Channel
@usti2020
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
65subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003766596504 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @usti2020 |
| Description | УСТИ, но ХСТИ. |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/usti2020 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:16 | 65 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 65 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (31 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 822 |
| Reactions total | 19 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 02:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
19 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 31.6% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 15.8% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 10.5% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 5.26% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 5.26% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 5.26% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Русские фанатки Приматки на месте? Примат русских презирал всегда. Не все знают, но если чуть поинтересоваться, можно найти информацию о том, что до критики Ислама были времена, когда Примат фанател от Шамиля Басаева и других «вахабитов», а весь его канал был посвящен русско-чеченскому военному конфликту, где он на перманентной основе презирал всё русское до глубины души. От фаната Шамиля, до критика Ислама 😂.
👍3
Давайте серьезно Среди развивающих ИИ есть ортодоксальные иудеи такфирящие государство Израиль по причине «средневековых споров» Есть христиане верующие в троицу Есть буддисты верующие непонятно во что Есть эзотерики верящие в пантеизм и вибрологию и нумерологию Глава разведки США Тулси Габбард недавно попалилась на полном треше - оказалось что она абсолютно подчиняется не государственной политике а слепо слушае…
🤝2
Человек развивает искусственный интеллект, не то что вы погрязшие в средневековых спорах Ихваны вам не тошно быть такими? ) ➡️️️️️️️ Кнопка для вступления на канал - ЖМИ
📚 Один из шнырей и админов Пхармата, по имени «Элди Чишни» (не путать с Дишни), порочащий Ислам всеми что есть оскорблениями, и проживающий в Швеции. Человек у которого мать не известно где шляется, одна сестра замужем за безбожника араба, а вторая за безбожника шведа, и при всем этом, он любит втирать чеченцам про «Нохчалла», и то как нужно придерживаться чеченских традиций. 📕 Интересно, почему же все эти Нохчал-п…
📓 Книга: «Утешение для скорбящих сердец» Каждый человек проходит через испытания. Но не каждый знает, где найти настоящее утешение. 📖 Перед вами драгоценное послание имама Ибн аль-Каййима رحمه الله, извлечённое из книги «Зад аль-Ма’ад», в котором он разъясняет причины, исцеляющие сердце от скорби, тревоги и печали, и указывает путь к терпению, довольству и упованию на Аллаха. ✈️ Канал | @maktabatuzalzalya
❤🔥1
«Не мужское это дело — обсуждать женщин».
✅ Видео-ответ на единственное, что Пхармат смог привести за всё время, как я ему бросал вызов! https://vt.tiktok.com/ZS4B2owJX/ Поставьте лайки, отмечайте Пхармата, пишите больше комментариев и делитесь видео.
✍1👍1🔥1
Чтобы понять насколько мир изменился, достаточно просто рассмотреть артефакты из прошлого, чтобы понять как люди мыслили в те времена. Примерно так было в Италии 15 век — читайте скрин. 1. Женщина рождалась и воспитывалась с пониманием своей роли. Ей с детства прививали, что её место — в доме, под защитой и руководством мужчины. 2. Общество (родственники, соседи, церковь) контролировало отклонения. Любое «своенрави…
Voice message, posted without a caption
💯3
Оцените сий шедевр
🤣3😁2
А вот это было обидно 🤣🤣😂 Мы не ево уровен
✅ Мы приглашаем к дискуссии любого, кто публично критикует Ислам и имеет широкую аудиторию. Пусть он представит от 1 до 5 своих самых сильных доводов против истинности Ислама в виде статьи или видео. Для установления истины достаточно и одного довода, однако здесь критик получает фору. Сторона мусульман обязуется дать аргументированный письменный или видео ответ на каждый из представленных тезисов. В случае возник…
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @usti2020. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 867,618 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хохмим с Типичных Исламофобов” (@usti2020), 65 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/usti2020.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.