Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +16,589. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 77,176โ98,741 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:58
96,253
+503
16 Sept 2026, 08:19
95,750
+2,306
14 Sept 2026, 13:58
93,444
+1,161
13 Sept 2026, 00:22
92,283
+2,684
11 Sept 2026, 02:00
89,599
+439
8 Sept 2026, 05:40
89,160
+1,888
4 Sept 2026, 22:00
87,272
+7
3 Sept 2026, 09:05
87,265
+76
2 Sept 2026, 00:48
87,189
+420
31 Aug 2026, 23:48
86,769
+491
30 Aug 2026, 22:57
86,278
+438
29 Aug 2026, 20:23
85,840
+931
28 Aug 2026, 20:28
84,909
+1,004
27 Aug 2026, 19:13
83,905
-113
26 Aug 2026, 19:56
84,018
-161
25 Aug 2026, 21:09
84,179
-140
25 Aug 2026, 00:04
84,319
-318
23 Aug 2026, 12:23
84,637
+167
22 Aug 2026, 02:18
84,470
+687
20 Aug 2026, 17:25
83,783
first reading
Engagement
1,619 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 123 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR ยท 30 days
1.20%
avg views รท 96,253 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,150
1,039 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.653%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
1,039
of 1,619 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 971 of 1,039 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
1,619 (7 August 2026 โ 22 September 2026)
Views total
1,195,107
Reactions total
7,497
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 17:49 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
โ31,300
Videos
โ4,010
Links
โ2,230
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 22 September 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 22s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
Reaction mix
7,092 reactions across 933 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
4,057
57.2%
๐ฏ
617
8.70%
๐ฅฐ
612
8.63%
๐
516
7.28%
๐
290
4.09%
๐ฅ
243
3.43%
๐คฉ
119
1.68%
โคโ๐ฅ
102
1.44%
๐พ
95
1.34%
๐คฏ
95
1.34%
๐
82
1.16%
๐ซก
66
0.931%
โก
55
0.776%
๐
30
0.423%
๐
27
0.381%
๐
21
0.296%
๐
16
0.226%
๐
13
0.183%
๐ฑ
12
0.169%
๐ค
9
0.127%
2 further kinds
15
0.212%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 933 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 7,092 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
12
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 1,000 we hold a reading for ยท 0.4%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @uzxvsvgsdsy1999. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Tuesday 22/09/2026
Free single
18:15 Muaither ๐ Al Khor
Total odds: 1.44
Bet Responsibly
โค7๐ฏ4
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,619 posts we hold for @uzxvsvgsdsy1999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
Bet_developer @bet_develop ยท 38,474 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here โ alongside 84 others โ read 31 August 2026
๐ NBA GOD | FREE TIPS @NBAGODTips ยท 31,110 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 84 here โ alongside 83 others โ read 7 September 2026
Eagle Predict - Free Football Betting Tips and Predictions @eaglepredict ยท 89,648 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here โ alongside 86 others โ read 29 August 2026
๐ฅ๐๐ข ๐๐๐ซ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐ @RioFixedGame ยท 72,370 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 82 here โ alongside 81 others โ read 14 August 2026
๐ฉ๐ฌ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ต @Betgenofficial ยท 23,639 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 81 here โ alongside 80 others โ read 18 September 2026
๐๐๐๐๐ฉ๐๐๐๐ @NightEdge8062 ยท 42,298 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here โ alongside 83 others โ read 30 August 2026
Green Picks โฝ๏ธ (Free) @greenpicksdaily ยท 58,981 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here โ alongside 81 others โ read 24 August 2026
๐Freak Bets๐ @freakbets ยท 132,376 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here โ alongside 84 others โ read 13 August 2026
Sport Bets Analyst | Bet365 @Sport_Bets_Analyst ยท 23,047 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 69 here โ alongside 68 others โ read 19 September 2026
๐ฆ๐ฃ๐ข๐ฅ๐ง ๐ ๐๐๐๐ โฝ @sportmagi ยท 23,986 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here โ alongside 86 others โ read 17 September 2026
Football Predictions โฝ๏ธ @FPAlerts ยท 43,636 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here โ alongside 83 others โ read 29 August 2026
TejTips @tejtips ยท 30,583 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here โ alongside 77 others โ read 6 September 2026
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ฉ๐ช @masterfootball756 ยท 60,479 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here โ alongside 85 others โ read 23 August 2026
TOTO FREE TIPS โฝ๏ธ @totobetz ยท 39,848 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here โ alongside 81 others โ read 30 August 2026
Accaz @accainsights ยท 80,095 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 82 here โ alongside 81 others โ read 18 August 2026
BestChamp - Sport Analysis @bestchamp_free ยท 107,685 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 77 here โ alongside 76 others โ read 15 August 2026
Predicto Bets | Football Bets & Predictions โฝ๏ธ๐ @predictoggg ยท 59,474 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 79 here โ alongside 78 others โ read 22 August 2026
Goat Picks @goatpicks01 ยท 27,551 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 79 here โ alongside 78 others โ read 11 September 2026
The Doc ๐ฏ @DocBettingg ยท 23,144 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here โ alongside 86 others โ read 19 September 2026
VictorsPredict.com @victorspredict ยท 27,282 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here โ alongside 95 others โ read 11 September 2026
SHARK BETS ๐ฆ @officialsharkbets ยท 30,733 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here โ alongside 85 others โ read 10 September 2026
๐ฆ๐จ๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ง๐ฆ ๐๐ฅ๐๐กA @surebetsarenaa ยท 27,273 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 81 here โ alongside 80 others โ read 11 September 2026
FREE SURE ODDS | KING OF GG SPORT BETS ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฐ @accuratedailytips2022 ยท 72,789 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 75 here โ alongside 74 others โ read 5 September 2026
โฝ Odds Guruu | Football Predictions & Betting Tips @OddsGuruuPredictions ยท 42,697 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here โ alongside 81 others โ read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 106 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โResponsible Betting๐ฐ๐ฅโ (@uzxvsvgsdsy1999), 96,253 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uzxvsvgsdsy1999.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.