Tips https://t.me/+oLtzj4cQYOw2NzY1

Channel
Otto's Expert Bet π©π°π©π°
@ottofreeodds
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
15,590subscribers
+254 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001781297546 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ottofreeodds |
| Description | "The expert in anything was once a beginner." If you think a good design is expensive, you should look at the cost of a bad design. Only for vip knock here @helsavip (DON'T KNOCK ME HERE FOR CROSS PROMO OR SHARE) |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ottofreeodds |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:43 | 15,590 | +55 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 15,535 | +39 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:27 | 15,496 | +49 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 15,447 | +28 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:43 | 15,419 | +37 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:42 | 15,382 | +22 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 15,360 | +23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 15,337 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 15,334 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:16 | 15,336 | first reading |
Engagement
148 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 4.48%
- avg views Γ· 15,590 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 698
- 148 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.13%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 148
- of 148 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 77 of 148 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 148 (6 August 2026 β 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 103,302 |
| Reactions total | 667 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 18:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- β7,110
- Videos
- β14
- Links
- β1,160
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 17 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
667 reactions across 73 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 206 | 30.9% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 191 | 28.6% | |
| β€ | 119 | 17.8% | |
| π | 83 | 12.4% | |
| π₯° | 65 | 9.75% | |
| π | 3 | 0.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 148 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 667reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 148 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
π΅π§π’πππ¬- π§π’π§πππ¬ ππ₯ππ ππ¨π¬π¦ Tips:~ Correct-Scoreβ CODE:-https://t.me/+5kITWQ058Mg5ZTNl
FREE TIPS ππ
β€1
MEGAPARI BONUS LINK - https://vipbetlink.megapari-111354.in Promocode - VIPBETLINK MELBET BONUS LINK -https://bit.ly/SILVA75 Promocode - SILVA75
β€βπ₯7π₯5π3β€1
Sticker, posted without a caption
π₯π₯ AUGUST VIP RECORD π₯π₯ DATE---------------ODDS-----WON/LOST 01/08/2026 - 5.4 π’π’ 01/08/2026 - 6.4 π’π’ 02/08/2026 - 5.7 π’π’ 03/08/2026 - 6.1 π’π’ 03/08/2026 - 5.9 βοΈβοΈ 04/08/2026 - 6.2 π’π’ 04/08/2026 - 6.2 π’π’ 05/08/2026 - 6.0 π’π’ 05/08/2026 - 7.0 π’π’ 06/08/2026 - 5.7 β¦
β€5π₯4π₯°2
YESTERDAY'S 2ND VIP WON π’π’ ODDS π 6.6 β β VIP CONTACT π @helsavip
β€βπ₯4π3π₯3β€1
Photo, posted without a caption
YESTERDAY'S 2ND VIP WON π’
1 OUT OF 2 FREE TIPS WON HEREπ’π’
π₯5β€βπ₯4π3
TODAY'S 1ST VIP WON π’π’ ODDS π 5.9 β β VIP CONTACT π @helsavip
π₯5β€βπ₯3π3
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 148 posts we hold for @ottofreeodds. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@footballinsight01 Β· 89,718
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here β alongside 85 others β read 17 August 2026
@sdysteme10 Β· 88,074
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 65 here β alongside 64 others β read 17 August 2026
@BETORG Β· 110,536
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 82 here β alongside 81 others β read 14 August 2026
@Ardaninfo Β· 109,906
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here β alongside 81 others β read 14 August 2026
@solovibe_4TED Β· 111,821
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 72 here β alongside 71 others β read 14 August 2026
@officialphrvatips Β· 144,659
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here β alongside 87 others β read 13 August 2026
@Private_matches Β· 115,313
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here β alongside 84 others β read 14 August 2026
@ALEXINOSS Β· 2,072,145
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 90 here β alongside 89 others β read 12 August 2026
@freakbets Β· 132,274
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 85 here β alongside 84 others β read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βOtto's Expert Bet π©π°π©π°β (@ottofreeodds), 15,590 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ottofreeodds.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.