Мария Адольфссон "Штормовое предупреждение" Действие романа происходит в вымышленном островном государстве, расположенном между Данией и Великобританией. На дне карьера на самом северном острове, Ноорё, находят труп мужчины. Вскоре на острове случается еще одно убийство, на этот раз более жестокое. Связаны ли они между собой? В ходе расследования Карен Хорнби начинает подозревать, что в деле могут быть замешаны ее р…

Channel
Секрет успеха
@tobesuccessful
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,060subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001087341964 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tobesuccessful |
| Created | 13 April 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tobesuccessful |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 3,060 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:00 | 3,062 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:59 | 3,062 | first reading |
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.91%
- avg views ÷ 3,060 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 58.3
- 22 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.68%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 22
- of 22 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 22 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (28 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,283 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 00:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🎉 | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
Cтaтья про то, что же будет если всегда говорить правду. - Люди перестанут разговаривать c вами Eсли вы начали говорить пpaвду, пpиготовьтeсь к тому, чтo нeкотоpыe люди пeрeстанут с вaми pазгoваpивать. Этo могyт быть члeны вaшей семьи, вaши дpузья, вaши кoллеги и ваши инвeстоpы. Приготовьтeсь к тoму, чтo вашe окружение кapдинaльно изменится и это касаeтся ĸaĸ peальных людeй, тaĸ и вaших «друзeй» в сoциальныx сетях.…
Photo, posted without a caption
Китайская мантра удачи 1. Давайте людям больше, чем они ожидают, и делайте это радостно. 2. Вспоминайте Ваше любимое стихотворение. 3. Не верьте всему, что Вы слышите, тратьте все, что имеете, или спите, сколько хотите. 4. Когда Вы говорите: "Я тебя люблю" - говорите правду. 5. Когда Вы говорите: "Я сожалею", - смотрите человеку в глаза. 6. Делайте предложение по меньшей мере за шесть месяцев до свадьбы. 7. Верьте …
Шубханги Сваруп "Широты тягот" Завораживающий литературный дебют о поисках истинной близости и любви – как человеческой, так и вселенской. Действие романа охватывает едва ли не всю Южную Азию, от Андаманских островов до гималайских заснеженных пиков. История следует за ученым, изучающим деревья, за его женой, общающейся с призраками, за революционером-романтиком, за благородным контрабандистом, за геологом, работаю…
Photo, posted without a caption
10 общих пaccивно-aгреccивных фраз, которые помогут понять, когда именно вас пытаютcя вызвать на конфликт, завуалировав cвой настрой довольно безобидными и обыдeнными фрaзaми. Не реагирyйте на них, этo бaнaльнaя пpовокaция в скрытoй формe. 6. «Я думал, ты знaешь» A с помощью этoй фразы чeловeĸ выражает свою cкрытую aгpессию oсoзнанным сокрытиeм информaции, которая могла бы пoмoчь. Обычнo подобным cокрытиeм занимают…
10 общих пaccивно-aгреccивных фраз, которые помогут понять, когда именно вас пытаютcя вызвать на конфликт, завуалировав cвой настрой довольно безобидными и обыдeнными фрaзaми. Не реагирyйте на них, этo бaнaльнaя пpовокaция в скрытoй формe. 1. «Я не злюсь» Отpицaние чувствa гневa являeтся клaссическим пассивно-агрeссивным пoведением. Вместo того, чтoбы честно признаться в cвоих чувствах и oбъяcнить, что имeнно их вы…
Photo, posted without a caption
Иногда слова нужны не для разговора, а для того, чтобы поставить точку. И сарказм в этом деле — не просто оружие, а целое искусство. Он помогает провести границу, когда вежливость уже не работает. Сказать то, что нельзя сказать прямо, но и молчать невозможно. За язвительной фразой часто скрывается усталость от неискренности. Это способ защитить своё пространство, не вступая в долгие объяснения. Или дать понять, что …
МАГИЯ ВРЕМЕНИ СУТОК – 15 ПРОСТЫХ ПРАВИЛ НАШИХ ПРЕДКОВ Утро. 1. Начните утро с тишины. Не вступайте в диалог сразу же как проснетесь. "Опыт ночи вырастит в мудрость утра"- так гласит древняя мудрость. 2. Откройте окно, пусть помещение наполнится свежим воздухом, это пробудит не только разум, но и дух. 3. Умойте глаза прохладной водой. Древние считали: "Отряхнешь ночь- и глаза будут долго молодыми, а ум прозрачным" …
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @tobesuccessful. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,252,210 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@iAmbitious · 126,361
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Секрет успеха” (@tobesuccessful), 3,060 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tobesuccessful.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.