Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -682. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,340–39,226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
26 Sept 2026, 04:17
38,442
-27
19 Sept 2026, 10:59
38,469
-39
17 Sept 2026, 01:18
38,508
-47
15 Sept 2026, 01:21
38,555
-2
13 Sept 2026, 10:16
38,557
-28
11 Sept 2026, 13:01
38,585
-70
8 Sept 2026, 19:39
38,655
-66
5 Sept 2026, 15:58
38,721
-19
3 Sept 2026, 19:38
38,740
-5
2 Sept 2026, 11:26
38,745
-11
1 Sept 2026, 14:55
38,756
-4
31 Aug 2026, 16:38
38,760
-16
30 Aug 2026, 20:06
38,776
-13
29 Aug 2026, 17:25
38,789
-13
28 Aug 2026, 14:54
38,802
-12
27 Aug 2026, 17:02
38,814
+13
26 Aug 2026, 18:12
38,801
+20
25 Aug 2026, 19:37
38,781
-25
24 Aug 2026, 20:26
38,806
-49
23 Aug 2026, 05:47
38,855
first reading
Engagement
401 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.35%
avg views ÷ 38,442 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,290
267 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.503%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
268
of 401 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 203 of 267 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 October 2026
Posts held
401 (4 August 2026 – 1 October 2026)
Views total
343,800
Reactions total
1,376
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
1 Oct 2026, 19:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,400
Videos
≈227
Links
≈1,360
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 1 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
2m 10s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,606 reactions across 317 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,391
66.3%
🔥
755
20.9%
👍
324
8.99%
🤩
136
3.77%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 332 of the 401 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,606 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 401 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
100
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 400 we hold a reading for · 0.3%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tradingwsidhant. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 401 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Yesterday: 6 of you said the tip was new. 9 of you knew it already.
Concept in 60 seconds: order flow and CVD
Order flow means that you watch who presses the button. Some buyers buy at market price. Some sellers sell at market price.
CVD (cumulative volume delta) is a running total of that. Market buys add to it. Market sells subtract from it.
It is like a sabzi mandi (vegetable market). The price board is the ch…
About the rule you broke
Maybe you took an extra trade yesterday. Maybe you traded without a stop loss. Now you cannot look at yesterday's chart.
That heavy look back is useful for 1 minute. After that, it often causes the next mistake.
Minute 1
Breathe in for 4, out for 6. Do this 6 times. About 60 seconds.
Minute 2
Name the feeling in 1 word. Score it from 1 to 10. Ask: Am I trying to get money back from yesterd…
This week, 29 of you tapped "Sitting out today" on a day with no clear setup. On those days, doing nothing was the plan working. That is how TWS GurukulX works.
Nifty close, Thu 1 Oct
Nifty 50 closed at 22,421.95. That is 198.50 points (0.88%) below yesterday's close of 22,620.45.
Day range: 22,217.30 to 22,610.60. It closed in the middle of the range.
Bank Nifty closed at 54,450.75, 182.30 points (0.33%) lower.
Simple meaning: a close in the middle means neither side won the day clearly.
Price shows what happened. Our job is to read it, not to guess it.
Koi baat nahi …
Nifty closed at 22422 after a rough day.
23 said below, 38 said above.
Gold closed 4163.97, below 4169. Team B was right today.
Vikram, Saurabh and Thedeadman voted below this morning. Well played.
Chalo, here is the gold map. As I write this, gold is at 4,185.
The Resistance Area above price is 4,197. This morning's Asia session high is at that price, and sellers pushed price down from there a few hours ago.
4,153 is Support for now. It is yesterday's low, and buyers stopped the fall there yesterday and held that price.
Trigger to watch: a 1 hour close above 4,197. Then my next Area is yesterday's high at 4,…
EURUSD C-0068 reached my stop loss at 1.1324. This is the loss I planned for before I entered.
Result from the first entry touch, the far stop edge and the near target edge.
