Crypto live start

Channel
Virendra Pandey - VP Capital Research Pvt Ltd
@Virendrapandey81
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
85,469subscribers
-12,209 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001195089726 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Virendrapandey81 |
| Description | This channel operates under the SEBI-registered Research Analyst VP Capital Research Pvt. Ltd., License No. INH000020217. The content of this channel does not constitute financial, investment, tax, or legal advice. Always consult your financial advisor |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Virendrapandey81 |
Topic
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 23:58 | 85,469 | -593 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 21:55 | 86,062 | -586 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:56 | 86,648 | -395 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 87,043 | -774 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 87,817 | -1,060 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 88,877 | -736 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:21 | 89,613 | -463 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:40 | 90,076 | -257 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 20:27 | 90,333 | -281 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 90,614 | -173 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 17:36 | 90,787 | -391 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 91,178 | -262 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:13 | 91,440 | -390 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:44 | 91,830 | -168 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:22 | 91,998 | -161 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:58 | 92,159 | -462 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 92,621 | -528 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 93,149 | -519 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 19:06 | 93,668 | -397 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 94,065 | first reading |
Engagement
603 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 6.89%
- avg views ÷ 85,469 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,890
- 390 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.381%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 391
- of 603 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 388 of 390 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 603 (6 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,297,439 |
| Reactions total | 8,733 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 14:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,630
- Videos
- ≈4
- Links
- ≈2,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 11s
- Average length
- 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,966 reactions across 598 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5,633 | 40.3% | |
| 🙏 | 3,639 | 26.1% | |
| 🔥 | 1,113 | 7.97% | |
| 🤪 | 916 | 6.56% | |
| 👏 | 743 | 5.32% | |
| 😢 | 677 | 4.85% | |
| 🥰 | 322 | 2.31% | |
| 😭 | 217 | 1.55% | |
| 😨 | 145 | 1.04% | |
| 🎉 | 118 | 0.845% | |
| 😴 | 116 | 0.831% | |
| ✍ | 99 | 0.709% | |
| 😍 | 70 | 0.501% | |
| 👌 | 65 | 0.465% | |
| 🤝 | 56 | 0.401% | |
| 😇 | 37 | 0.265% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 598 of the 603 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,966 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 603 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
https://youtube.com/live/HDGZrkJtqWg
https://youtu.be/BdTUILtDbKk
👍3🔥1
FNO PULSE Registration Link 👇🏻👇🏻🙏🏻 https://superprofile.bio/vig/68dba9e96eef7600135fd5fe 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 Disclaimer: https://vpcapitalresearch.com/research-disclaimer
👍2😨1
Virendra Pandey - VP Capital Research Pvt Ltd pinned «I have opened a new channel for my all our Mentee who has opened an Dmat account with us Please check your email ( Inbox or Spam) after 4 PM»
I have opened a new channel for my all our Mentee who has opened an Dmat account with us Please check your email ( Inbox or Spam) after 4 PM
👍15🙏3✍2
23550 Ce buy at 3 or cmp zero to hero trade
🤪41👍25😨13🔥3🥰2
We will talk about this in evening how to catch it from the bottom
👍27😍6🤪3
Photo, posted without a caption
👍7🤪3🥰1
23410 is the confirmation , wait for the price
👍19😴5
this is a liquidity hunt
👍8😭1
Ready
👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 603 posts we hold for @Virendrapandey81. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Virendrapandey81 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 14 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 4 September 2026
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Hope you did not missed?
- Caught it42%
- Nope61%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Casino Open In ?
- Upside49%
- Downside53%
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
teach you how to get the zero to hero trade and why its only Call side , Catch it?
- Nope33%
- yes68%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
How much do you focus on Pre-Market Analysis? That’s exactly why you guys need to focus on Pre-Market Analysis. Data never lies. helping you in which direction, and with how much
- Every day — I follow Pre-Market Analysis61%
- Sometimes — depends on the market15%
- Rarely — I trade based on price action for myself15%
- I don’t follow it yet, but I want to learn15%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Only sellers know what is the point for options buying , Agreed?
