13 measurements spanning 11 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,534–20,675 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 18:05
20,550
-20
15 Aug 2026, 06:28
20,570
-26
14 Aug 2026, 01:47
20,596
-15
12 Aug 2026, 22:13
20,611
-15
11 Aug 2026, 23:03
20,626
-6
11 Aug 2026, 01:18
20,632
-27
10 Aug 2026, 04:00
20,659
+14
9 Aug 2026, 01:14
20,645
+12
8 Aug 2026, 01:26
20,633
+1
7 Aug 2026, 04:22
20,632
+26
6 Aug 2026, 07:50
20,606
+16
6 Aug 2026, 02:06
20,590
no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:35
20,590
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
28.0%
avg views ÷ 20,550 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,760
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.29%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held
19 (29 June 2026 – 14 August 2026)
Views total
46,070
Reactions total
1,057
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
85
Videos
50
Links
39
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
18m 17s
Average length
2m 37s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,647 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,682
46.1%
🔥
1,175
32.2%
👍
423
11.6%
👏
333
9.13%
🤔
22
0.603%
👎
12
0.329%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,647reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
71
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 18 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @breytenbikher. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 June 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Спасибо большое всем, кто ответил и не поленился подсветить, что следовало бы доработать 🙌
Были фактические неточности, где-то мы не раскрыли тему до конца. Возразить нечего. Поправим.
Мальцов действительно выжил. С его же слов мы и узнали, что произошло на самом деле. Вальс ми минор незаслуженно не прозвучал в кадре. Когда пересматривал выпуск, то почему-то именно теперь увидел место, куда его следовало поставить.…
Услышал на радио РБК (тут их анонс) у Александра Аузана интересную отсылку к концепции «дневных» и «ночных» эпох Бердяева.
Суть этой метафоры в том, что всегда время устойчивого порядка, уверенности и рациональности, дневная эпоха, сменяется временами разрушения старых форм, кризиса, поиска новых смыслов и рождения будущего, ночной эпохой.
Если провести экстраполяцию этой философии через век и продолжить его логику…
Спасибо большое всем, кто откликнулся, особенно за развернутые комментарии как здесь, так и на YouTube канале под видео к моим скромным попыткам поделиться собственным и новым открытием Александра Грибоедова.
Замечания, дополнения и критику отрабатываю отдельно. В ближайшее время сделаю с ответами на все вопросы по теме и не только отдельное видео.
Отдельно благодарю за новых предложенных героев. Выделил для себя н…
Недавно выступал c лекцией перед студентами СПбГУ. Говорили о рынке труда, в котором к 2030 году, по оценкам, изменится около 40% ключевых навыков.
За этой цифрой вполне человеческая история. Однажды компетенция, на которую ты опирался годами, перестает быть преимуществом. Поэтому обсуждали системное мышление, адаптивность и способность заново собирать собственную экспертизу. Умение учиться сегодня важно, как никогд…
На сайте Forbes вышла наша совместная с Ярославом Глазуновым статья про преемственность бизнеса.
Тема важная, местами болезненная и от этого к ней можно подступаться бесконечно, ни разу не подступившись. Мы разложили передачу бизнеса наследникам на пять шагов с примерами из мировой практики.
Любой бизнес, особенно большой, всегда про своего основателя. Когда десятилетиями строишь свое дело, срастаешься с ним до нер…
Если помните, ровно месяц назад я анонсировал новый проект – «Классики. Непридуманная жизнь».
Мой взгляд на тех, кого мы почему-то не привыкли видеть за рамками школьного портрета. Упуская, что они такие же живые люди, как мы с вами, которые занимали деньги, любили, судились, действовали безрассудно и нередко ставили на карту собственную жизнь.
Первый выпуск из цикла – про Грибоедова. Дипломата, умевшего договорить…
От барьера десять шагов, между барьерами пятнадцать, стрелять можно трижды, осечка идет за выстрел. На этих условиях 27 июля 1841 года у подножия Машука отставной майор Мартынов встал напротив поручика Лермонтова. Сто восемьдесят пять лет назад. Чем это закончилось, мы знаем.
Занимает меня тут одна деталь: печатного дуэльного кодекса тогда попросту не было. Дурасов издаст свой свод только в начале следующего века, к…
Вокруг «опыта» сложился ореол неприкосновенности. Хотя сам по себе он не дает права быть правым.
В текущих реалиях он палка о двух концах. Опыт редко дает знание, чаще – уверенность в том, что когда-то сработало. Контекст и время, при этом, остаются за скобками, хотя решают, к чему прибегнуть, именно они.
Юм разобрал эту механику еще в восемнадцатом веке. Из того, что раньше всегда было так, логически не следует, ч…
Когда я только начинал в банке, про опыт КВН предпочитал не рассказывать. Казалось, что банкир должен выглядеть предельно серьезным: хмурить брови, говорить сухим языком цифр, что в принципе мне, как математику, было комфортно и близко. Так и держал эти две части своей жизни врозь.
Потом пришло осознание, что это, скорее, мешает, чем помогает. Особенно в клиентском бизнесе. Если человек зашорен в рамках стандартных …
Ко дню рождения мне прислали из новосибирских архивов эту запись.
25 лет назад я впервые попал в рекламу на телевидение. Играл человека, от которого из-за плохой мобильной связи ушла девушка.
С тех пор связь стала лучше и проще. А девушки… видимо, сложнее.
Живыми нас делают противоречия
Каждый раз, бывая в Петербурге, не перестаю радоваться жизненной противоречивости города, где выверенные с математической точностью линии и перспективы уживаются с неуемной творческой энергией.
Ницше называл эти два начала аполлоническим и дионисийским. Мерой и стихией. Формой и порывом.
В этом городе уживаются пушкинское: «Люблю тебя, Петра творенье…», гоголевское: «О, не верьте это…
❤145🔥62👏10
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @breytenbikher. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 2,622 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Брейтенбихер” (@breytenbikher), 20,550 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/breytenbikher.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
