๐ Join VIP and get access to all our picks & analysis! ๐ณ VIP Access - Pay securely here ๐ฉ DM โ @NBAGODX
๐2๐1๐ค1

Channel
@NBAGODTips
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Posts edited after publishing ยท Polls ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
31,659subscribers
+3,347 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 31,623โ100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001873619617 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @NBAGODTips |
| Description | ๐ Top 1 ๐NBA Tipster ๐GOD of winning ๐ค โก๏ธGet a ๐VIP - t.pretopay.com/NBAGOD โฌ๏ธAfter payment, you will be automatically added to my private telegram VIP channel with professional tips ๐ #NBA #free #tips #basketball #bets โญOwner - @NBAGODX |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/NBAGODTips |
Gambling & betting โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 31,659 | +549 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 31,110 | +81 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 31,029 | +114 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 15:42 | 30,915 | +92 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:15 | 30,823 | +139 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 30,684 | +43 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 30,641 | +13 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:00 | 30,628 | +27 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:06 | 30,601 | +9 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:23 | 30,592 | -33 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 30,625 | +63 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:44 | 30,562 | +124 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 09:07 | 30,438 | +48 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 30,390 | +26 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:13 | 30,364 | +88 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:52 | 30,276 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 30,292 | -29 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 30,321 | -43 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 30,364 | +139 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 30,225 | first reading |
257 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 80 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 257 (5 August 2026 โ 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 189,161 |
| Reactions total | 1,959 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 01:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 27 September 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
4,470 reactions across 257 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ | 1,684 | 37.7% | |
| โค | 1,171 | 26.2% | |
| ๐ | 493 | 11.0% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 436 | 9.75% | |
| ๐ | 418 | 9.35% | |
| ๐ฅ | 130 | 2.91% | |
| ๐ค | 78 | 1.74% | |
| ๐ซก | 14 | 0.313% | |
| ๐ | 13 | 0.291% | |
| ๐พ | 10 | 0.224% | |
| ๐ | 9 | 0.201% | |
| โก | 6 | 0.134% | |
| โ | 3 | 0.067% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 0.067% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 0.045% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 257 of the 257 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 4,470 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 257 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @NBAGODTips. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 257 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
๐ Join VIP and get access to all our picks & analysis! ๐ณ VIP Access - Pay securely here ๐ฉ DM โ @NBAGODX
๐2๐1๐ค1
๐ NBA GOD VIP Season 2026 ๐ September Performance Report โ Profit: +1846โฌ (+18.46u) ๐ฐ ROI: 23.67% ๐ฏ Success rate: 67.95% (53W / 25L) ๐ผ Current bankroll: 3846โฌ (start 2000โฌ) ๐ต Average stake: 1 unit (100โฌ) โ๏ธ Average odds: 1.828 ๐ Bet Analytix: Click here
๐2๐1๐ฅ1
๐ VIP Recap - 26.09 โ ๐พ Muller to win โ ๐พ Timofeeva to win โ ๐พ Mayot to win 3 Wins โ 0 Losses โ 0 Void ๐
๐2๐1๐ฅ1
โ VIP 3/3 SO FAR TODAY! ๐ฅ
๐5๐ฅ2๐1
๐ฅ24 WINS FROM OUR LAST 31 BETS!๐ฅ Mayot gets the job done in a crazy 3-set battle! ๐พ๐ฅ Pre-match odds were much lower, but live we caught Mayot @3.45! ๐ฐ๐ ๐ 24W - 7L | 77.4% WIN RATE VIP members know where the value is! ๐๐ฅ ๐ More picks available in VIP ๐ณ VIP Access - Pay securely here ๐ฉ DM โ @NBAGODX
๐8โค5๐2๐ฅ1
๐ฏ Value Analysis Harold Mayot comes into this semifinal in excellent form, having reached the final in Rennes last week and now winning three matches in St. Tropez. He has beaten Justin Boulais, Vilius Gaubas and Jesper de Jong in the tournament. Murphy Cassone is also on a strong run, but his quarterfinal against Daniel Masur went to three sets and two tiebreaks before he eventually won 6-7, 7-6, 6-4. Mayot's quartโฆ
๐5โค3๐2๐1
๐ More bets available on VIP group๐ ๐ณ Pay securely here โ๏ธ Or text me to join!๐ โญ๏ธ @NBAGODX
๐6โค1๐1๐ค1
๐พ Mayot to win ๐ฐ Stake: Normal Stake (1u) ๐ Odds: 1.64 โ โ โ ๐ Channel Link - t.me/NBAGODTips ๐ฐ Ticket Link - REGISTER HERE ๐ณ VIP Shop - Pay securely here
๐6โค3๐2
๐ Join VIP and get access to all our picks & analysis! ๐ณ VIP Access - Pay securely here ๐ฉ DM โ @NBAGODX
๐5๐1๐ค1
๐ NBA GOD VIP Season 2026 ๐ September Performance Report โ Profit: +1620โฌ (+16.20u) ๐ฐ ROI: 21.60% ๐ฏ Success rate: 66.67% (50W / 25L) ๐ผ Current bankroll: 3620โฌ (start 2000โฌ) ๐ต Average stake: 1 unit (100โฌ) โ๏ธ Average odds: 1.831 ๐ Bet Analytix: Click here
๐5โค2๐1
๐ VIP Recap - 25.09 โ ๐พ Cerundolo +1.5 Sets โ ๐พ Jodar to win โ๐พ Faria to win โ๐ Tofas -7.5 Handicap โ ๐พ Caniato to win 3 Wins โ 2 Losses โ 0 Void ๐
โค3๐1๐1
๐ Join VIP and get access to all our picks & analysis! ๐ณ VIP Access - Pay securely here ๐ฉ DM โ @NBAGODX
๐5๐1๐ค1
Showing the 12 most recent of 257 posts we hold for @NBAGODTips. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@NBAGODTips edited 17 posts after it first published โ the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
๐ How long have you been following the channel?
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
๐ ATP MONTREAL FINAL ๐พ
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 257 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 27 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
@NBAGODTips named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 79 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ NBA GOD | FREE TIPSโ (@NBAGODTips), 31,659 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/NBAGODTips.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.