Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Trade with Siddhant

@tradewithsiddhant

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

29,069subscribers

-84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001508544157
TypeChannel
Username@tradewithsiddhant
DescriptionNOT FINANCIAL ADVICE, NOR AM I SEBI REGISTERED PERSON, THIS IS MY VIEW PLEASE DON’T TRADE ON THIS :) *THIS IS ONLY FOR LEARNING*
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tradewithsiddhant

Growth

29,06929,15329,1117 August 2026 — 29,153 subscribers7 August 2026 — 29,153 subscribers8 August 2026 — 29,129 subscribers9 August 2026 — 29,153 subscribers10 August 2026 — 29,138 subscribers11 August 2026 — 29,118 subscribers12 August 2026 — 29,113 subscribers13 August 2026 — 29,092 subscribers14 August 2026 — 29,069 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -84. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,056–29,166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:4329,069-23
13 Aug 2026, 11:3829,092-21
12 Aug 2026, 10:0729,113-5
11 Aug 2026, 13:4329,118-20
10 Aug 2026, 15:3529,138-15
9 Aug 2026, 13:1129,153+24
8 Aug 2026, 10:1229,129-24
7 Aug 2026, 13:3729,153no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:1529,153first reading

Engagement

87 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.56%
avg views ÷ 29,069 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,320
85 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
87
of 87 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held87 (6 August 202614 August 2026)
Views total112,603
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 02:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,410
Videos
36
Links
1,460

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
36m 27s
Average length
36m 27s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC197 viewsread 15 August 2026

This is a golden opportunity for every subscriber who joins my channel VIP

14 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC≈1,070 viewsread 15 August 2026

https://algotest.in/register?referral=TWSIDD you can go experiment too, also you get 25% extra credits only via my link.

13 Aug 2026, 12:35 UTC≈1,350 viewsread 15 August 2026

If you have the course, please check updated it with todays trade and how to tackle CAS as of now. With some tips in it, with my august pnl :)

Showing the 12 most recent of 87 posts we hold for @tradewithsiddhant. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 06:22 UTCAnonymous Poll222 voters

What do you guys do?

  1. Active investing20%
  2. Swing momentum50%
  3. Options?56%

The shares total 126%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTCAnonymous Poll115 voters

do you guys like active investing stuff?

  1. yes86%
  2. no14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Aug 2026, 04:18 UTCAnonymous Poll104 voters

Would you guys like to see swing trading content?

  1. yes92%
  2. no8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 87 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

TradeLikeBerlin
@tradelikeberlin · 150,465
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Theta Gainers
@thetagainers · 114,646
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Trade with Siddhant” (@tradewithsiddhant), 29,069 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tradewithsiddhant.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.