Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for katrin_rul / Екатерина Рулева

Channel

katrin_rul / Екатерина Рулева

@katrin_rul

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

35,817subscribers

+31 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001544739255
TypeChannel
Username@katrin_rul
DescriptionПовелительница объема и просто душевный визажист. Сотрудничество: @ojnepolya Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/68337f5984987126e4e5dc48
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/katrin_rul

Growth

35,72935,84935,7897 August 2026 — 35,786 subscribers7 August 2026 — 35,786 subscribers7 August 2026 — 35,792 subscribers8 August 2026 — 35,793 subscribers10 August 2026 — 35,788 subscribers11 August 2026 — 35,774 subscribers12 August 2026 — 35,767 subscribers13 August 2026 — 35,756 subscribers14 August 2026 — 35,745 subscribers16 August 2026 — 35,729 subscribers17 August 2026 — 35,806 subscribers18 August 2026 — 35,824 subscribers19 August 2026 — 35,849 subscribers20 August 2026 — 35,847 subscribers21 August 2026 — 35,827 subscribers23 August 2026 — 35,817 subscribers35,8177 August 202623 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 16 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,711–35,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 03:1735,817-10
21 Aug 2026, 15:4735,827-20
20 Aug 2026, 13:2235,847-2
19 Aug 2026, 14:0235,849+25
18 Aug 2026, 14:0535,824+18
17 Aug 2026, 14:1835,806+77
16 Aug 2026, 04:0835,729-16
14 Aug 2026, 13:2735,745-11
13 Aug 2026, 04:1635,756-11
12 Aug 2026, 04:0235,767-7
11 Aug 2026, 02:4135,774-14
10 Aug 2026, 03:3135,788-5
8 Aug 2026, 23:5035,793+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:2235,792+6
7 Aug 2026, 14:3035,786no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:2135,786first reading

Engagement

30 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 35,817 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,800
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 30 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held30 (17 July 202623 August 2026)
Views total171,550
Reactions total5,306
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,240
Videos
266
Links
296

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 27s
Average length
49s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

6,720 reactions across 29 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54589084926874972062,30534.3%
custom 53797699278025674871,60223.8%
custom 53822587926311213381,27719.0%
custom 538888831517066567599014.7%
custom 51906839453515350762724.05%
custom 62037976115692189851071.59%
custom 6325476444541552410901.34%
custom 6325762240255362536771.15%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,720reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 29 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @katrin_rul. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈2,190 views67 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

История: когда-то давныыыым давно, когда я ещё училась в универе, летом я подрабатывала в торговом центре на акции «Собери свою отличницу в школу». Всем купившим определенные товары в IKEA, мы выдавали кружки с логотипом… Времена идут и акции меняются. И у меня есть для вас кое-что получше, чем кружка в подарок🤭 Яндекс Фабрика в преддверии школьного сезона запустила распродажу на Озон от брендов фабрики И даже есл

custom 545890849268749720639custom 538225879263112133818custom 537976992780256748710

22 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC≈3,910 views163 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Так, ну с банками вышло что-то вот такое🤔 Вроде бы сносно… п.с. я НЕ кудрявая. Волосы +/- средней степени пористости

custom 5458908492687497206104custom 538888831517066567543custom 519068394535153507616

22 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC≈4,500 views179 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 5379769927802567487102custom 545890849268749720648custom 538225879263112133829

21 Aug 2026, 15:03 UTC≈4,830 views142 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video

Вы часто просите меня рассказывать про стайлеры из разных ценовых категорий А я только за, девочки! Сегодня мы обозреваем новый для меня бренд QYRON Найти стайлер можно на WB, но дочитайте до конца, чтобы увидеть промокод❤️ Итак, стайлер QYRON приходит в симпатичном кейсе и в комплекте у него есть: насадки коанды, сопло, два брашинга (овальный и круглый) Стайлер может из палки складываться в форму фена. Это делает

custom 538225879263112133878custom 545890849268749720655custom 51906839453515350769

20 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC≈5,530 views139 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 545890849268749720694custom 538888831517066567523custom 538225879263112133822

19 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC≈6,220 views179 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Video

Мои хорошие, я вам уже рассказывала про текстурайзер от этого бренда, теперь пришло время обзора и других баночек в линейке☝🏻 Представляю вашему вниманию укладку на стайлинг от бренда SoWell studio✨ Для начала, пару слов о том, какой у них текстурайзер: не сильно пудровый и не бетонный. Но и очень мягким я его назвать не могу. Скорее средний по плотности и фиксации, как раз то, что любят использовать многие из вас

custom 5458908492687497206131custom 538225879263112133830custom 51906839453515350769custom 53888883151706656759

18 Aug 2026, 19:19 UTC≈6,670 views233 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 5458908492687497206165custom 538225879263112133850custom 632576224025536253614custom 53888883151706656754

17 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC≈7,330 views211 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Сухие текстурайзеры до 1000 и до 1500₽ 👀 Я сплю? Если да, то не будите. Я там, где хочу быть😂 Что сказать, оба очень даже неплохие! Сухой текстурайзер от бренда SoWell studio Он не бетонной. В нем совсем немного «пудровости», которую не все любят. Он фиксирует, возобновляет, да ещё и ухаживает. Бренд добавил в продукт уходовые компоненты✍🏼 Для меня - это идеальный «будничный» вариант. Когда не нужно экстра вычурно

custom 5458908492687497206170custom 538225879263112133832custom 51906839453515350769

16 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC≈7,340 views223 reactionsread 23 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 5382258792631121338102custom 545890849268749720688custom 537976992780256748723custom 519068394535153507610

15 Aug 2026, 07:32 UTC≈7,650 views113 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Я думала, что всё, что я видела про этот продукт - это недостоверная инфа🗿 ну или не так…переоцененная информация. Вот. Я ещё никогда так не ошибалась, коллеги… Обозреваем подушку бренда Beauty Sleep Omnia Дисклеймер: Она лишь косвенно относится к бьюти (по моему мнению), но хочу вам рассказать, что может произойти, если вы попробуете на ней спать: Итак, я думаю, что вы видели множество вот таких коллажей с подуш

custom 545890849268749720676custom 538225879263112133820custom 537976992780256748717

14 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC≈7,100 views251 reactions1 Starread 23 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 5379769927802567487173custom 545890849268749720657custom 519068394535153507614custom 53822587926311213387

Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @katrin_rul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“katrin_rul / Екатерина Рулева” (@katrin_rul), 35,817 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katrin_rul.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.