Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for креатéя | софи фид

Channel

креатéя | софи фид

@sofiiifed

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,014subscribers

-75 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001891562697
TypeChannel
Username@sofiiifed
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sofiiifed

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,0144,0894,051.57 August 2026 — 4,089 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,089 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,085 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,080 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,077 subscribers21 August 2026 — 4,067 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,059 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,053 subscribers30 August 2026 — 4,051 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,041 subscribers7 September 2026 — 4,028 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,019 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,014 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 38 days, net -75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,003–4,100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 09:424,014-5
12 Sept 2026, 02:204,019-9
7 Sept 2026, 23:584,028-13
2 Sept 2026, 18:354,041-10
30 Aug 2026, 18:154,051-2
27 Aug 2026, 17:394,053-6
25 Aug 2026, 02:344,059-8
21 Aug 2026, 09:574,067-10
18 Aug 2026, 09:244,077-3
15 Aug 2026, 19:464,080-5
12 Aug 2026, 00:244,085-4
7 Aug 2026, 23:454,089no change
7 Aug 2026, 23:364,089first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 10 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

203 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5326.1%
❤‍🔥5125.1%
4522.2%
custom 52355454242190879723316.3%
😍83.94%
😱73.45%
👏62.96%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 21 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sofiiifed. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 May 2026 to 21 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Jun 2026, 09:55 UTC526 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

сууупер прием 👏🏻 музыкантам очень надо такое в рилс 🎬chameleon.wav

🔥9😍6❤‍🔥41

17 Jun 2026, 17:16 UTC636 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

организуем тут сокровищницу креатéя

  1. дааа, очень надо93%
  2. нет, бесполезная затея…7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

17 Jun 2026, 17:15 UTC606 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

это я в первые 30 секунд как рекомендации открыла — уже нашла сокровище продолжать делиться с вами классными визуальными решениями/находками?

7❤‍🔥3custom 52355454242190879723👏2

17 Jun 2026, 17:11 UTC492 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

вот этот пример снят уже не со штатива, постоянно меняются ракурсы, снято «примерно» — и вот это уже не вайб, видите 🎬lakewoodchurch

❤‍🔥54🔥3custom 52355454242190879722

17 Jun 2026, 17:05 UTC446 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

достаточно просто установить камеру на штатив и снять кадры до/после = креативно показываем масштаб мероприятия 🔥 🎬fo_ordabasy

5❤‍🔥4🔥4custom 52355454242190879722

3 Jun 2026, 14:02 UTC573 views21 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

очень свежо, не заезжено 🎬wolfacejoeyy

🔥8😱7❤‍🔥3😍2custom 52355454242190879721

25 May 2026, 12:43 UTC725 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

эта мадам каждый раз напоминает мне о дикой любви к креативному монтажу 🎬taoagou

🔥13❤‍🔥86custom 52355454242190879725

22 May 2026, 17:44 UTC606 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

когда собирали мастер-группу upgréat, я ещё раз заметила важную вещь. почти у всех анкеты были вообще не про навыки. не «не умею монтировать» не «не умею снимать» а: «не понимаю, как показать себя» «не знаю, о чём говорить» «не понимаю, как выделиться» «не хватает уверенности» «нет стабильности» и я поймала себя на мысли, что очень часто проблема вообще не в том, что человек мало умеет. потому что можно уметь с

4🔥3custom 52355454242190879721

21 May 2026, 17:53 UTC439 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

5❤‍🔥5👏4custom 52355454242190879721

21 May 2026, 17:53 UTC468 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

не могу не поделиться!!!🎬 сегодня в академии theCreathéa стартовала мастер-группа — впервые у нас такой формат, где мы будем очень близко работать с каждый учеником ближайшие два месяца. у меня есть традиция — для каждого обучения я записываю открывающий подкаст. и каждый раз происходит одно и то же: пока записываю, сижу вся в мурашках и чуть ли не плачу 😭 не знаю почему, но в этот момент всегда чувствуется начало

6❤‍🔥5custom 52355454242190879725

19 May 2026, 12:48 UTC454 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

почему одни видеомейкеры постоянно работают с крутыми брендами и стоят в очереди из клиентов, а другие перебиваются случайными заказами? 🤔 дело в том, что большинство монтажеров полностью зависят от сарафанного радио. НО оно абсолютно неуправляемо, и из-за него вы вечно живете в изматывающем режиме «то пусто, то густо» и в постоянной тревоге 🤯 чтобы крупные клиенты находили вас сами и платили достойно, нужно закры

❤‍🔥9🔥6custom 52355454242190879724

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sofiiifed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Jun 2026, 17:16 UTCAnonymous Poll41 voters

организуем тут сокровищницу креатéя

  1. дааа, очень надо93%
  2. нет, бесполезная затея…7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 10 May 2026 to 21 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Киселёва тут | AI • режиссура • портфолио
@kiselevatut · 23,096
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
Немонтаж | (Movlat Dadaew)
@nmntzh · 25,833
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 13 September 2026
Кирилл Артамонов
@artamonov_proreels · 25,178
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 September 2026
Панкратова покоряет США
@pankratova916 · 22,632
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
Арина Алекс. REELS и продажи
@ArinaAlexx · 115,847
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 August 2026
Канал интенсивов от Ронина
@artemronin · 32,452
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“креатéя | софи фид” (@sofiiifed), 4,014 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sofiiifed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.