Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bankova Mail

Channel

Bankova Mail

@bankovamail

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20,732subscribers

-850 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002193553709
TypeChannel
Username@bankovamail
Created30 September 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/bankovamail

Growth

20,35521,70621,030.56 August 2026 — 21,582 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,582 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,586 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,592 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,584 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,560 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,433 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,696 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,705 subscribers13 August 2026 — 21,706 subscribers15 August 2026 — 21,417 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,355 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,732 subscribers20,7326 August 202617 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 12 days, net -850. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,152–21,909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 18:3520,732+377
16 Aug 2026, 14:4520,355-1,062
15 Aug 2026, 01:0421,417-289
13 Aug 2026, 14:3821,706+1
12 Aug 2026, 11:1821,705+9
11 Aug 2026, 09:0521,696+263
10 Aug 2026, 05:5321,433-127
9 Aug 2026, 05:0221,560-24
8 Aug 2026, 07:1521,584-8
7 Aug 2026, 10:3121,592+6
6 Aug 2026, 07:1021,586+4
6 Aug 2026, 02:0521,582no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:0721,582first reading

Engagement

301 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.9%
avg views ÷ 20,732 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,080
301 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.897%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
301
of 301 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 300 of 301 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held301 (5 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total927,911
Reactions total8,319
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 57s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,705 reactions across 282 posts, in 58 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡1,49219.4%
🤬92912.1%
😁6198.03%
5617.28%
🤮5326.90%
👍5156.68%
🤣4716.11%
💩4275.54%
💯3364.36%
🔥3043.95%
🤔2763.58%
👏1562.02%
🖕1351.75%
🫡1061.38%
🥰1041.35%
😱991.28%
🙏760.986%
🥱760.986%
🤯740.96%
😢730.947%
38 further kinds3444.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 300 of the 301 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,319reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 301 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 301 we hold a reading for · 1.0%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @bankovamail. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 301 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC534 views1 reactionsread 17 August 2026

👀Вагіф Алієв хотів збудувати ТРЦ на Почайній, але переглядає плани через те, що внаслідок російських кранів книжковий ринок повністю згорів — УП Mandarin Plaza Group Вагіфа Алієва ще у 2020 році придбали ТОВ «Книжковий ринок» у ексміністра-колаборантів Дмитра Табачника та його брата. На цій ділянці компанія планувала збудувати ТРЦ після війни, але зараз переглядає ці плани. Зараз це вже дуже туманно, на жаль. Зроби

😭1

17 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC≈1,880 views5 reactionsread 17 August 2026

За це він відсидів 4,5 роки в СІЗО, порішав і вийшов на волю. Рівно стільки присудив Печерський районний суд міста Києва, хоча за таке діяння судова практика передбачає максимальне покарання – 8 років, стільки ж просила прокуратура, але суддя дала майже мінімальне покарання, в той же час «за дивним збігом обставин» у судді значно покращились житлові умови. З мамою вбитої дитини Островський теж порішав, вона в суді вз

🤬31🥰1

17 Aug 2026, 14:57 UTC≈2,060 views5 reactionsread 17 August 2026

⚖️📲 Етична рада допустила пов'язаного з Жернаковим Кучерявенка до співбесіди у ВРП через місяць після негативного висновку про доброчесність — у суді тим часом спливло його листування зі Стефанішиною про конкурс НАБУ 🏛⚖️Етична рада допустила Миколу Кучерявенка до співбесіди на члена ВРП за квотою Ради, хоча 14 липня в іншому конкурсі сама ж визнала його таким, що не відповідає критеріям професійної етики та доброчес

🤬21💩1😁1

17 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC≈2,370 views10 reactionsread 17 August 2026

На сьогодні є інформація, що голосів під нового голову СБУ з прізвищем Поклад у парламенті поки немає. Утім, як немає в нас і можливості згадати хоча б один випадок, коли Рада не проголосувала за кандидатуру голови СБУ, внесену президентом. Попри те, що, за нашою інформацією, уламки ОПЗЖ усерйоз заявляють голові ОП Кирилу Буданову, що за Поклада не голосуватимуть (чому це важливо для Буданова, ми теж уже писали), ті