- yes79%
- Nope24%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 603 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@SuperTraderLakshya · 126,239#1
@VpFinancials · 70,835#2
@iitiantradersaurabh · 154,294#3
@tsmgmack · 106,981#4
@Badshaitredingg · 30,244#5
@wealthsagaoriginal · 74,305#6
@opulencialearning · 2,631#7
@TradewithGG · 21,838#8
@optiontradingoriginal · 34,703#9
@LogicTradings · 16,261#10
@legend_of_trading · 160,815#11
@indextradingnitin · 200,405#12
@GHANSHYAMTECH · 273,265#13
@PowerOfStocks · 274,094#14
@becomeanindependenttrader · 56,273#15
@tradersparadise · 250,026#16
@aakankshatrading · 55,736#17
@naikmanjunathin · 357 (as read 16 August 2026)#18
@NayanPokharkar · 95,641#19
@voodootrainings · 54,887#20
@NKsingh100 · 67,800#21
@marketanalysisniftybanknifty · 32,083#22
@HarmonicsTraders · 8,138#23
@AngelOneAdvisory · 327,489#24
@gameofcharts · 29,102#25
@Lakshyaglobaltrades · 42,677#26
@Green_Traders0 · 14,320#27
@stockpro_online · 268,229#28
@ConceptualTrading · 54,324#29
@stockburner_trading · 235,884#30
@Tradewithzubare007 · 14,637#31
@stockideaofficial · 556,686#32
@ganndecoder · 10,000#33
@OptionsScalping · 29,179#34
@chartians · 56,982#35
@leverageResearch · 4,619#36
@Share_marketinfomania · 24,400#37
@umeshsharmachartanalysis · 39,350#38
@DrDevendraRenkoKing · 44,110#39
@thetraderoomss · 348,568#40
@leaverageConsultants · 69,509#41
@PhoenixHarmonicOfficial · 9,887#42
@Official_AngelOne · 306,109#43
@anantladhaofficialid · 190,668#44
@stocknews_live · 7,944#45
@tradingcafeindia · 76,613#46
@AKTradingGurukul · 29,654#47
@KotakNeo · 107,431#48
@bankniftyastroprediction · 4,290#49
@StockPhoenix · 75,636#50
@chaseAlpha · 24,375#51
@Gann_SharadJhun · 13,270#52
@chartkingz · 6,841#53
@FinanceWithSunil · 93,527#54
@moneycreatesmoney · 131,518#55
@thedevangmehra · 14,396#56
@StockMavericks7791 · 1,865#57
@Elliott_wave_India · 10,194#58
@thirstybulls · 4,975#59
@Sharemarkettimes_India · 41,954#60
@indiaaism · 39,899#61
@themukulagrawal · 179,880#62
@JoinDhan · 49,946#63
@learnwithsankalp · 6,286#64
@tradingvsinvesting · 2,834#65
@kuttrapali26 · 91,779#66
@astrostocksupdate · 12,738#67
@rvsoption · 20,087#68
@KunalMarketInsights · 796 (as read 16 August 2026)#69
@banknifty_nifty_sensex_option_s · 96,640#70
@ndtvprofitnews · 48,297#71
@Harmonicsintra_Positional_charts · 1,105#72
@STOCKGAINERSS · 111,479#73
@daytradertelugu · 381,460#74
@Darkhorseofstockmarket · 44,585#75
@FTUchart · 11,389#76
@fivepaisaofficial · 87,763#77
@NeeteshPathakOfficial · 3,392#78
@radhiyaduvanshi · 2,492#79
@swblearning · 56,668#80
@AceinkOfficial · 145,729#81
@tradelikeberlin · 148,879#82
@thetagainers · 112,736#83
@marketyatraoriginal · 125,436#84
@dwgalgo_T3Formula · 54,203#85
@equity99 · 101,487#86
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 16 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@VpFinancials · 70,835
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
@SuperTraderLakshya · 126,239
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 August 2026
@Badshaitredingg · 30,244
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 7 September 2026
@wealthsagaoriginal · 74,305
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 19 August 2026
@shrikant_kadam · 26,586
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 September 2026
@bankniftyplayer9 · 44,503
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 27 August 2026
@aakankshatrading · 55,736
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
@mkjtalks4investment · 57,153
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
@gameofcharts · 29,102
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@tsmgmack · 106,981
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
@TradewithGG · 21,838
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 22 September 2026
@Lakshyaglobaltrades · 42,677
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
@voodootrainings · 54,887
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
@becomeanindependenttrader · 56,273
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 23 August 2026
@marketanalysisniftybanknifty · 32,083
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
@KingResearch_harinder · 43,761
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
@optiontradingoriginal · 34,703
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
@thechartistt · 29,246
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
@StockPhoenix · 75,636
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
@nifty50dominator · 298,834
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
@PowerOfStocks · 274,094
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 August 2026
@chartcommando · 27,158
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
@themadrastrader1 · 64,453
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 21 August 2026
@tradingcafeindia · 76,613
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 58 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Virendra Pandey - VP Capital Research Pvt Ltd” (@Virendrapandey81), 85,469 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Virendrapandey81.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.