الروحانيات وطب الامام الصادق عليه السلام pinned «✔️قناة فيض الامام الحسين ع https://t.me/fayd_alhusayn ✔️الروحانيات وطب الامام الصادق ع https://t.me/tib_alsadiq1 ✏️ادارة القناة @Alrohaniat_183»

Channel
الروحانيات وطب الامام الصادق عليه السلام
@tib_alsadiq1
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,086subscribers
-252 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001338664609 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tib_alsadiq1 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 31 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tib_alsadiq1 |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 14:00 | 25,086 | -12 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 25,098 | -14 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 25,112 | -20 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 25,132 | -13 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 25,145 | -23 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 25,168 | -15 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:18 | 25,183 | -12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:59 | 25,195 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:11 | 25,199 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 25,210 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 25,213 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 19:25 | 25,219 | -10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 25,229 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:38 | 25,231 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 25,238 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:16 | 25,246 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 25,257 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 25,258 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:23 | 25,262 | -13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 17:41 | 25,275 | first reading |
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 16 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.5%
- avg views ÷ 25,086 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,140
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 23 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 23 (16 May 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 9,420 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 12:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
☀️حديث الكساء مع البخور ☀️الاكثار من الصلاة على محمد وال محمد ☀️اخراج الصدقة بنية السلامة 💚💚💚💚💚
Photo, posted without a caption
☀️ختم الى حضرة النبي المصطفى محمد وحفيده الامام الصادق عليهم افضل واعظم الصلوات ⬇️⬇️ ⏺⏺افلح بالخير والبركة والعافية والرزق وانشراح الصدر وطهارة الروح من صلى على محمد وال محمد وعجل فرجهم ☀️نرفع اسمى ايات التهاني و التبريكات إلى مقام مولانا صاحب العصر و الزمان ( عجل الله تعالى فرجه الشريف ) و الى مراجعنا العظام والى جميع الأخوة والأخوات ... بذكرى ولادة النبي الاعظم أبي القاسم محمد ( صلى الله عليه وآله ) وحفي…
☀️خلفية هذا الشهر 🟡للوفرة 🟡للصحة 🟡للحظ 🟡للبهجة
Channel photo updated
✅ اشترك و شارك القناة 🤍ثواب القناة عني وعنكم جميعاً 🤍السلام عليك يا بقية الله 🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 https://t.me/Spiritual_Mystic_Minutes183
🤍قراءة آية النور { 40 مرة على ماء ورد} 🗣{اللَّهُ نُورُ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ مَثَلُ نُورِهِ كَمِشْكَاةٍ فِيهَا مِصْبَاحٌ الْمِصْبَاحُ فِي زُجَاجَةٍ الزُّجَاجَةُ كَأَنَّهَا كَوْكَبٌ دُرِّيٌّ يُوقَدُ مِن شَجَرَةٍ مُّبَارَكَةٍ زَيْتُونَةٍ لَّا شَرْقِيَّةٍ وَلَا غَرْبِيَّةٍ يَكَادُ زَيْتُهَا يُضِيءُ وَلَوْ لَمْ تَمْسَسْهُ نَارٌ نُورٌ عَلَى نُورٍ يَهْدِي اللَّهُ لِنُورِهِ مَنْ يَشَاءُ وَيَضْرِبُ اللَّهُ الْأَمْثَالَ…
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
❌هذا الشهر مشهور بالنحوسة والشؤم ❌الاحراز والطلاسم
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @tib_alsadiq1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tib_alsadiq1 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 30 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 1 September 2026
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@fayd_alhusayn · 8,303#1
@Jwahrh · 24,606#2
@ahrof99noor · 52,004#3
@cyidu · 1,622#4
@abas_1987 · 11,541#5
@ahmaeedoffici · 416#6
@fghtydf · 2,230#7
@healthaoy · 568#8
@zziirrr313 · 1,026#9
@c_alkhalidi313 · 648#10
@husslpb · 204#11
@mpdwh8w · 934#12
@AAAllliiiiammm · 219#13
@quran_my_life7 · 1,775#14
@RmjyPiC4rjowMGNi · 318#15
@zzzzhhhhhaaa · 23,054#16
@alkemah12 · 559#17
@musawu · 38,278#18
@al_najaf · 768#19
@AL_musawe313 · 5,853#20
@uuuuu5o · 549#21
@Mahabu · 55,174#22
@aln000rr · 49,250#23
@liHliZli · 1,089#24
@Hanawekemea · 1,169 (as read 14 September 2026)#25
@ndalj · 1,526#26
@rehny313 · 2,355#27
@tukidatorsuals7 · 937 (as read 14 September 2026)#28
@om369ali · 1,232#29
@shiaabook · 1,941#30
@afopi · 2,334#31
@kalamukumnnur · 2,402#32
@reee_55 · 1,186#33
@almaesoom · 1,386#34
@nour_razaq_2024 · 310 (as read 14 September 2026)#35
@Salihaliraqi · 168,669#36
@Q_QS3 · 434#37
@ZN_2007S · 417#38
@shaqerrs · 6,663#39
@school7878 · 93#40
@tabboush2 · 430#41
@yousef2009mf · 117#42
@ibotorab · 388#43
@j_mary20 · 238#44
@qoraaniah · 1,332#45
@ten120 · 357 (as read 14 September 2026)#46
@Kanonxd1 · 913#47
@arkanalshibani23 · 283#48
@WASSEThealth · 962 (as read 14 September 2026)#49
@q10zm · 391 (as read 14 September 2026)#50
@facdy313 · 2,508#51
@hlepyoulearn · 16,282#52
@yamhdi38 · 6,115#53
@HussainAli1h · 639#54
@jalasat_ECA · 302#55
@yaqoobioffice · 10,166#56
@s_7aja1 · 375 (as read 14 September 2026)#57
@derusetghvk · 809#58
@uv25l · 112#59
@skrmat12 · 93#60
@atabatiq · 1,354#61
@Alal34fh · 2,869#62
@Clinicalpharmacyworld · 544 (as read 14 September 2026)#63
@c10002000 · 94#64
@readmh · 961#65
@bzjauauwiqiqiqiqqi · 1,155#66
@update_free · 128#67
@noorbookpdf · 2,241#68
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@Jwahrh · 24,606
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
@ahrof99noor · 52,004
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 24 August 2026
@zzzzhhhhhaaa · 23,054
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الروحانيات وطب الامام الصادق عليه السلام” (@tib_alsadiq1), 25,086 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tib_alsadiq1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.