😁4💩3💯1🥰1😈1

17 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC≈2,530 views3 reactionsread 17 August 2026

📺📡«Київстар» отримав доступ до GPON-мережі «Укртелекому»: оператор зможе продавати свою цифрову екосистему через чужу оптику, а мультисервісний абонент приносить йому на 37% більше 🌐🤝«Київстар» і «Укртелеком» сьогодні домовилися взаємно використовувати оптичні мережі: перший продаватиме «Домашній інтернет» і власні цифрові сервіси через енергонезалежну GPON-мережу конкурента, другий — «Оптичний інтернет» через інфра

2🤔1

17 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈2,560 views17 reactionsread 17 August 2026

💬Визначив готувати кадрові рішення, які запропонував Головнокомандувач — Зеленський Підписуйтесь: Bankova Mail Підписуйтесь на нас в Х Головне на сайті

6😁6🤡4💩1

17 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC≈2,690 views27 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

👀Піарники Ахметова продовжують більше виводити його «в люди» і показали олігарха за кермом Підписуйтесь: Bankova Mail Підписуйтесь на нас в Х Головне на сайті

💩18🤡5🤣21🤮1

17 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC≈2,800 views19 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Умєров давно вже посол із дуже особливих доручень президента України. Зокрема фінансових. Багато хто, до речі, забув, як він заходив у велику політику. А не варто. І тут не стільки про якість політичного «Голосу» (Умєров був у списку партії Святослава Вакарчука), скільки про вміння входити в усі двері без додаткових пристосувань. В історії конфлікту Зеленського з Ахметовим (а також Шустером, Гордоном та Аваковим) Умє

🤡7🤬52💯2💩1🤮1🥰1

17 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC≈1,670 views16 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

📹Відео моменту ДТП біля палацу «Україна» за участі «смотрящего» за Лукʼяеівським СІЗО Островським Іншим учасником аварії є директор департаменту розвитку футболу УАФ Богдан Городнюк. За попередніми даними, на місці ДТП драгер показав, що Островський був тверезий. Городнюк отримав ушкодження, ним опікуються лікарі. 📌Зазначимо, що Островський вже не вперше потрапляє у резонансні ДТП. У 2018 році він збив на смерть ді

🤬131🤡1🥰1

17 Aug 2026, 12:58 UTC≈2,790 views14 reactionsread 17 August 2026

👀✍️Криптобіржа Binance передає дані користувачів РФ - Reuters Зокрема, ІТ-фахівець Юрій Бєлєнький, був затриманий в РФ за донати у крипті українським військовим. Цю інформацію російська влада отримала саме від Binance. Підписуйтесь: Bankova Mail Підписуйтесь на нас в Х Головне на сайті

🤬10🤡4

17 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC≈2,800 views11 reactionsread 17 August 2026

✅Кабмін схвалив програму уряду, документ передано у Верховну Раду — Корецький Підписуйтесь: Bankova Mail Підписуйтесь на нас в Х Головне на сайті

🤬43🤡2👌1💅1

17 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC≈2,940 views19 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

⚖️Невістка скандальної очільниці МСЕК Крупи сяде на лаву підсудних за недостовірне декларування За даними правоохоронців, ексочільницю управління Мін'юсту на Хмельниччині Катерина Крупа, яка є невісткою колишньої керівниці Хмельницької МСЕК Тетяни Крупи, не задекларувала майже 20 млн грн. У щорічній декларації за 2023 рік ексчиновниця не вказала рахунок і кошти на ньому в одному з банків Австрії. Там зберігалися 54

👏9👍4😁4👌1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 301 posts we hold for @bankovamail. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 23,425 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bankova Mail” (@bankovamail), 20,732 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bankovamail.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.