Channel
@zzzzhhhhhaaa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
23,077subscribers
+199 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001222337729 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @zzzzhhhhhaaa |
| Description | 2018/2/11 🌱 في محراب العشق الإلهي .. أُسجُد ولا تَقُم ! . قناتنا الثانية : مشكاة العارفين https://t.me/mishkaty للتواصل : @mishkaty77_bot |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/zzzzhhhhhaaa |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 23,077 | +23 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:17 | 23,054 | +3 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 23,051 | -5 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:40 | 23,056 | +56 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:56 | 23,000 | -5 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:17 | 23,005 | +26 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 22,979 | +1 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 13:01 | 22,978 | +36 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 11:55 | 22,942 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:28 | 22,945 | -8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:14 | 22,953 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 22,956 | +35 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 22,921 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 22,922 | +6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 22,916 | +13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 22,903 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 22,916 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:39 | 22,918 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 22,916 | -20 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 22,936 | first reading |
103 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 31 of 32 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 103 (24 July 2026 – 28 September 2026) |
| Views total | 16,877 |
| Reactions total | 510 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 21:33 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
1,713 reactions across 99 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,412 | 82.4% | |
| 💔 | 210 | 12.3% | |
| 🥰 | 26 | 1.52% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 1.17% | |
| 😢 | 18 | 1.05% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 0.525% | |
| 👏 | 8 | 0.467% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 0.409% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 0.175% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 103 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,782 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 103 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 28 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟡 لو وصل الإنسان إلی مرتبة حیث لایری غیر الله ، سوف یعطیه الله کل شيء و تخرج اللذات الکاذبة من حیاته و یظهر له ذلک الجمال المطلق ... #الشیخ_جوادي_الآملي
❤11🥰5
Signed آلعجل يَآصاحبْ آلزمانْ ³¹³.
🌕 اذا بتعدت عن الذنب مهما يكن عملك قليلا هو مقبول والعمل الذي يقبل لايكون قليلا ولا صغيراً #السيد_عبد_الحسين_دستغيب
❤12
Signed آلعجل يَآصاحبْ آلزمانْ ³¹³.
🌕 "س:ما أكبر حيوان ذُكِر في القرآن الكريم؟ ◯ العِجل ؟ ◯ الفِيل ؟ ◯ الحُوت ؟
Signed مشكاة العارفين
📕هكذا تكلم جعفر الصادق (عليه السلام). ✍بقلم: السيد تقي السيد حسين الموسوي.
❤2
Signed آلعجل يَآصاحبْ آلزمانْ ³¹³.
🌕 يقول الشيخ محمد تقي بهجت( قدس سره) : إذا كانت النفس غير مقبلة على قراءة القرآن، فعليك الإكثار من الصلاة على النبي وآله؛ فإنها سوف تهديك... #البالغ_مناه_الشيخ_محمد_بهجت
❤11
Signed آلعجل يَآصاحبْ آلزمانْ ³¹³.
إذا أراد الإنسان أن يعلم لماذا لا يستطيع أن يأنسَ مع الله في الصَّلاة كما هو مطلوبٌ ولازم، فيجب أن ينظُر إلى مدى تعلّقه بالشَّهوات غير المحللَّة والأفكار الباطلة. 🔴 آية الله الفقيه الشَّيخ محمَّد تقي مصباح اليزدي رض، 📕 العروج إلى اللَّامتناهي، ص 134.
❤7
Signed آلعجل يَآصاحبْ آلزمانْ ³¹³.
🌕 قراءة سورة القدر: ورد عن السيد الكشميري نقلاً عن السيد القاضي قراءة سورة (إنا أنزلناه في ليلة القدر) بمقدار (١٠٠) مرة في ليلة الجمعة، و (١٠٠) مرة في عصر يوم الجمعة لما في ذلك من أثر روحي عظيم. #العلامة_السيد_الكشميري
❤22😢2
Signed سلوة العارفين
🌕 إذا أراد الإنسان أن يعلم لماذا لا يستطيع أن يأنس مع الله في الصلاة كما هو مطلوب ولازم، فيجب أن ينظر إلى مدى تعلقه بالشهوات غير المحللة والأفكار الباطلة #الشيخ_محمد_تقي_المصباح_اليزدي
❤21💔3😢2
Signed سلوة العارفين
🌕 «ليس هناك أُذُن واعية تسمع!» كان الأستاذ فاطمي نيا يقول: «نقل أحد تلامذة العلامة الطباطبائي خاطراً: كانت لي حاجة عند المرحوم العلامة؛ فذهبت إلى منزله وطرقت الباب، لكن لم يفتح أحد الباب. ولم يكن في الكوكبة (الأزقة) أحد أبداً، وكانت أبواب الجيران ونوافذهم جميعاً مغلقة. وفجأة، سمعت صوتاً يقول: "(العلامة في مقبرة الحاج الشيخ!)". كلما نظرت حولي، لم أر أحداً. فقلت في نفسي: "سأذهب إلى مقبرة الحاج الشيخ (الجديدة)؛ فإن كان…
❤15🔥3🥰2😢2
Signed سلوة العارفين
🌕 " سألوا السید علي القاضي "ره" : ماذا نفعل في سبیل إصلاح قلوبنا التي فقدت طهارتها⁉️ إن قلوبنا أصبحت غیر طاهرة بسبب المعاصي الکبیرة و الصغیرة ، ماذا نفعل لإصلاحها⁉️ قال السید "ره" : … لمعرفة المزيد إضغط هنا 👈🏻
❤11
Signed مشكاة العارفين
🌕 لقد زالت كل القوى ولم تبق سوى قوة واحدة ... وتلك هي قوة الإمام الحسين عليه السلام ، الكثير من الناس لا تربطهم بالدين أي رابطة إلا من خلال الإمام الحسين عليه السلام ولو قطعت هذه الرابطة ، لكان الدین قد اندثر تماماً وتلاشى #السيد_موسى_الشبيري_الزنجاني نسأل الله ان يتغمده بواسع رحمته.
❤20💔6
Signed سلوة العارفين
🌕 «إذا بلغت النفس درجة الطهارة، رأت في المنام عجائب، وصارت محط عناية النفوس التي تجردت عن أبدانها، ويُفيض الله عليها من نور رحمته لذة لا تعادلها أي لذة. وكلما كانت المراقبة أتم وأحسن، وكانت حراسة النفس والحذر أشد وأقوى؛ كانت الأفكار، والتعقلات، والمكاشفات، والتمثلات، والرؤى، وجميع إدراكات المرء بوجه عام، أصفى وأقرب إلى الواقع؛ حتى تصل النفس بفضل طهارتها الحقيقية الذاتية التي اكتسبتها إلى مرتبة تجد فيها عين الواقع وك…
❤17
Signed سلوة العارفين
Showing the 12 most recent of 103 posts we hold for @zzzzhhhhhaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💚أنين العاشقين💚” (@zzzzhhhhhaaa), 23,077 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zzzzhhhhhaaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.