТикТок,
❗️ Если видосы все еще не загружаются, надо полностью убрать из трея приложение (завершить его работу) и заново его открыть.
Если и это не помогло, то в 99% случаев проблема в ВПН, я работаю на Дяде Ване и все отлично загружается.
…
❗️Я создал новый аккаунт и за три недели набрал больше 2.300 подписчиков
В данном уроке, на своем примере, показываю все рабочие инструменты по набору подписчиков для аккаунтов созданных с нуля.
Эта стратегия применима к абсолютно любой нише.
😀🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥😀 (ЖАТЬ СЮДА)
🙂А если хочешь развивать свой блог и зарабатывать на этом - приглашаю в клуб. ❤️
😀Посмотреть отзывы
😀Информация о клубе
😀Достижения ребят
😀Вступить
❤26🔥17👍7👏3🙏2😍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @vnuk_m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@vnuk_m edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 813,557 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Внук Маркетолога” (@vnuk_m), 45,874 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vnuk_m.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.