https://t.me/nonamebettingtips

Channel
π GOATPRO BETTING TIPS π
@goatbettingtipspro
On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry
19,321subscribers
-932 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000β31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001745917456 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @goatbettingtipspro |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/goatbettingtipspro |
Topic
Gambling & betting β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Sept 2026, 04:39 | 19,321 | -69 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 19,390 | -85 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 19,475 | -67 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:06 | 19,542 | -19 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 02:56 | 19,561 | -46 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 02:27 | 19,607 | -36 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:13 | 19,643 | -37 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 19,680 | -33 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 19,713 | -24 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 03:07 | 19,737 | -29 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 19,766 | -24 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 19,790 | -29 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 19,819 | -43 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 19,862 | -73 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:36 | 19,935 | -40 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 19,975 | -13 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 19,988 | -28 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 20,016 | -32 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 20,048 | -39 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 20,087 | first reading |
Engagement
114 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR Β· 30 days
- 0.751%
- avg views Γ· 19,321 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 145
- 92 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.78%
- reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
- Posts in window
- 93
- of 114 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 45 of 92 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 114 (8 August 2026 β 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 13,349 |
| Reactions total | 121 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 01:04 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
150 reactions across 56 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π₯ | 62 | 41.3% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 43 | 28.7% | |
| π | 28 | 18.7% | |
| π | 9 | 6.00% | |
| π | 8 | 5.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 114 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 150 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 114 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
π’ ALL PREDICTIONS ARE NOW LIVE π Todayβs complete selection, along with our detailed analysis, is now available in the app. π Check the latest picks and analysis directly through the app.
β€βπ₯1π1π₯1
π 01/09/2026 PREDICTIONS ARE LIVE! π₯ Todayβs predictions have been published in our application. π² Check the app now and donβt miss todayβs selections! Good luck everyone! π
π1
π₯ FREE TIPS ARE NOW LIVE! π₯ Our latest free tips have been shared. π² Check the app now and donβt miss them! Good luck! πβ½
π1
π₯ Isnβt it time to support us? Our FREE tips keep winning every day. π― Now itβs your turn to support us and grow together! πβ€οΈ
π2
π₯ TODAYβS PREDICTIONS ARE LIVE! π₯ π² All predictions have been uploaded to our app! π― Check todayβs picks now and stay one step ahead. π NONAME β Your Predictions, Our Passion. π Donβt miss todayβs selections!
π1
π£ NONAME FREE 2,000 COINS π 1οΈβ£ Download the app 2οΈβ£ Give us 5 β + leave a 15-word positive review 3οΈβ£ Send a screenshot + registered email to @NoNameBettings π Get 2,000 free coins to unlock paid predictions! π² https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nonametips.app β οΈ One gift per member.
π£π£π£ 21 matches predicted correctly. Another incredible performance from NONAME. Our winning streak continues, and weβre just getting started. Join the winning team and donβt miss the next predictions. πππ
β€βπ₯1π1π₯1
π₯ Weβve been winning day after day! Weβd love to hear from all our members. Please share your honest feedback and experience with Noname in our Telegram channel. Every comment and every bit of support means a lot to us. β€οΈ Together, we keep growing stronger! @NoNameBettings
π1
Anyone who wants to create a personalized ticket with us can contact us directly via Telegram. π© For custom tickets and exclusive predictions, reach out to us now. π
We never upset those who trust us.. π₯π₯π₯
π² Download the Noname app and access all our latest predictions! π₯ All picks are available directly in the app. π Download here: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nonametips.app
Showing the 12 most recent of 114 posts we hold for @goatbettingtipspro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegramβs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseβs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@newlegitpredict Β· 34,645
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 81 here β alongside 80 others β read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramβs list for THAT channel, not this one β see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ GOATPRO BETTING TIPS πβ (@goatbettingtipspro), 19,321 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/goatbettingtipspro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.