VIP PAID MEMBERSHIP TICKET SUCCESSFUL WIN.✅✅✅✅✅ 👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑 (BOTH TEAM TO SCORE) CHANNEL. ✅📢 TICKET INFORMATION,,, @LeonBet22

Channel
Both Team To Score (G/G)
@BothTeamToScoreGG
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,515subscribers
+851 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001649561265 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @BothTeamToScoreGG |
| Description | ✅ winning is my mission. ✅ It's Verified And Deal Is Clean. ✅ Best and Fixed ticket Source. ✅ so verify and go right way. https://t.me/+5DtyPfevPJIwMjNl |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 59 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/BothTeamToScoreGG |
Topic
Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 01:08 | 16,515 | +20 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 17:11 | 16,495 | -7 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:45 | 16,502 | +8 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:55 | 16,494 | -6 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 05:46 | 16,500 | +8 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 04:45 | 16,492 | -6 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 05:41 | 16,498 | +13 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 04:11 | 16,485 | +22 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 01:20 | 16,463 | -14 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 23:36 | 16,477 | +17 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 00:47 | 16,460 | +16 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 03:18 | 16,444 | +10 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 23:10 | 16,434 | +4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:35 | 16,430 | +3 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 00:37 | 16,427 | +17 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 00:55 | 16,410 | -3 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 03:20 | 16,413 | +13 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 19:51 | 16,400 | +3 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 15:16 | 16,397 | +19 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:40 | 16,378 | first reading |
Engagement
322 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 71 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.86%
- avg views ÷ 16,515 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,300
- 73 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.629%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 73
- of 322 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 49 of 73 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 322 (5 August 2026 – 11 November 2026) |
| Views total | 94,795 |
| Reactions total | 434 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈4,470
- Videos
- ≈16
- Links
- ≈62
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 20s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,325 reactions across 235 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,691 | 72.7% | |
| 🔥 | 255 | 11.0% | |
| 👍 | 157 | 6.75% | |
| 👏 | 69 | 2.97% | |
| ❤🔥 | 39 | 1.68% | |
| 🏆 | 33 | 1.42% | |
| 🥰 | 22 | 0.946% | |
| 💯 | 21 | 0.903% | |
| 🤔 | 16 | 0.688% | |
| ⚡ | 12 | 0.516% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 0.215% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 0.172% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 0.043% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 238 of the 322 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,325 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 322 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 4
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 322 we hold a reading for · 1%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @BothTeamToScoreGG. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 322 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 11 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 73 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
1XBET CODE:UMG1L ONLY VIP MEMBERS TICKET🔤 👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑
VIP UPDATE------✉️
🔤🔤🔤🔤➖✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️ #freetips #bet
🏆12❤7💯1🤔1
📳 NOVEMBER PAID VIP REPOR📳 🔆DAILY 1 PRE TICKET 2-9 ODD🔆 👇 NOVEMBER REPORT 👇 ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,............,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 01/11/2026-- 2.81 ODD WIN-- ✅✅ 02/11/2026--3.85 ODD WIN-- ✅✅ 03/11/2026-- 4.08 ODD WIN-- ✅✅ 04/11/2026-- 2.54 ODD WIN-- ✅✅ 05/11/2026-- 2.08 ODD WIN-- ✅✅ 06/11/2026-- 5.33 ODD WIN-- ✅✅ 07/11/2026-- 7.03 ODD WIN-- ✅✅ 08/11/2026-- 2.04 ODD WIN-- ✅✅ 09/11/2026-- 5.70 ODD W…
❤1
VIP PAID MEMBERSHIP TICKET SUCCESSFUL WIN.✅✅✅✅✅ 👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑 (BOTH TEAM TO SCORE) CHANNEL. ✅📢 TICKET INFORMATION,,, @LeonBet22
❤2
1XBET CODE:NKQYJ ONLY VIP MEMBERS TICKET🔤 👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑👑
VIP UPDATE------✉️
DAILY SURE ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ WIN. ✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅✅ JUST STAY LINK & EARN PROFIT.
🔤🔤🔤🔤➖✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️ #freetips #bet
❤11🔥5
🔤🔤🔤🔤➖✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️ #freetips #bet
🔥10❤8🤔2
🔤🔤🔤🔤➖✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️✏️ #freetips #bet
❤7🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 322 posts we hold for @BothTeamToScoreGG. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @BothTeamToScoreGG as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 28 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 7 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 17 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 1
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@BETKINGDOMGGYES777 · 18,774
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 5 October 2026
@GreenPrimeFree · 20,972
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 September 2026
@officialsharkbets · 32,443
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
@weird_pCn_uk · 53,400
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
@surebet015 · 25,497
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
@Jbfootballno1 · 34,966
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
@sportstipslunce05 · 49,488
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
@predictoggg · 58,487
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 August 2026
@royaltips2222 · 57,760
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
@onlineoddshere · 35,208
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
@protipstarr · 41,421
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
@victorspredict · 27,231
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 September 2026
@exactbright100 · 30,232
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 9 September 2026
@Davidinfo2002 · 53,195
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
@bet_develop · 38,776
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 31 August 2026
@somtipps · 68,717
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 23 August 2026
@Gotofreevip · 22,584
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 September 2026
@KaiserElitePick · 22,996
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 September 2026
@shuqaalesports · 3
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 2 September 2026
@loyaltipsoffical · 205,891
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
@stakers009 · 19,755
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 26 September 2026
@vipshadow223 · 130
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 September 2026
@nightwatchersports23 · 38,630
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
@Hubaalsportts · 49,449
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 88 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Both Team To Score (G/G)” (@BothTeamToScoreGG), 16,515 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BothTeamToScoreGG.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.