Video message, posted without a caption
❤11🔥8😍6👍5👀1

Channel
@t_crew
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
43,385subscribers
+1,472 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001269722631 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @t_crew |
| Description | Рассказываем про ИТ-команду Т-Банка и делимся актуальными вакансиями в проекты и команды по всей России. Все ИТ-вакансии: https://t.tb.ru/vacancies_all Канал о технологиях: t.me/kod_zheltyi Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://l.tbank.ru/knd_crew_tg |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/t_crew |
Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 43,385 | +85 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 43,300 | +20 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:58 | 43,280 | +116 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 43,164 | +13 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:57 | 43,151 | +50 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 43,101 | +148 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 42,953 | +129 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 08:57 | 42,824 | +85 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:52 | 42,739 | +29 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 42,710 | +57 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:33 | 42,653 | +39 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:34 | 42,614 | +21 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 42,593 | +15 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 42,578 | +18 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 42,560 | +40 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:24 | 42,520 | +20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 21:25 | 42,500 | +6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 42,494 | +17 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 42,477 | +20 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:36 | 42,457 | first reading |
43 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 43 (24 July 2026 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 81,200 |
| Reactions total | 1,195 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Sept 2026, 23:42 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,172 reactions across 42 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 737 | 33.9% | |
| ❤ | 446 | 20.5% | |
| custom 5413408339298117601 | 304 | 14.0% | |
| 😍 | 241 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5413874381904442314 | 139 | 6.40% | |
| 👀 | 123 | 5.66% | |
| 🤝 | 46 | 2.12% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 2.07% | |
| 👎 | 24 | 1.10% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 0.967% | |
| 👏 | 17 | 0.783% | |
| 👾 | 16 | 0.737% | |
| 😎 | 6 | 0.276% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 0.138% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 0.092% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.092% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video message, posted without a caption
❤11🔥8😍6👍5👀1
Всем физкульт-привет с Московского марафона! Бежим сегодня и завтра 10 и 42 километра, поддержите лайками нашу Т-Команду: 🤝 — для 100% финиша 💛 — для поддержки ⚡ — для ускорения
🤝23custom 541340833929811760120custom 541387438190444231418❤4👍1
✨ Как разработчику расти в Т-Банке? Спойлер: не обязательно линейно. Иногда рост — это не следующая ступень вверх, а шаг в сторону — в другую команду, продукт или на новую роль. И часто такой шаг дает больше, чем очередное повышение. Так и поступил Максим, ведущий разработчик из Сириуса. Он три года работал фронтендером в Т-Путешествиях, а затем ротировался в команду, которая внедряет агентские системы в процессы р…
❤12😍8custom 54138743819044423144👍1
🏆 Т-Команда на Северном полюсе Недавно мы рассказывали, что добрались до самой северной точки мира. Пришло время поделиться подробностями! Полторы недели на атомном ледоколе, стратегические задачи, белый медведь посреди льдов и юбилейный забег на краю света — это история про то, как идти дальше привычного, бросать себе вызов и возвращаться с новым опытом. В карточках показываем, как это было → #т_команда
😍27custom 541340833929811760121❤15custom 54138743819044423145🥰2
Posted without readable text
custom 54134083392981176015custom 54138743819044423144🔥3👎2❤1
Posted without readable text
🔥29❤14🤝8👀4👎3
Posted without readable text
🔥118❤113👀29custom 54134083392981176014👨💻2
☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️ Ищем риск-аналитика в команду портфельного менеджмента Т-Лизинга. Они строят стратегии принятия решений, анализируют доходность и риски сегментов, запускают продуктовые тесты. В задачах — развивать финансовые NPV- и LTV-модели, рассчитывать метрики доходности продукта, проводить сегментный анализ портфеля, находить зоны роста и рассчитывать стресс-сценарии развития продукта. Ждем того, кто уверенно …
❤6🔥5👀4custom 54134083392981176013custom 54138743819044423142🤝1
Откройте, чтобы ускорить карьеру в бигтехе ⬇️ 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆 ⛈⛈⛈ Забирайте свой шанс попасть в программу «Мини-СЕО», где вы сможете: ➡ развивать проекты крупной компании; ➡ работать под руководством топ-менеджера Т-Банка; ➡ увидеть, как ваше решение работает в продукте; ➡ получить знания и опыт, которые невозможно нагуглить. Не боитесь крутых поворотов и готовы побороться за главны…
🔥10custom 54138743819044423149❤6👎3custom 54134083392981176012👍1
✨ Есть такая профессия — писать код и создавать приложения для миллионов пользователей Ко Дню разработчика попросили наших технических директоров заполнить короткие анкеты, чтобы познакомиться с ними поближе. И заодно собрали их советы для тех, кто только начинает свой путь в ИТ. Ищите ответы в карточках и читайте истории, как они развивали технологии, в «Коде Желтом». Ставьте 💛, чтобы поздравить коллег-разработчик…
custom 541340833929811760118custom 54138743819044423149❤8👀3👍3👎2🔥1
😇 Команда, которая превращает проблемы в решения Леша пришел в Т-Банк в 2017 году, когда офис в Нижнем Новгороде только открывался, а в списке сотрудников было двенадцать человек. Начинал как Python-разработчик, но быстро понял, что хочет не только заниматься разработкой, но и влиять на продукт. Сегодня он руководит командой DnD, которая работает над сервисом «Платформа Проблемы». Это система, которая собирает полн…
🔥16❤9🤝2😁2custom 54134083392981176011custom 54138743819044423141
✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️✍️ Ищем UX-редактора, который будет прорабатывать логику и тексты интерфейсов в приложении Т-Банка. В фокусе — сценарии использования, UX-тексты (онбординги, кнопки, алерты), исследования и метрики. Ждем того, кто готов работать в связке с дизайном и продуктом, развивать культуру интерфейсных текстов и продуктовый подход в команде. 👉 Откликайтесь по ссылке, если у вас есть опыт работы от 6 месяцев. #вак…
🔥10custom 54138743819044423145💔3custom 54134083392981176012❤1🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @t_crew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
После этого задача встала на один рабочий день. Как думаете, почему?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“T-Crew” (@t_crew), 43,385 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/t_crew.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.