Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views and reactions moved apart
On 4 of the 188 posts we watched over 30 days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0083 reactions per view.
Each interval, as we read it — views and reactions before and after
Expected is the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).
What this does and does not say. It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.
Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 26 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 52 days, net +52,002. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,092,261–1,277,903 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 22:36
1,178,609
-21,622
19 Sept 2026, 15:57
1,200,231
-2,713
17 Sept 2026, 01:18
1,202,944
-2,966
15 Sept 2026, 04:20
1,205,910
-3,863
13 Sept 2026, 12:38
1,209,773
+1,024
11 Sept 2026, 16:41
1,208,749
-2,719
8 Sept 2026, 23:39
1,211,468
-965
5 Sept 2026, 13:20
1,212,433
+3,055
3 Sept 2026, 13:00
1,209,378
-686
2 Sept 2026, 06:13
1,210,064
+407
1 Sept 2026, 06:04
1,209,657
-6,219
31 Aug 2026, 04:26
1,215,876
-5,841
30 Aug 2026, 07:03
1,221,717
-6,801
29 Aug 2026, 05:36
1,228,518
-1,735
28 Aug 2026, 03:45
1,230,253
-5,597
27 Aug 2026, 00:53
1,235,850
-8,655
26 Aug 2026, 01:23
1,244,505
-8,808
25 Aug 2026, 04:44
1,253,313
-3,170
23 Aug 2026, 22:14
1,256,483
+25,866
22 Aug 2026, 06:14
1,230,617
first reading
Engagement
418 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.20%
avg views ÷ 1,178,609 subscribers
Avg views / post
14,100
227 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.951%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
227
of 418 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
418 (5 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
3,206,200
Reactions total
30,485
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
27 Sept 2026, 03:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
58m 02s
Average length
28s
Measured directly from 123 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 188 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (4 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 184 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 5.2 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 28.8% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 71.2% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 11,200 views — 0.95% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 15,600).
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
67,784 reactions across 415 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
35,733
52.7%
😁
12,324
18.2%
😢
7,120
10.5%
🔥
5,676
8.37%
🥰
3,415
5.04%
👏
1,807
2.67%
🏆
1,087
1.60%
🤗
622
0.918%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 418 of the 418 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68,118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 418 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.957%
4 of 418 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
4
posts carrying an erid · 4 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
10,400
over 4 measured posts
Median views · rest
16,500
over 414 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2SDnjcrHSmZ
1
9 September 2026
9 September 2026
2VtzquhMzpT
1
14 August 2026
14 August 2026
2W5zFG3BXWh
1
21 September 2026
21 September 2026
2W5zFGgkQrd
1
18 August 2026
18 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 418 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Из-за этого концерт Канье может СОСТОЯТЬСЯ — организаторам останется только договориться с ареной.
Всё из-за того, что требование получать разрешение властей на общественные мероприятия отменяют вместе с ковидными ограничениями.
Последняя надежда у людей купивших билеты 👀
Коронавирус наконец-то ВСЁ — в Питере официально заканчивается эпоха ковидных ограничений: с 1 октября город отменит последние меры, действовавшие ещё с 2020 года.
Да, это правда 👀
Покупателям билетов на Канье ВЕРНУТ деньги — организаторы рассылают зрителям письма с уведомлениями о возврате средств: как и когда.
Эпопея с концертом всё-таки дошла до финальной серии 🤨
⚡️ Концерта Канье в Питере НЕ БУДЕТ — американское агентство Access Opera заявило, что шоу не состоится.
Представители агентства объяснили всё максимально просто: «Газпром Арена» ранее сообщила, что договора на проведение концерта нет, а без площадки выступление невозможно.
Ещё добавили, что Канье любит русский народ.
Вот и всё 💀💀💀
⚡️ Про Михаила Круга снимут большой БАЙОПИК — за фильм возьмутся братья Андреасян. Картина пройдёт по всей жизни музыканта: от детства и первых шагов в музыке до пика популярности и трагической гибели.
Съёмки планируют начать в 2027 году.
Наконец-то нормальный конкурент Майклу 😂
«Грудное молоко — первый суперфуд» — такую СОЦРЕКЛАМУ предложили показывать перед фильмами в российских кинотеатрах.
Ролики до 30 секунд хотят делать «в молодёжном стиле», чтобы продвигать материнство и семейные ценности. В финале зрителям покажут QR-код со ссылкой на проверенные ресурсы поддержки.
Еще предлагаем рекламировать хлеб как суперфуд 👀
СММщик Чижика ушёл в отпуск и случайно запустил один из самых МИЛЫХ флешмобов в Тредс — просто попросил подписчиков присмотреть за птенцом.
Пользователи восприняли задачу слишком серьёзно, а потом подключились бренды: Чижика успели сводить к врачу и психологу, накормить хинкали, обновить ему гардероб и причёску, отправить на шопинг и даже косметические процедуры.
Вот ради такого интернет и существует 👍
Русский ОТВЕТ Гарри Поттеру — Тина Канделаки нашла российского «убийцу Гарри Поттера» — по её словам, новая часть «Волшебника Изумрудного города» может вырасти в большую мировую франшизу.
Продюсер особенно похвалила масштабные сцены и заявила, что такого уровня аттракционов не было даже в фильмах о Гарри Поттере. Проверить амбиции можно будет уже 1 января 2027 года — новая часть выйдет всего через неделю после премь…
ЛИСТОВКИ в почтовых ящиках снова врываются в тренды. Механику освежили Свои Плюсы — таким неожиданным способом объявили о дропе товаров для владельцев Золотого уровня, которые можно получить за баллы Плюса. Там дорогая техника дешевле обычного: айфоны из недавнего релиза, нишевые фотоаппараты, модный Whoop.
Годный повод списать накопленные баллы Плюса подъехал 👍
❤22🔥6😁4😢1
Showing the 12 most recent of 418 posts we hold for @trendi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@trendi edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 418 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тренды задавать” (@trendi), 1,178,609 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/trendi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