Long on EURUSD 👀
Direction: Up, sellers failed below yesterday's low
Area: Support 1.1326, yesterday's low
Trigger: 15 min candle closed back above it, 2.2x normal size
Entry zone 1.1326 to 1.1327
Stop loss 1.1324 (extra room beyond the signal candle)
Target 1 zone 1.1330 to 1.1332 (recent high)
Target 2 zone 1.1334 to 1.1337 (recent high)
C-0068
You followed your plan and still lost?
Then you did your job. A loss with a plan and normal risk is part of the cost of trading.
Tonight, judge the decision, not the result. Ask one thing: did I follow my rules?
The urge to move your stop is strong for about 60 seconds. Put your phone down for those 60 seconds. Your calm plan is smarter than that urge.
Say it to yourself:
When I want to move my stop, my phone goes…
Nifty first hour, Thu 1 Oct
Nifty 50 opened at 22,551.95. That is 68.50 points below yesterday's close of 22,620.45, a gap down.
First hour range: 22,508.05 to 22,610.60. At 10:20 Nifty was at 22,567, inside the first hour range.
Bank Nifty opened at 54,791.90, 158.85 points above its last close.
Simple meaning: a gap down means the first price today was lower than the last close. Orders placed before 9:15 set th…
I followed the plan on EURUSD C-0067 ✅
Direction: Up, sellers failed below yesterday's low
Area: Support 1.1326, yesterday's low
Trigger: 15 min candle closed back above it
Judge the trade by your plan. Do not think about the bigger move you missed.
I closed half, and the rest closed at my entry. I made 0.79 times what I risked on this trade.
Result from the first entry touch, the far stop edge and the near target…
Showing the 12 most recent of 401 posts we hold for @tradingwsidhant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Hello Community! 👋
I’m coming to Bangalore as a speaker on Friday, 18th September... just about 3 weeks from now. Would love to know how many of you would be interested in joining us at the event. ❤️ Vote below:
1️⃣ Yes! How do I book the tickets?15%
2️⃣ Interested, want to know more first21%
3️⃣ Would love to, but I’m not from Bangalore71%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 401 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 1 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Trade with Siddhant @tradewithsiddhant · 30,071 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
Stock Ideas by TCI®🎯📈🧠 @tradingcafeindia · 76,613 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Raiden Trading @raidentrading · 28,220 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 9 September 2026
Grow OnSpot LIVE @growonspot · 155,802 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Aism India @indiaaism · 39,666 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
Wealthsecretofficial @wealthsecretofficial1 · 101,458 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Traders Paradise Live @tradersparadise · 249,909 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
Finance Talk With Rishabh 🚀 @financetalkwithrishabhFTWR · 49,488 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026
Impact Trading Inc @impacttradinginc · 45,029 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Ghost Trader’s by Manish Maheshwari @ghosttradeindicator · 65,357 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 21 August 2026
Power Of Stocks @PowerOfStocks · 273,293 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
Option Trading Only @optiontradingoriginal · 34,610 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Trade With Prateek Sahni @tradewithprateek · 46,019 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
InvestLikeBerlin @investlikeberlin · 49,919 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 25 August 2026
TradewithGG @TradewithGG · 21,730 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
inDay Trading ™ @upmazing · 25,550 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 13 September 2026
Game of Charts @gameofcharts · 28,991 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
Tradewith.krishna @Tradewith_krishna · 31,358 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 5 September 2026
TradeLikeBerlin @tradelikeberlin · 148,872 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Kundan Trader⚡🚀 @traderkundan · 21,487 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 23 September 2026
The option trading @the_option_trading · 54,258 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
GHASHYAM TECH ART @Ghanshyam_Tech_Art_Of_Trade · 23,342 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 18 September 2026
Booming Bulls Academy @boomingbullscompany · 340,251 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
TheDoji @The_Doji · 36,494 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 79 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Trading With Sidhant [NO DM]” (@tradingwsidhant), 38,442 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradingwsidhant.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.