Повелительница объема и просто душевный визажист.
Сотрудничество: @ojnepolya
Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/68337f5984987126e4e5dc48
Created
Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
16 measurements spanning 16 days, net +31. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35,711–35,867 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
23 Aug 2026, 03:17
35,817
-10
21 Aug 2026, 15:47
35,827
-20
20 Aug 2026, 13:22
35,847
-2
19 Aug 2026, 14:02
35,849
+25
18 Aug 2026, 14:05
35,824
+18
17 Aug 2026, 14:18
35,806
+77
16 Aug 2026, 04:08
35,729
-16
14 Aug 2026, 13:27
35,745
-11
13 Aug 2026, 04:16
35,756
-11
12 Aug 2026, 04:02
35,767
-7
11 Aug 2026, 02:41
35,774
-14
10 Aug 2026, 03:31
35,788
-5
8 Aug 2026, 23:50
35,793
+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:22
35,792
+6
7 Aug 2026, 14:30
35,786
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:21
35,786
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.8%
avg views ÷ 35,817 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,800
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.09%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026
Posts held
30 (17 July 2026 – 23 August 2026)
Views total
171,550
Reactions total
5,306
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,240
Videos
≈266
Links
≈296
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 27s
Average length
49s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,720 reactions across 29 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5458908492687497206
2,305
34.3%
custom 5379769927802567487
1,602
23.8%
custom 5382258792631121338
1,277
19.0%
custom 5388888315170665675
990
14.7%
custom 5190683945351535076
272
4.05%
custom 6203797611569218985
107
1.59%
custom 6325476444541552410
90
1.34%
custom 6325762240255362536
77
1.15%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,720reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 29 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @katrin_rul. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 30 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
История: когда-то давныыыым давно, когда я ещё училась в универе, летом я подрабатывала в торговом центре на акции «Собери свою отличницу в школу». Всем купившим определенные товары в IKEA, мы выдавали кружки с логотипом…
Времена идут и акции меняются.
И у меня есть для вас кое-что получше, чем кружка в подарок🤭
Яндекс Фабрика в преддверии школьного сезона запустила распродажу на Озон от брендов фабрики
И даже есл…
Вы часто просите меня рассказывать про стайлеры из разных ценовых категорий
А я только за, девочки!
Сегодня мы обозреваем новый для меня бренд QYRON
Найти стайлер можно на WB, но дочитайте до конца, чтобы увидеть промокод❤️
Итак, стайлер QYRON приходит в симпатичном кейсе и в комплекте у него есть: насадки коанды, сопло, два брашинга (овальный и круглый)
Стайлер может из палки складываться в форму фена. Это делает…
Мои хорошие, я вам уже рассказывала про текстурайзер от этого бренда, теперь пришло время обзора и других баночек в линейке☝🏻
Представляю вашему вниманию укладку на стайлинг от бренда SoWell studio✨
Для начала, пару слов о том, какой у них текстурайзер: не сильно пудровый и не бетонный. Но и очень мягким я его назвать не могу. Скорее средний по плотности и фиксации, как раз то, что любят использовать многие из вас …
Сухие текстурайзеры до 1000 и до 1500₽ 👀
Я сплю?
Если да, то не будите. Я там, где хочу быть😂
Что сказать, оба очень даже неплохие!
Сухой текстурайзер от бренда SoWell studio
Он не бетонной. В нем совсем немного «пудровости», которую не все любят. Он фиксирует, возобновляет, да ещё и ухаживает. Бренд добавил в продукт уходовые компоненты✍🏼
Для меня - это идеальный «будничный» вариант. Когда не нужно экстра вычурно…
Я думала, что всё, что я видела про этот продукт - это недостоверная инфа🗿 ну или не так…переоцененная информация. Вот.
Я ещё никогда так не ошибалась, коллеги…
Обозреваем подушку бренда Beauty Sleep Omnia
Дисклеймер: Она лишь косвенно относится к бьюти (по моему мнению), но хочу вам рассказать, что может произойти, если вы попробуете на ней спать:
Итак, я думаю, что вы видели множество вот таких коллажей с подуш…
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @katrin_rul. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“katrin_rul / Екатерина Рулева” (@katrin_rul), 35,817 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/katrin_rul.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.