Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SEO Продажи на YouTube

@seoslot

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

796subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001325144005
TypeChannel
Username@seoslot
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/seoslot

Growth

7967987976 August 2026 — 798 subscribers7 August 2026 — 798 subscribers14 August 2026 — 796 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 796–798 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 10:16796-2
7 Aug 2026, 04:51798no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:46798first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 796 subscribers
Avg views / post
112
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 April 20263 August 2026)
Views total336
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

145 reactions across 19 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8155.9%
3222.1%
👍3121.4%
🤩10.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 145reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seoslot. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 April 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 10:12 UTC89 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

👉 Один из 5 железобетонных факторов, который сигнализирует, что канал скоро свалится в штопор и получит Теневой БАН!👤 Эта беда приходит на ваш Ютуб канал не сразу и не по злому умыслу страшных алгоритмов, которые хотят вам навредить. Это вполне понятный и предсказуемый процесс После анализа более сотни Ютуб каналов я заметил целый ряд факторов, которые вам сигнализируют: 👋 Эй, дружище, ОБРАТИ на меня внимание! Я

🔥7

29 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTC160 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вывожу из запоя, снимаю порчу с Ютуба и Теневой БАН! )) Прошло 1.5 месяца, Теневой БАН снят, 3. Продвинутые функции снова включены, охваты опять вернулись. Это, что касается того экспериментального канала, про который я тут писал. Так же благополучно вышли из Теневого бана ещё 2 клиентских канала, пробили свои потолки и тоже пошли набирать просмотры. ВСЕГДА в любой непонятной ситуации, связанной с падением просмотро

5🔥1

13 Jul 2026, 11:42 UTC217 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Уверен, что 99% ютуберов не знают о существовании этого фактора! Это не что иное, как математическая формула Ютуба! Заметить такие «шапки» можно не на каждом канале. С момента выкладки ролика, до момента спада активности аудитории проходит ровно 28 дней! Везде, у всех, всегда – это уже доказанный математический Факт. Но только это не фактические просмотры, а Активная аудитория канала, которая потенциально может посмо

🔥42👍1

6 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC233 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

За прошлую неделю уже провел несколько аналитик из списка новых услуг для Ютуб каналов – анализ эффективных Шорт роликов клиента в сравнении с роликами конкурентов. Надо отметить, что МПВ (Метод Пристального Взгляда), которым пользуются большинство экспертов, здесь не применялся! 😎 Только годами проверенные и рабочие инструменты: Лестница Ханта, психология влияния Роберта Чалдини, техника вирусных триггеров (Curiosit

🔥3👍2

25 Jun 2026, 12:45 UTC234 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Типичная история, в которую попадают 99% ютуберов! 20 мая я публиковал пост, как на тестовом канале поймал теневой бан, и не просто теневой бан, а ещё и с явным оповещением от Ютуба. Из необычного, что связывает эти два события – канал зарегистрировал не в России и симка тоже не российская. Подозреваю, что на почту именно российским каналам такие оповещения не приходят (см пост от 20 мая). Так вот, вчера я на этом к

🔥52

15 Jun 2026, 19:35 UTC261 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Раскачивать Ютуб канал с подкастами - не самое благодарное занятие. Слишком много переменных, которые влияют на конечный результат. Тут как ходить по минному полю, чуть пошел не туда и приплыли. Но благодаря скилам нашей крутой команды теперь и эта тема для меня не кажется такой уж сложной. Менее чем за 3 месяца – мы уже набрали 2 млн просмотров на роликах и 1000 Подписчиков на канале! Если в обычной тематике ты оче

🔥32

11 Jun 2026, 11:29 UTC261 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

SEO Запрос [гостья из будущего]. Ролик опубликован 5 дней назад – стоит метка НОВИНКА. В заголовке видео нет точной SEO фразы, в описании её тоже нет. Ссылка из поиска ведет не на начало видео, а сразу на тот фрагмент ролика, где есть LSI-факторы, связанные с запросом. Ютуб идёт семимильными шагами по пути внедрения комбинированных SEO фишек, от чего SEO продвижение под Ютуб становится всё более и более интересным.

👍6

8 Jun 2026, 12:57 UTC257 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Провели эфир с Мишей Шакиным о SEO продажах на Ютубе. Базовую методологию выдал в максимально сжатом виде и самым простым языком, без аналитики, цифр и духоты. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orNar271s5I

👍5🔥4

29 May 2026, 13:09 UTC329 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Настройка Ютуба под Продажи, а не под лайки, просмотры и подписчиков, приводит порой к таким вот неожиданным контактам, которые легко могут перейти в разряд твоих заказчиков. Клиент "Николаевы Печи", с которым работаем с ноября 2025 года по методике "SEO продаж на YouTube", встретился на днях с Алексеем Щербаковым по поводу его бани и банной печи. Если кто не в курсе творчества Алексея, то у него на Ютубе есть свой п

🔥95

20 May 2026, 17:33 UTC292 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Если не соблюдать этот баланс, то всё может закончится для вас так же печально! Дословно перевод звучит так: Чтобы обеспечить безопасность нашего сообщества, мы ограничиваем доступ к некоторым из наших наиболее мощных функций каналам, которые создали и поддерживают положительную историю канала или предоставили подтверждение. На данный момент у вашего канала недостаточно истории канала. Он потерял доступ к расширенн

👍4🔥3

15 May 2026, 12:26 UTC272 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

- Мой новый ролик совсем не набирает просмотры, что делать? Этот частенько бывает на Ютубе, особенно с коротким контентом - Shorts видео. В таком случае я обычно скрываю старый ролик в Ограниченный доступ (не Доступ по ссылке) и перевыкладываю видео заново с небольшими изменениями в Заголовке и описании с тегами. Иногда бывает важно попасть в "коридор активности" вашей аудитории и выкладывать контент за 6-9 часов д

🔥4👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @seoslot. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,198,853 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SEO Продажи на YouTube” (@seoslot), 796 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seoslot.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.